Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Oct 26, 2025 15:11

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 305 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 16  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:45 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
GreenShed wrote:
Here we go again.
We will no doubt see this repeated again-and-again and suddenly it will become an established figure.
Joyriders and TWOC, theft , [...] were not figuring at a high number in the collisions in police records.

What are you on? IIRC there were 56 fatalities arising from police chases alone in 2007; there were likely more joyrider fatals who weren't being chased. I think it is fair to say these guys were going a bit quick, so there's a few percent right there. Now they may not feature high in police records (that's another claim you pulled out of the air), but they do feature significantly in the speeding portion of the casualty stats; this is the point of relevance. Cameras can't do much against this dangerous driver group can they?

GreenShed wrote:
[...]drunks and drugged were not figuring at a high number in the collisions in police records

In terms of fatal and serious accidents (you know, 'casualties'), these feature as much as exceeding the speed limit [RCGB2007, table 4b].

GreenShed wrote:
You can't keep making these figures up.

Like you did with your 50% claim? At least we give reasonable qualitive explanations, which is more than anyone can say for you.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 18:49 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Quite. But he's thinking about his career.
Note that the con party have already said they're going to have a bonfire of add-on non-governmental "public service" jobs when they get in. Going by their last bonfire at least 600,000 will go. I think we can safely say that the safety partnerships will go. Hopefully they will be closely followed by various trusts.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 06:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
graball wrote:
Now if the MAJORITYOF DRIVERS feel this way, shouldn't the government be doing something constructive about speed limits and putting them into the category where the MAJORITY of drivers don't feel the need to exceed them?



So, is the majority of drivers the majority of people all of a sudden?

If the majority of shoplifters wanted it to be made easier to shoplift would you give them what they want?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 07:38 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
How much do people who don't drive really know about road safety??? I don't ride horses , so wouldn't attempt to comment on what safe horse riding practice might be.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 07:57 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
So, is the majority of drivers the majority of people all of a sudden?

If the majority of shoplifters wanted it to be made easier to shoplift would you give them what they want?


Once again, it is quite obvious that Weepej puts shoplifters (criminals) and drivers in the same category. Am I missing something here or does Weepej assume all drivers to be criminally minded?

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 08:07 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
graball wrote:
Quote:
So, is the majority of drivers the majority of people all of a sudden?

If the majority of shoplifters wanted it to be made easier to shoplift would you give them what they want?


Once again, it is quite obvious that Weepej puts shoplifters (criminals) and drivers in the same category. Am I missing something here or does Weepej assume all drivers to be criminally minded?


If you choose to break the law you are a criminal. If you inadvertently break a law of absolute liability you are a criminal.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 08:09 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
He's just pointing-out that both shoplifters and motorists traveling faster than the speed limit are criminals: Officially.
Speeding is a criminal offence !

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 08:13 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
But by comparing the majority of shoplifters to the majority of drivers, can we really take this person seriously. The majority of drivers are law abiding normal people, whereas the majority of shop lifter.....well!


Surely the majority of drivers know more about what constitutes a safe speed limit than the the few office bound beurocrats that make these ridiculous limits that are sprouting every where.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 08:45 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Then you have cases where authorities go against police advice when setting speed limits (warwickshire and norfolk). Should the real road safety experts, the police, be ignored by these office bound "know alls"?

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 09:30 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
weepej wrote:
So, is the majority of drivers the majority of people all of a sudden?

They are the majority of people on the roads in question; indeed non-drivers need no say on motorway policies.

The longer the authorities ignore the will of the majority, the more their rules will be brought into disrepute and will be increasingly ignored by the majority.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:15 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Steve wrote:
The longer the authorities ignore the will of the majority, the more their rules will be brought into disrepute and will be increasingly ignored by the majority.


While democracy must obey the will of the majority, no democracy can work effectively without protecting the rights of the minority. The minority in this case being the non motoring road users.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:30 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
dcbwhaley wrote:
While democracy must obey the will of the majority, no democracy can work effectively without protecting the rights of the minority. The minority in this case being the non motoring road users.

On motorways?

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:39 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Steve wrote:
dcbwhaley wrote:
While democracy must obey the will of the majority, no democracy can work effectively without protecting the rights of the minority. The minority in this case being the non motoring road users.

On motorways?


No, of course not. Is this thread confined to discussion of speeding on Motorways?

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:51 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
dcbwhaley wrote:
No, of course not. Is this thread confined to discussion of speeding on Motorways?

Your reply was in response to my prior post which was about motorways; It seemed (to me) that I should clarify this.

So how do you feel about the 'majority' issue on motorways?

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 13:01 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Steve wrote:
So how do you feel about the 'majority' issue on motorways?


I am not quite sure what you ar proposing. That there should be a referendum amongst motorway users to set the speed limit. Would that be on a per motorway basis?

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 13:56 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
dcbwhaley wrote:
I am not quite sure what you ar proposing. That there should be a referendum amongst motorway users to set the speed limit.

If YouGov/Admiral's survey is anything to go by - I think the referendum is already done.

Is it right that the limit should be increased to reflect the wishes of the majority of its users? (who are already safely ignoring the current one anyway)

dcbwhaley wrote:
Would that be on a per motorway basis?

That's a good question.
Finger in the air, I tend towards saying no (i.e. have a blanket rise) otherwise it gets a bit complicated, although perhaps a raised limit should initially apply only at off peak times.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 14:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 17:37
Posts: 702
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Steve wrote:
dcbwhaley wrote:
While democracy must obey the will of the majority, no democracy can work effectively without protecting the rights of the minority. The minority in this case being the non motoring road users.

On motorways?


Some might feel that passengers in cars travelling on motorways have a legitimate view on it, but it's not one that I would press too strongly.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 15:03 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
TripleS wrote:
Some might feel that passengers in cars travelling on motorways have a legitimate view on it, but it's not one that I would press too strongly.

This is very true and was something I did already consider (honestly). I don't think the majority of motorway drivers carry passengers with them (that purely a subjective recollection on my part) and a portion of passengers are motorways drivers anyway, so I wrote off this factor as insignificant.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 15:51 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
I don't agre with car passengers who are non drivers being able to regulate motorway speeds. Unless they drive, they don't know the first thing about car/motorway safety.

I travel by train and plane a lot but would never dream of poking my nose into the affairs of rail/flight safety because, frankly I don't have a clue, so have sufficient intelligence to know that I shouldn't even try, for fear of making a total "cockup", which is exactly what we are seeing on the roads right now.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 20:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Quote:
While democracy must obey the will of the majority, no democracy can work effectively without protecting the rights of the minority. The minority in this case being the non motoring road users.


How far do you have to go protecting minority rights, before you get to the stage that the rights of the majority are threatened ?
I used to take my children walking around a wood....now my children cannot take THEIR children walking around those same woods because the woods are now used by gay men looking for sex with other gay men......it gets a bit difficult trying to answer the question "why is that man wearing a skirt dad"
As I said: The rights of the minorities are being protected to the exclusion of the majority. In every field of life.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 305 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.104s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]