Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat May 30, 2026 14:57

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Pavement priority
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 01:47 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
:welcome: Maximator

How does you colleague behave when he is the pedestrian and crossing over and entrance way at a 'dropped kurb' or 'pavement break' location ? What expectations does he have ?

I found the following which helps to first establish what is considered to be a 'road', from the official CPS (gov) website here (about 2/3rds of the way down the page) :
CPS - Gov website wrote:
Definitions of 'Road or Other Public Place'

The term 'road' is defined at section 142 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 as any length of highway or other road to which the public has access and includes bridges over which a road passes. The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines 'road' as a line of communication for use of foot passengers and vehicles; while in Oxford v Austin [1981] RTR 416 it was said to be a definable right of way between two points.

The expression 'on a road or other public place' is employed frequently in Road Traffic legislation, for example, in the drafting of moving traffic offences at sections 1-6 RTA. A public place is a place to which the public, or part thereof, have access.
See Wilkinson's 1.122 to 1.160 for further details.
See also DPP v Vivier [1991] Crim LR 637, DPP v Neville [1996] 160 JP 758 and Cutter v Eagle Star Insurance Co. Ltd, Clarke v Kato and Others [1998] 4 All ER 417.
Insurance cover is required for the use of a vehicle on a road or a public place.
See Wilkinson's A18.358.
The onus is on the prosecution to establish that a particular location was a 'road' or 'other public place'.


Maximator wrote:
I was talking about this matter to a friend over the weekend and he sent me a pic of another situation where the kerb edges sweep in across the pavement but there is also a kerb edge at the road junction (attached pic). I've seen these elsewhere too (both in entrances to places like supermarkets and also at junctions to smaller residential roads) and wondered do these mean anything special? With all these variations it's no surprise people (drivers and pedestrians alike) are confused. :?
No they are still all a part of the road network for pedestrians and vehicles. If you are pointing out that some kerbs edge the pavement and then there is a clear tarmac roadway then the vehicle road 'path' that shows a road, as we all know it to more commonly be referred to as opposed to the pavement, will provide a motorists a different expectation of interaction with pedestrians. However it is clear that if a pedestrian steps out onto the road off the pavement all motorists will be expected to be able to stop in time. As said already, in essence anticipate the actions of others.
Some Supermarket carparks are private, some Council owned, and some owned by the Supermarkets but run under strict guidelines with the local Council, hence why some have charges and (many) don't.
But they are all areas where you are expected to give way to pedestrians, unless a traffic light system (or other appropriate instruction), provides you with that priority, or an agreement is given by the pedestrian. [As a slight aside : Be aware if you indicate to a pedestrian to cross the road in front of you, (after you have stopped or are already stopped) if they then collide with another vehicle, you can be held responsible, so always allow the pedestrian to choose to walk across of their own accord.]

I agree with much of the previous comments. :)
Some interesting pavement info and websites : here, here, here, & the Oxford Dictionery definition of dropped kerb here.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pavement priority
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 16:01 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:14
Posts: 7
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
:welcome: Maximator

How does you colleague behave when he is the pedestrian and crossing over and entrance way at a 'dropped kurb' or 'pavement break' location ? What expectations does he have ?




I'll endeavour to question him on that but I know from previous conversations that he pretty much drives everywhere (even a few hundred metres down his road to get the paper) so he probably has a very limited perspective! Maybe part of the driving test should include being a pedestrian!!?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pavement priority
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 13:11 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Maximator wrote:
I'll endeavour to question him on that but I know from previous conversations that he pretty much drives everywhere (even a few hundred metres down his road to get the paper) so he probably has a very limited perspective! Maybe part of the driving test should include being a pedestrian!!?


It should certainly include being a cyclist. 100 logged hours cycling before you can take your driving test :)

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pavement priority
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 17:41 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
dcbwhaley wrote:
It should certainly include being a cyclist. 100 logged hours cycling before you can take your driving test :)


I cycled loads when I was a child. Then I got a car.

I bet most people cycled 100 hours before they were 17.

Or does that not count?

:)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pavement priority
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 21:03 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Johnnytheboy wrote:
I bet most people cycled 100 hours before they were 17.


Evidence please

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pavement priority
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 21:11 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
The most likely outcome of compulsory cycling prior to getting a car licence would be the bad habits learned while cycling and not subject to correction would be transferred to the car.

Straight through a red light? Why not, I did it on my bike.
Drive on the pavement? ...
Head down and not looking where you are going? ...

Well you get the idea.

I think the idea of compulsory cycling is daft but it would only have a chance of working if cyclists had to have compulsory training and a test of competence to get a licence to pedal.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pavement priority
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 00:10 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 19:11
Posts: 172
Location: Southampton
If I am a pedestrian and a car is coming in or out of an entrance I will give way as that keeps me in a safe position. Equally if I am driving when a car is trying to come out of an entrance and traffic conditions allow, I would slow to let the car out, that way I have taken control of the situation and kept myself safe. If I am in slow moving traffic and pedestrians are trying to cross the road I would hold back to allow them to cross. To me it is not a question of rights but common sense which often seems to be lacking these days.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pavement priority
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 09:48 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
I agree that compulsory cycle proficiency tests prior to holding a 'licence to ride' whilst it may 'force' correct behaviour to start with, many will still gain bad habits and the enforcement and admin to get it off the ground would possibly make more people then cycling illegally !
There are far too many bureaucratic levels already.
What we have 'lost' is the morals to 'do the right thing', and the severe lack of promotion of 'what the right behaviours are', and good straight forward policing!
That way instead of many bad habits continuing they would have been nipped in the bud or people themselves can see they are behaving badly.

The vast majority of us have had experience prior to becoming adults, of walking and to some degree cycling.

The lorry drivers and motorcyclists could equally state that before driving a car we must all drive lorries too, to help appreciate another persons position more fully. But, isn't the reality that we just need a huge dose of courtesy and consideration ?

On another note I think it great that some places offer experiences to drive diggers, lorries and other large vehicle appliances !But do we really 'need' it when it is only a few that find this empathy hard?

I'd also video his actions and show him, many people do not always realise how their actions can look from the 'outside' and that can change people often with immediate effect.
If he is endangering life, then just possibly a call to the local Police and ask them to have a word with him ? Some of the community neighborhood Police (& I mean real Police-persons) could help. Although I'd try everything else first! Including telling him that if he didn't change then he'd 'leave me no choice'.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pavement priority
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:22 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
I agree that compulsory cycle proficiency tests prior to holding a 'licence to ride' whilst it may 'force' correct behaviour to start with,

I have taught several young people to drive and I have found that the ones who were regular cyclists learn to cope with traffic very quickly. But, I do agree, that my suggestion would not be practical

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pavement priority
PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 03:29 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
When we look at the facts, we had the safest roads in the world until '93 then we started to slide ... all we had was a reasonable driving / riding test with no theory and non of the 'car checks', now that we have all that we have worse road standards.
It is not about regulation but mostly about attitude and an understanding of others (courtesy). It seems all too easy for people to fall into a selfish 'me, me' attitude when on the road, but happily not the majority.
How and why it forms would be good to appreciate and understand to try and curtail it, and then help to prevent it from occurring in the first place.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.068s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]