Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jan 25, 2026 19:18

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:45 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
dcbwhaley wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
]Tin-foil hat time.


A detailed and closely reasoned argument, not. If that is your level of debate I am not surprised that you are unable to engage with my subtle reasoning and rapier like wit. :)


Yeah... :roll:

_________________
Regulation without education merely creates more criminals.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:54 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Mole wrote:
Steve wrote:
Mole wrote:
The legal limit for a new car being type approved is 6.43ms^-2 with the clutch in or 5.76ms^-s with the engine connected.

Wow! I wouldn’t have thought that limit would be so low. Still, it’s fairly consistent with the figures given in the Highway Code.


i'll leave you to guess what the requirement for hand brakes is...... i.e. your emergency secondary braking system :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 15:52 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
RobinXe wrote:
dcbwhaley wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
]Tin-foil hat time.


A detailed and closely reasoned argument, not. If that is your level of debate I am not surprised that you are unable to engage with my subtle reasoning and rapier like wit. :)


Yeah... :roll:


Are you going to justify your accusation that I pigeon-holed you?

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 21:29 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
ed_m wrote:
i'll leave you to guess what the requirement for hand brakes is...... i.e. your emergency secondary braking system :wink:


Aye, that's a bit of an eye opener - or, indeed, the requirements for the failed servo test and only one half of a split braking system! Do you have any sort of gut feeling for a typical deceleration vs time graph for an "ordinary" car stopping as hard as possible from (say) 80? I was talking to someone who works for a major manufacturer today and was told that they put their hazards on automatically at about 0.65G deceleration - which backs up your earlier comment that 0.9 is REALLY "standing on the anchors".


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 22:57 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
RobinXe wrote:
dcbwhaley wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
]Tin-foil hat time.


A detailed and closely reasoned argument, not. If that is your level of debate I am not surprised that you are unable to engage with my subtle reasoning and rapier like wit. :)


Yeah... :roll:


Good. Now try words of two syllables :o

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 23:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
dcbwhaley wrote:
I cannot help forming the impression that the knifes are out for anyone who dares to challenge he views of the established members.

I respectfully dissagree dcbwhaley.

SS examines the facts which many treat as fiction. But the truth fears no question and I have never seen SS shy from any genuine question/er concerning road safety with opposing views.

Indeed, I have witnessed posters and posts tolerated here which would never be tolerated elsewhere.

Tony

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 07:34 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Big Tone wrote:
dcbwhaley wrote:
I cannot help forming the impression that the knifes are out for anyone who dares to challenge he views of the established members.

I respectfully dissagree dcbwhaley.

SS examines the facts which many treat as fiction. But the truth fears no question and I have never seen SS shy from any genuine question/er concerning road safety with opposing views.


That is true. You do allow that. But nevertheless posters whose views do not accord with the majority can expect a savage response.

I have been called a "neo-Nazi corporate-fascist" for extolling the environmental advantages of public transport (and called precious and over-sensitive when I complained to the moderator who declined to admonish the poster who said that).
My professional standing and work ethic was impugned when I tried to defend the public sector's involvement in road safety ( and was castigated by the moderator when I mounted a vigorous defence)
I have been called a "Freak" for discussing, in General Chat, the local level of rainfall (and again been admonished for returning the insult)

But what prompted the quote at the top was this. I said that I thought that I differed from many on what I considered a safe speed. Steve invited me to expand on that and I did so, albeit not very well. In return I was savaged by RobinXe whom accused me of an ad hominem attack on him.

That does sound like I am whingeing but not so. My back is broad and , wrapped in the cloak of righteousness, I can take a lot of flak :D ( I wish that certain other posters could take criticism with the same ease as they give it). But it does rather give the lie to your protestations of tolerance.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 09:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Speaking as someone who knows what it is to be flamed, (which I won't go into), I have seen nothing here which could be regarded as anything more than very tame by comparision and let's not forget, it does work both ways. ;)

It's common on most forums for the dominant clique to react defensively against anything seen as arrogance, unjustified criticism or sometimes if they just don't like the way you 'smell'. I admit I have on occasion done this, borne from frustration at what I have taken to be deliberate missrepresentation of SS or subtle attacks at the glaringly obvious.

But then I never said I was perfect :P

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 09:54 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Quote:
It's common on most forums for the dominant clique to react defensively against anything seen as arrogance, unjustified criticism or sometimes if they just don't like the way you 'smell'.


Quite :x

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 17:38 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
dcbwhaley wrote:
Quote:
It's common on most forums for the dominant clique to react defensively against anything seen as arrogance, unjustified criticism or sometimes if they just don't like the way you 'smell'.


Quite :x

That wasn't a critisizm of SS or you, just a personal observation based on my experience of attending the University of Forums. :roll:

(BTW by "smell" I mean an almost 6th sense I've noticed some here have for detecting alterior motives which I'm not the best at picking-up on). Argument on forums, sometimes heated, is a part of the process which is not really so different to real life; in families or Parliment for example. Winston Churchill and Lady Astor often had a full and frank exchange of words. :lol:

IMO, SS strikes a perfect balance between freedom of speech and out-and-out flaming. If you want to know how bad it can get I can point you to one or two places where you could become toast. :o

Image

But as I've said before, we are in danger of arguing more about the ingredients than the cake. So what do you really think about speed kills? Is it really that simple?

BTW. As someone who came in on this thread late and read it from the start, 9 pages ago, all I saw way back on page 1 was you calling odin a freak. To someone, anyone, coming in fresh it would look like you started it or at the least are bearing a grudge from something else. In his replies back to you he was civil, you were not.

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 14:12 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Quote:
So what do you really think about speed kills? Is it really that simple?

Is anything really that simple, Oscar? :)

Quote:
In his replies back to you he was civil, you were not.

I feel no obligation to be civil to people who are advancing idiotic arguments

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 16:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
Quote:
I feel no obligation to be civil to people who are advancing idiotic arguments


Or indeed to offer any proof that they are idiotic it would seem.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 18:58 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
A break from the negativity...

I've been meaning to thank you Mole for your earlier reply to me. Numbers always do it for me Image
:drink:

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 97 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.058s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]