Thatsnews wrote:
But, as had been alluded to, if there had not been a speed camera there, the officer would not have posed for it.
So this is a circumstance when it is proven that someone drove in a dangerous manner because of a speed camera.
(In America, many who pretty much drive for a living - cops, firefighters, ambulance drivers, truckers, taxi drivers - are allowed to drive without a seat belt. That doesn't mean it's advised against. Having taken two Emergency Vehicle Operations Courses myself, I know that seat belt use is strongly encouraged. It keeps the driver in better control of the vehicle to better avoid incidents and collisions, and enables quicker recovery from minor collisions that may occur during an emergency response.)
Let's see.
He was genuinely on a 999 call.
Both hands were 'trusting inertia'; he - at least partially - relinquished control of the vehicle (maybe he was using his knees? We don't know) while unbuckled.
I take the placement of the scamera as prima facie evidence that the road conditions in that area were probably safe at the moment, and that the officer 'confirmed' the road conditions to be safe, and was then reminded of the camera, either by seeing it, or by his partner. (Most scameras are placed where it's usually safe to exceed the posted speed 'limit' - otherwise costs would exceed profits) ...
He then decided to remove his hands, his eyes, and his mind, from both the task of driving above the posted 'limit', and from police business ... to amuse himself, his partner, and any fellow officers who would see this photo.
Does the Heisenberg Effect create jack@$$es, or does it merely weed them out?
A picture is worth a thousand words.