Thinking about the O/P again and breaking my new year’s resolution for a miinute not to post so much... The moment any vehicle starts to move it has ‘a speed’ which can damage, so the corollary to that statement is speed therefore is the killer. But that is as misleading as saying knives kill, not the person wielding the knife. As long as the speed is zero and so long as the knife never leaves the drawer they can never kill – fact! So far so good, except that in the
real world we need knives just as we need speed in order to function properly.
To continue with the analogy someone might argue “yes we need speed but just not a fast speed”. Okay then, let’s run with that... A chef just needs to cut food, so issue plastic knives and ban all metal ones. Well, why not? I have cut through some damn tough meat with a serrated plastic knife many times, works very well actually, better than some metal ones I own. We may need to come up with a new range of plastic knives, with longer better ones, but given the current crime wave surrounding knife crime it’s a price well worth paying, (even if it saves just
one life), just like speed reduction – correct?
Well it’s complete nonsense of course and even to this day the research by the Government is at best scant and at worst scandalous! The public deserve to be informed and given the facts; not deceived! The ‘Speed Kills’ message is now so ingrained in the public mind and imagination that the multitude of other factors are all but overlooked.
The public do not know, and many would simply not understand or care, about the important role of Return To The Mean or Bias On Selection. (I admit I didn’t until I came to Safe Speed). The Government and local authorities knows all this and uses it to their advantage to skew the results in their favour along with public paranoia about speed being responsible for the majority of accidents. They could introduce a blanket

across every town and city in the country and get away with it under the speed kills ‘safety’ umbrella. Who in power would dare hold their heads above the parapet to argue against it?
The argument could simply go like this, and sounds as though it
is in Nottinghamshire: Speed Kills so if reducing

to

is good, then reducing it further down to

is better and then down to

or less is better still.

Well done Northamptionshire
You can’t argue with that because as you approach zero you cannot get hurt by a stationary vehicle unless someone deliberately bangs their head on it. But of course there is so much more to it than that, as we know!
That 20mph past a school at 3:00 pm during home time is vastly more dangerous than 80 or 90 mph down an empty and open stretch of dual carriageway. The truth deniers don’t like to hear this; rubs them up the wrong way every time. So “Speed Kills” has become this infernal ‘truth’ but until the true causes of KSI are understood you can never hope to improve road safety,
especially with a dumb sound bite like that!