Quite naturally .. CW's Kieth Bingham is spitting mad over this outcome

He writes
CW wrote:
There is no justice for the family of the late jason MacIntyre, killed by a driver who claimed not to have seen him
Perhaps .. but justice is about the administration of the law according to accepted and prescribed principles. - which is about being fair to the accused of a crime.. and taking account of human acts of stupidity - committed without intent to be stupid .

Thoughout each generation - the human race has battled to conquer this "stupidity gene"
Revenge is about retaliating for wrongs or injury received. Justice .. is not about "revenge", but does seek in the case of malicious and deliberate crimes, to impose the sentences which show how much a society disapproves of such vicious acts.
KB reminds us of another
cyclist killed when a driver pulled out without looking
He writes
Quote:
Unbelievably, not seeing the other road user or not stopping to check if someone else is approaching a junction before pulling out is not considered by the law to be dangerous driving. It is incredible that a driver who calims not to have seen the other road use does not merit a charge of dangerous driving

Well .. on the other side of the coin .. we have a pedestrian who was badly injured by a
cyclist who "claimed he did not see her" when he pulled out of a junction without looking..

Happened the other week... story somewhere in our local papers. :roll;
Or what about the two deaths within the last 7 months or so .. whereby the cyclists rode at speed and
claimed they did not see the pedestians they hit and who died when their heads hit the kerb as they fell? By the way .. the fines were derisory and yes.. the families concerned wanted MANSLAUGHTER charges brought against the two cyclists in these separate incidents. There was no order to prevent their cycling either..
Abroad .. in many EU countries, including Holland and Dnmark

- there are onuses on all road users .. pedestrians.. cyclists and drivers alike to be vigilant towards each other.
Quote:
A new law - causing death by careless driving - is not yet on the statute book .. but road safety campaigners fear this new law will just mean the CPS passing off dangerous driving as careless driving - which is easier to prove and carries a lighter sentence
Actually . the same criteria applies. We have to find the evidence which proves beyond all reasoned doubt .. the exact nature of the carelessness (or rather negligence - because this law is our version of the EU's "negligent one") and how far that act of negligence caused the incident to occur. In the interests of justice - we also have to investigate, fully, the behaviour of the other party prior to the incident as well. It may be that we charge both or all parties. We have done so here in the past. We may have a low FPN tally.. but our fines are usually imposed by the courts as we prosecute a heck of a lot more for downright

stupidity
Quote:
Relatives of those killed have been horrified when the consequences of the driver's actions are not even mentioned in the court and have no bearing on the driving being judged.
Err. all the cases we have passed on the evidence to the CPS for prosecution carry the full investigation and what the outcome of this carelessness and dangerous acts created

I wonder how many actual court cases the writer here has actually attended ..

Quote:
The fact is that the courts are wary of punishing a driver for what is often termed "a momentary lapse of attention"
They take into account all the facts and circumstances.

Quote:
If using the roads is a game of chance, the conditions are weighted in favour of those driving heavier vehicles
It is why I keep saying COAST applies to EVERYONE whether on foot, on hoof, on wheels or in some wheeled contraption. :popcron:
CW wrote:
I suggest an automatic loss of licence at the very least. That threat might concentrate minds
This driver did lose his licence for 6 months. I would perhaps suggest they recommend a re-test or a compulsory DIS - but in the case of the DIS for such cases - remove the licence if they fail this course. At present .. they can lose licence if they fail to turn up or turn up and be "disruptive in class" - and we return the file back to the CPS for the court to do its job..
Quote:
The law fails to take into account the dispoproptionate and tragic consequences one trivuial mistake can make at the wheel of a ton of metal
The law does and it is about justice for ALL parties involved - and not revenge
Quote:
The law should not surprise us. The lawmakers' maxim is "There but for the grace of God .. go I"
Indeed .. because our laws still have to take account of that one human gene which we all possess.. the "stupid one". I admit it appears to be more pronounced in some folk out there

- but no one can afford to be complacent and all have a responsibility towards their own safety and that of others.
A pedestrian running along a footpath can collide with another and cause their death or serious injury .. just as a
cyclist can and has done so.. An incorrectly filled filing cabinet toppling over and striking someone's head with the sharp corner .. Accidents.. Moment of not looking ahead.. moment of human stupidity.. and the law still has to take this into account to award justice to the idiot in the dock and punish accordingly.
