Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 09, 2026 12:21

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 19:13 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:44
Posts: 2
I was recently 'zapped' by a static camera doing an alleged 36 in a 30 Zone. However, It was dark and 0645 in the morning and the roads were wet. The driver in front of me obviously spotted the camera too late and hit their brakes hard and went into a skid. I had a car right behind me and thus didn't want to hit my brakes but the the left lane was clear and so I moved into it safely and accelerated past the hazard. (I knew the camera was there but went into crash prevention mode.)

Question: is it best to plead not guilty and then go explain to the court or fill out the summons and add in the mitigation? Thankx.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 23:13 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
Sailorman wrote:

Question: is it best to plead not guilty and then go explain to the court or fill out the summons and add in the mitigation? Thankx.


Pleading mitigation will at best get you the same as the fixed penalty.

OTOH you could try fighting it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 00:56 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
If you were speeding to avoid a crash then that can be a valid defence in law. (I'm not sure that you were from your description.)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 09:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
SafeSpeed wrote:
If you were speeding to avoid a crash then that can be a valid defence in law. (I'm not sure that you were from your description.)

But without an experienced lawyer you won't stand a chance with it. My second conviction was where I accelerated to avoid an aggressive driver coming up behind me at 90 in a (very safe, no junctions, dead straight DC) 60 - I was doing 60 and had to speed up to get around a car in L1 that had sped up to prevent me pulling in. The problem was both vehicles were unmarked traffic police who were operating the very hidden trap, and no sooner had I gone through it than the gave each other a thumbs up and the faster car pulled in behind the slow one. To paraphrase the judge: "Yes we understand that it was the only safe option, however you were speeding, so we have to fine you, although we will only fine you the minimum amount based on your earnings".


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 13:32 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
Rewolf wrote:
But without an experienced lawyer you won't stand a chance with it. My second conviction was where I accelerated to avoid an aggressive driver coming up behind me at 90 in a (very safe, no junctions, dead straight DC) 60 - I was doing 60 and had to speed up to get around a car in L1 that had sped up to prevent me pulling in. The problem was both vehicles were unmarked traffic police who were operating the very hidden trap, and no sooner had I gone through it than the gave each other a thumbs up and the faster car pulled in behind the slow one. To paraphrase the judge: "Yes we understand that it was the only safe option, however you were speeding, so we have to fine you, although we will only fine you the minimum amount based on your earnings".

:shock: That's absolutely disgusting!

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 15:06 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
I know, but I cannot prove anything. It is why I am here.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 22:48 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Rewolf wrote:
I know, but I cannot prove anything. It is why I am here.


Seen some of your other posts re police ---had to be a reason - can sympathise -


Perhaps this true story might just help --

One night many moons ago , trucker was heading up through country lanes , with a car behind, so he sped up a little as car could not pass him. On came the blue light, SPEEDING TICKET ISSUED.
Next week , same spot - car behind, trucker spots lights on roof , lets car get too close for comfort --- ooh dear - was that a rabbit in front - air brakes stop truck dead - not so cop car -
Trucker gets out , and says to cop in driving seat "better get your boss out here - you were driving toooooo close to me".


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.009s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]