Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 17, 2025 02:25

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 21:02 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
weepej wrote:
Barkstar wrote:
The Darwin Awards are aimed at those who remove themselves from the gene pool through stupidity or folly. Would you accept a lift from complete strangers at 3am? Would it be unwise to do so?


Suggesting the girls that accepted the lift deserved what they got? That's abonimable.



Weepy // my comments do not disrespect you. The girls did not deserve death or injury. Those men are 100% to blame here. They chose to do as they did. Fear because of thei rpast?

Sheer disregard of the law or their lives or the lives of those innocent girls? Girls with a misguided sense of fun or misguided idea of decent minded male appreciation of their femininity? I give away my taste.. but I appreciate a woman who lets me imagine.. a woman like my own lovely wife. I feel a sense of mixed pride.. protectiveness and possessive jealousy when I note the appreciative eyes of others on her :lol: I give you something personal about me here :wink: I fear I embarrass my wife .. but I love her .. to coin a phrase.. truly..madly .. deeply :oops: :fastasleep:


I am saying I do feel for those girls.. but accept they were still silly girls :roll:

Weepy .. when I was about 4 or 5 years old in the 60s - and in the last days of proper steam trains and the early diesels (nostalgia moment - most of which I had as part of a Christmas present railway set .. complete with Pullman coaches :cloud9 .. and I still have this set .. in the attic - lovingly and imaginatively played with by my own young sons :cloud9:)

Anyway .. back in the days when police and teachers and parents were allowed to give you a sharp smack on the backside or legs without fear of prosecution for "assault on the person" :popcorn: - there were a few adverts on the telly - aimed at curious little boys like me and probably IG too.

One was the warning about playing near railway lines. I recall it showed a boy aged about 11 or 12 years. He climbed over the fencing .. ignoring the "KEEP OUT DANGER!!!!" sign. We saw the boy on climbing up onto a bridge .. then heard a scream and the hoot of the train.. and saw lots of steam. We were left in no doubt as to what had happened.. especially when the voice at the end said in avery stern and sarcastic voice "Dead .. and all because he ignored the warning signs". :roll: (the tone was such that you were convinced that only a stupid fool would die that way .... and it was enough to impress upon me at a very young age that some die as a result of stupidity. I think it made a lasting impression on me. I did not want "he died as stupid" as my epitaph. :popcorn:

A similar one was about accepting sweets and lifts from strangers. The same sarcasm that only "daft people do such things" prevailed. It was the same genre as the "wooden top" information adverts aimed at the drivers of the day. :wink: Sarcastic ..imply only the terminally stupid would do such stupid acts. I think they worked for most of the educated/progressive types.. but the chavs of that era are as the chavs of today's era as in "thick beyond most comprehension .. yet cunning enough to play both the legal and benefit systems :roll:

So let's be realistic about the mindset here. In the past .. they were blunt. I think nothing wrong in that approach. It had lasting memorable effect .. and a stark message.

Now that does not at all mean that these girls deserved death because they accepted a lift from a pair of perhaps affable and - I would speculate to be likeable - young rogues with a dashing SA and corresponding line in "pulling patter". They were of a criminal inclination .. violently so if the report in the MEN is correct. Why they panicked and ran in reality - especially if one was due incourt and this pull perhaps would add to his sentence. So I am prepared to accept an element of fear of outcome as partly explaining their actions.

But whilst these girls //. single mums ...were enjoying a night out into the early hours of Sunday morning.. they had each babies at home. Children demand and parental duties require us to give up the "singleton lifestyle/dinky lifestyle". Kids mean we cannot be "all night stop-outs" or "leave them in hotel bedrooms asleep" as the McCann family discovered to their eternal nightmare. Pray to God still .. for Madeleine's return or her soul's peace

Single mums. WE foster their children on short term. We return happy children to them. We then get these same children returned to us for further respite.. "in some distress". We think we go around in ever decreasing circles here :roll:

I cannot take these kids on long term. We take on some really difficult cases as long term fosters .. current one being an "asperger sufferer" whose single mother simply cannot cope. He's a lovely child. Likeable. Engaging. Charming.

