Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Jun 27, 2026 11:42

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:25 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Given so many people don't indicate at junctions, and sometimes it's impossible to tell if the car causing concern is not bothering to signal, or is in fact acutally going straight ahead. I am wondering if having a straight ahead indicator would help to remove the confusion.

I figure it would look something like this:

Image

There would be a similar one on the rear, of course.

Obviously it would only be a requirement on new cars, and legal to retrofit them to old cars, same as with foglights and so on.

Good idea or not?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 14:48 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
I have to say I've thought of this myself in the past.

But it wouldn't stop the basic problem of people either not indicating at all, or indicating incorrectly :(

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 14:58 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
Nice of triumph to provide a hole there for your indicator.
... and I thought it was for the starting handle....

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 15:00 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
ummmm......??

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8817

I did wonder why my post had disappeared.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 15:19 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I've locked this duplicate topic - please direct comments to the other... (see post above)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.037s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]