Safe Speed Forums

My understanding of our newest troll seems to be growing every day! It would seem that he is trying to get someone, anyone, on the forum to openly condone speeding, presumably to provide him a stick, with which to beat the campaign (since every troll seems to believe that every poster on this open forum is a SafeSpeed spokesman).

Unfortunately for him, again like so many of his species, he has misunderstood our standpoint on the matter ("if they don't like speed cameras, they must approve of speeding"). Ensnared by his own logical fallacy, he is now trying to purport that lack of condemnation equates to a tacit condonation. He seems to have affirmed this opinion to himself by cherry-picking cases from the Help! forum where posters have been offered advice to ensure that the prosections they face are legal. Given his slavishness to legality one might have thought he'd approve. He has, of course, utterly ignored the posts from that forum where the advice to the poster has been "You were a pillock, take your lumps and learn from it."

With the exponential increases in my understanding of trollish behavior and motivations, coupled with the latest specimen's prolific posting, I believe I will soon have enough information to formulate a Unified Theory of Trolling, upon completion of which I hope to gain fellowship to the university where he "cleaned the toilets for 5 years" as a Professor of Trollology.