Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Jun 05, 2026 10:29

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:16 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:05
Posts: 1
Guys hope that you can offer some assistance or advice.

Received a NIP from the Metropolitan Police for driving at Excess Speed of 47mph in a 40mph zone.

The alleged offence took place in early January. It has taken this long to get to me as the car is my other halves company car. So the original NIP went to her company, they then provided the authorities with her details as the car is in her name and she then passed them my details as I was the driver at the time of the offence.

I know the road pretty well that the offence took place on and know that it wasn't a Gatso that pinged me so suspect that it was either a handheld radar gun, or a van parked at the road side that caught me.

So what are my options as I quite like having a clean licence and don't particularly want to pay a fine.

Thanks

Al


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Langy1976 wrote:
So what are my options as I quite like having a clean licence and don't particularly want to pay a fine.

If you believe the speed reading to be correct (you don’t appear to be contesting it) then I reckon you would be better off just accepting the penalty. The courts tend not to like people who fight to chance it or for the sake of it.

Sorry, I can’t tell you what you want to hear.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:43 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
smeggy wrote:
Langy1976 wrote:
So what are my options as I quite like having a clean licence and don't particularly want to pay a fine.

If you believe the speed reading to be correct (you don’t appear to be contesting it) then I reckon you would be better off just accepting the penalty. The courts tend not to like people who fight to chance it or for the sake of it.

Sorry, I can’t tell you what you want to hear.


I can't really agree with Smeggy on this one. For a start the authorities are sloppy in their prosecutions and thousands of people who are innocent in law pay fixed penalties. Nick Freeman (Mr Loophole) claims to have won 50 speeding cases in a row because each and every prosecution case had a fatal flaw. I take that to suggest that ordinary people have a 50/50 chance at least if they put in enough effort.

But we're not the best folk to help you fight the case. Pop along to Pepipoo and ask your question there.

Find out about the 'PACE Witness statement' and the Francis and O'Halloran ECHR case BEFORE you fill in the form. In fact the 28 days they have given you to return the form is a substantial gift - take full advantage.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 13:23 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
SafeSpeed wrote:
I can't really agree with Smeggy on this one. For a start the authorities are sloppy in their prosecutions and thousands of people who are innocent in law pay fixed penalties.

This is true but compare that to the millions who are fairly nicked. IIRC, it was stated by Vonhosen that 14% of speeding cases are dropped (he never did give me a source for that). So is it worth a steeper penalty for a small chance of none? Furthermore, the people who do fight tend to have a basis for a case whereas the OP clearly doesn’t. Of course he could simply make something up but AtPtCoJ carries much steeper penalties.

SafeSpeed wrote:
Nick Freeman (Mr Loophole) claims to have won 50 speeding cases in a row because each and every prosecution case had a fatal flaw.

True, but the OP is unlikely to get Freeman representing him. Besides, that achievement was a while ago, the system is a lot tighter now and his current rate isn’t so great.

SafeSpeed wrote:
Pop along to Pepipoo and ask your question there.

Now this I do agree with.

Let us know how you get on Langy.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.029s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]