Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 14:01

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 15:16 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Oscar wrote:
Only because us proper drivers have learned the signs, i.e. erratic steering, up and down on the throttle, flickering brake lights, etc,,, and give them a very wide berth! :twisted:


Oh good, that means no-one will notice if I decide to use mine :P

I notice that tinted windows seem to be more popular on repmobiles since the phone ban.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 15:36 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
The Rush wrote:

Quote:
And nobody has managed to satisfactorily explain why it's not dangerous for truckers to use CB radios or emergency services to use their 2 way radios but somehow it's dangerous for "Joe Public" to use a phone!

Emergency services, commercial drivers, law enforcement, and taxi drivers all volunteer for additional driver training, at least here in the States.



Does that mean this problem can be overcome by appropriate training then?

Surely not! :wink:

Next thing you'll be suggesting it's sometimes safe to exceed the speed limit if you're a police-trained driver!

The mobile call in the driving test is a good idea but I think it will be very easy to train all but the dimmest applicants to "do the right thing" just for the test. It's like when I took my test. We only have one set of unmarked crossroads within reach of the driving test centre so everyone knew that as soon as they went into a particular area, it was because they were going to be taken on the "unmarked crossroads" route!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 16:17 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Quote:
Research suggests as many as half a million motorists a day use hand-held mobile phones while driving.

Please show me the statistics for the half a million crashes per day to back up the danger claims.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 16:42 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 17:12
Posts: 618
Location: Borough of Queens, NYC, NY USA
Even if the problem can't be overcome by proper training in and of itself, it doesn't mean that failing to cover info that you could be tested on at anytime is proper. Just because ignorance of the law is no excuse doesn't excuse or endorse a testing standard that is not only abysmally low, but increasingly anachronistic.
The absolute minimum requirements of training and testing should always be changing to suit the times, and should never give the impression that the bar is falling.
Quote:
Next thing you'll be suggesting it's sometimes safe to exceed the speed limit if you're a police-trained driver!
True, Emergency Vehicle Operations Courses are useless without the proper uniform. I wonder why civilians are ever allowed to take them ... :wink:

I, personally, could live with the negatives if the NYS L-Test was administered in Manhattan, but then again, does a guy who drives 750 miles a week really know anything?

_________________
The Rules for ALL ROAD USERS:
1) No one gets hurt
2) Nothing gets hit, except to protect others; see Rule#1
3) The Laws of Physics are invincible and immutable - so-called 'laws' of men are not
4) You are always immediately and ultimately responsible for your safety first, then proximately responsible for everyone's
Do not let other road users' mistakes become yours, nor yours become others
5) The rest, including laws of the land, is thoughtful observation, prescience, etiquette, decorum, and cooperation


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:50 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
The Rush wrote:
Here's an idea: during the L-Test, the student gets a phonecall with no ID (this call is part of the L-Test). If the driver either:
safely pulls over to answer the phone, or
hands the phone to the proctor, and says, "answer this for me, please?"
Perfect answer.

If the student stops at a redlight or other traffic control device where they will not impede another's progress for at least 30 seconds, receives this anonymous call, answers the phone, and says something like, "can I/you call you/me back?", "would you text it to me?", or, "hold on a moment while I pull over"
Good answer.

What about just ignoring it. Is this a perfect, good or just indifferent response?

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Ignore a call?
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 13:09 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 17:12
Posts: 618
Location: Borough of Queens, NYC, NY USA
I suppose that, today, you could customize the ringtone so that you've a better idea of whether or not to answer.

Sure, why not? If it's really important, they'll either txt you, or keep calling you until you can either pull over or answer when it's safe to do so.

Some people who don't know or understand choice theory feel compelled to answer a ringing phone, but the driver must resist that compulsion when more urgent demands on attention exist.

The point is that the tester must observe that the driver's priorities are in order.

_________________
The Rules for ALL ROAD USERS:
1) No one gets hurt
2) Nothing gets hit, except to protect others; see Rule#1
3) The Laws of Physics are invincible and immutable - so-called 'laws' of men are not
4) You are always immediately and ultimately responsible for your safety first, then proximately responsible for everyone's
Do not let other road users' mistakes become yours, nor yours become others
5) The rest, including laws of the land, is thoughtful observation, prescience, etiquette, decorum, and cooperation


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 13:31 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
I wonder what proportion of convictions has resulted from people making calls whilst stuck in traffic jams - easy pickings?

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 16:04 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
I hate seeing people driving with a phone clamped to their ear but even I know the law was written incorrectly in that it's an offence to use one while the engine is running (even if you are parked).

It should have been while the car is in motion only.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 16:12 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
Pete317 wrote:
I wonder what proportion of convictions has resulted from people making calls whilst stuck in traffic jams - easy pickings?


Small? Bearing in mind the police in their cars would also be stuck in the jam. Unless someone is dim and unobservant enough as to spark up a conversation in full view of the feds.
Hmm, perhaps its quite a lot then :twisted:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 16:17 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
malcolmw wrote:
I hate seeing people driving with a phone clamped to their ear...

Don't even go to Florida. :twisted:

Rigpig wrote:
Pete317 wrote:
I wonder what proportion of convictions has resulted from people making calls whilst stuck in traffic jams - easy pickings?


Small? Bearing in mind the police in their cars would also be stuck in the jam. Unless someone is dim and unobservant enough as to spark up a conversation in full view of the feds.
Hmm, perhaps its quite a lot then :twisted:

I thought they 'enforced' this law with their spy cameras? There's hundreds of them on motorways. I even noticed that a small town near me has been infested with them too now! :(

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 119 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.076s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]