crw wrote:
Is Safe Speed Campaign wrong for the following reasons?
1) They have no evidence what so ever to prove, removing speed cameras lives well be saved.
2) When others like me, present evidence that proves speed cameras save lives, they are scare of the truth as proven by the abuse directed towards me, changing subjects and ducking and weaving (You don't believe what others provided, why should anyone believe what Safe Speed or their supporters provided?)
3) Maybe others can see it? But I cannot see anywhere, of what Safe Speed considered a safe speed? (Even those someone on the side of Safe Speed considered a zero speed as a safe speed)
4) etc etc etc
Apart from that elsewhere I have asked you to read the site - which you have failed to do, or you would be also doing as I requested, that after doing this that you then ask ONE SPECIFIC question that we can debate.
You are failing to do this simple task. Your comments are far too wide to answer in detail, and as I said, ask a single point, and then we shall debate it. The website speaks for itself.
Many people here have kindly spent AGES trying to explain things to you and I have told you that I am extremely busy at the moment, quite understandably, so asking wide varied questions, is both unkind and disrespectful, as well as very untimely.
I take it that you are trying to tempt me into an involved answer. Since you cannot respect my wishes, is an appalling lack of empathy.
Ask a specific question that can be debated, or your postings will be binned on sight.