Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:13

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: I was speeding but...?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 13:57 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 13:48
Posts: 2
Northumbria Police have issued Notice of Intended Prosecution. I was "flashed" doing 58mph on a stretch of dual carriageway (A1058 Coast Road, Newcastle) with a 50 mph limit, shortly before it changes to 70mph, road was dry, fairly quiet, good visibility (although I didn't notice the Bl**dy camera obviously!!!). I admit when I looked down at speedo when flash went off I was indeed doing 58mph. Is there anything I can do? Or do I just have to take it like a man and pay the fine?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 14:39 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Have a look at pepipoo. They specialise in this sort of thing.

If your speedo was showing 58mph, then there is a good chance that you were actually going slower than this due to tolerances all being downwards.

A fairly typical location to make money - DC leading to NSL - but it may be a "fair cop".

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 16:56 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
What sort of camera was it?

A Redspeed, or a GATSO?

If it's a Redspeed, they are (notoriously) inaccurate, and the proof they bring to court is decidedly dodgy.
Ask if you can see the secondary check pictures - I have seen a set for a Redspeed where the driver got off in court. The pictures showed he had NOT travelled the required distance, and SHOULD have been checked before a summons was issued!

A look at the court lists for Kendal showed a lot of drivers being done right on the threshold.

If you are not sure of the type, let us know and somebody will post up some pictures.

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:25 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 13:48
Posts: 2
Sure it was GATSO, N'mbria Police' letter gave me link to site, where I can see photos and they woulsd seem to show that was doing 58 which even I believe is correct. Also on the site has copys of certificates showing camera been calibrated correctly etc and the camera facing front of vehicle so you can see its me. So looks like I'll have to pay up. The sickening thing as I say is that as the map on the site showing where the camera is, and the pictures of me passing the camera. It was a dual carriageway completely seperated from all pedestrian traffic, and it was a bright clear day, no other traffic in picture frame and i was doing 58mph. What exactly is UNSAFE about that!!!!!.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 19:43 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
If it was forward facing, it was probably a Truvelo.
Can you PM a link to me to see the pictures/calibration certificate?

I have been looking at GATSO and REDSPEED certificates.
The certificates displayed do not even come close to the Home Office's own requirements given in their Guide to Calibration Requirements for Traffic Enforcement Equipment
http://scienceandresearch.homeoffice.go ... ?version=1
Home Office website wrote:
Provides guidance on requirements for the calibration of traffic enforcement equipment which has been type-approved. Existing handbooks published by PSDB describe the procedures and requirements to be met to obtain type-approval for speedmeters, traffic light cameras, and bus lane cameras. These require type-approved devices to be calibrated annually, and this document lays down the minimum requirements for these calibration procedures.

As well as the types of tests required for each device, this handbook also elaborates on the requirements for documentation and certification of the calibration process.


The British Standard for calibration certificates (shared with European and International Standards) is BS EN ISO 17025.
It's doubtful any of them meet this standard - they need the money too badly!

All is not lost yet! At the very least you can make them work for your money!

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 22:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9263
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Type of camera - have a look on www.speedcam.co.uk - shows most types of camera in use.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 16:21 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 16:01
Posts: 6
as in the advet NO BUTS!! OBSERVATION OBSERVATION OBSERVATION there is really no excuse for excessive speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 16:23 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
safe driver c3 wrote:
as in the advet NO BUTS!! OBSERVATION OBSERVATION OBSERVATION there is really no excuse for excessive speed


Agreed, however, this is not the same as exceeding the speed limit.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 08:33 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
stevo25 wrote:
Northumbria Police have issued Notice of Intended Prosecution. I was "flashed" doing 58mph on a stretch of dual carriageway (A1058 Coast Road, Newcastle) with a 50 mph limit, shortly before it changes to 70mph, road was dry, fairly quiet, good visibility (although I didn't notice the Bl**dy camera obviously!!!). I admit when I looked down at speedo when flash went off I was indeed doing 58mph. Is there anything I can do? Or do I just have to take it like a man and pay the fine?
~~If you check out the Read this is you have a NIP at the topic of this Forum section ... the website has various offers of advice to be considered.

Have they sent you items 'in' or 'out of' time?
Ask for their evidence and insist on obtaining all the video (proper 'real time' rate not 1 in every 5th frame) from 'that days session'.
Ask for calibration certificates.

Check that all the road sign are 'right' or wrong.

Mary Monson solicitors can be reach for FREE on 0808 1554 870 and also have a website here that has a free guide for motorists.
Using them helps to support Safe Speed.
If you become a Safe Speed member then they give you a 10% discount and access to The Clubhouse Forum.

Hope that this helps ...point you in the right direction ... there are many good folk here that will try to help ...

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Last edited by SafeSpeedv2 on Thu Feb 21, 2008 21:15, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:49 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
interesting...
do they do English and Scottish law?

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 21:22 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
If I recall correctly the transport Laws are Nation wide ... but perhaps we can check into this ....
They certainly are very happy to represent anyone from anywhere in the UK.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 00:08 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
If I recall correctly the transport Laws are Nation wide ... but perhaps we can check into this ....

I suddenly have this vision of a biker in Scotland, wearing a kilt, and getting done for indecency... or flashing at a speed camera! :D

There are actually two sets of laws.
On your licences and insurance documents, your MOT and registration document, EVERYTHING has to be exactly as the law prescribes, but if you are a speed camera manufacturer, you can ignore all the Home office requirements, and get away with it.

I hope Stevo contacts me for all the documentation he could check if it's a REDSPEED, and takes it to Pepipoo or Monsons. :oops:

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 00:30 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9263
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Ernest Marsh wrote:
I suddenly have this vision of a biker in Scotland, wearing a kilt, and getting done for indecency... or flashing at a speed camera! :D




Ern - having consulted with several gents in Scotland - there can be no problems with construction and use regulations of any personal parts whilst wearing the kilt - ALL PARTS ARE IN FULL WORKING ORDER. (I.E. NOTHING IS IN THE SLIGHTEST PART WORN)

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 08:17 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
the law in Scotland is more or less the same. however the procedure is different. A ruling by the high court in London is persuasive but not binding on a Scottish court.

the law in other areas is VERY different... buying houses for example.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.023s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]