dcbwhaley wrote:
Nor is it within the comprehension of a large number of motorised road users

Or those with heads in their rights ,rather than in looking for a safe way for all - to create harmony takes consent from all sides . And when motorists get attacked by biking lobbys ,they tend to stick by their rights .
PERHAPS IT'S TIME FOR ALL ON THE ROADS to look at their responsibilities to ALL other road users . ( And some posting on behalf of one group to realise that responsibility ) .
BTW - I cycled for a lot of years before I owned a car . Approx 16 . Then i drove .The some years later ,I cycled again -and saw the difference . Now I drive with a different perspective . I see the Chav lot -who dive on and off of the pavement ,dicing with death . And those who take the care to be seen ,and take care in wearing the right ( though comical ) gear . The latter group ,behave as AIM motorist would - a joy to behold . And if I see one ahead ,I treat them with respect . The Chav -I treat with comtempt, not knowing what they'll next get up to .
PERHAPS -it's time for the cycling lobby to get it's house in order :stop attacking motorists,and work together to make the roads a place to enjoy. AND for those championioning and whining on behalf of the poor cyclist to get up a platform and talk about road safety - road safety only occurs when ALL occupiers of the roads are intent on ensuring the safety of all ,and giving up all rights of way to see that we ensure the safety of all road users .
I've worked on the rail network for a lot of years - and the one phrase I 've always heard "We expect that ALL staff shoulf go home as fit as when they came to work".
PERHAPS that's the slogan we need to get over to ALL road users -no one has right of way - if the safety of others can be compromised .All road users are responbile for the safety of others .