But I am aware of the difficulty which these young single mums face. They are teenagers. They want the same life as other teenagers...but I am not naive as to why they might have accepted a lift from these rogues all the same. It does not mean they "deserved death or serious injury" - but that prudence and regard for their babies and parents looking after these children also deserved their respect.

Of course I feel for these girls and their grieving families .. but I still question their common sense all the same..


I have hopefully instilled into my own sons and daughters (including all fostered children to date) some semblance of common sense/morality/ethics.

Both me and my wife try bloody hard to make that difference. We think we succeed .. but these children have long lifetimes ahead of them - in which they can make silly decisions . We hope we have steered them to safety led and legally minded decency .. but still fostered an enquiring mind within them :wink:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 23:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Mad Moggie wrote:
Those men are 100% to blame here.



I agree, but if the police had not chased then they would all still be around, most likely.

Difficult.

Makes me wonder if we should fit all motor vehciles with secure remote operated kill switches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 01:00 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 00:42
Posts: 310
Location: North West England
weepej wrote:
I agree, but if the police had not chased then they would all still be around, most likely.


They bought attention to themselves running a red light. Which in itself is odd because I'd guess one of the reasons the a*****e 'borrowed' a repmobile in the first place was because it would probably draw less attention. Thing is, as IG has said, what do they do? We've all seen the cops on the box who do a stop for a minor offence and find allsorts.

As for your other post, well my US friend was a far more eloquent defender than me, and I've been called worse.

But two quick quite personal stories to back up my reasoning for seeming a heartless b******d:

Many years ago I occasionally went to the more mainstream nightclubs in the area with a couple of mates. One aways drove as he was no drinker. And on more than one occasion girls would quite happily get into our car for a lift or to carry on partying. They did it with barely a second thought. Except once two girls were about to get in when a friend of theirs suggested it might not be a good idea and they changed their minds. We knew they'd come to no harm but they didn't.

Wind forward a decade and a good friend is a part time lecturer. On of his students was out late in town with friends. She's offered a lift from a complete stranger. Her friends plead with her not to go on her own. She ignored them. She was found the next day in a pub's wheelie bin.

Some people are foolish and never knew how close they came, some live to tell the tale and some don't. That's life and the outcome of decisions we make.

Barkstar

_________________
The difference between intelligence and stupidity is that intelligence has limits.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 02:09 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
weepej wrote:

Makes me wonder if we should fit all motor vehciles with secure remote operated kill switches.


Yes. Then half the country would stop if they couldn't recall the code for a single vehicle.


Quote:
The Daily Mirror were reporting this week that 99.99 per cent of cops are let of speeding tickets.

A Freedom of Information application showed that police cars set off speed cameras 107,000 times in the last year, but only 150 police officers received tickets. *

Sarah Fatica from the road safety charity “Brake” said the figures were “incredibly worrying“. I’d agree, very worrying for victims of violent crime that there is a call for police vehicles to slow down & stick to the limits.

Last week we had a job where a lady on her own had been woken up in the middle of the night by the sound of a door opening. She dialled 999. I sent all 3 cars available to me & a couple of traffic cars also made their way. Every single one of them went through 1 set of speed cameras & 3 of them went through 2. That’s 11 of those 107,000 activations.

They went on a silent approach just in case whoever had opened the lady’s door was still in the area; we didn’t really want him/them to hear us coming from 2 miles away at 3 in the morning.

The first car which arrived on the scene drove past a VW Golf which was wheel-spinning out of the lady’s street in the opposite direction. The second car which arrived turned just as the Golf was driving past & was able to neatly slot in behind it. Within 3 minutes both traffic cars were behind the Golf, which refused to stop, they all went back through the speed cameras the other way.

To cut a long story short, we followed the Golf until it turned into a cul-de-sac & they 3 male occupants tried to run off. Two were caught by the car & another was chased down by PC Speedy about 200 yards down the road.

They’d burgled 3 houses in 3 different towns & had property from 2 of them still in the car.

By my reckoning we activated the speed cameras maybe 24 times on that one incident & it only lasted 7 or 8 minutes.

I really don’t think many police drivers are driving around at high speed for the fun of it; in our force, if you go through a speed camera, it better be documented on a current log or you can expect a ticket. I sometimes get very frustrated during an incident when I’m trying to direct resources, or pass & receive information when some officer who isn’t really at the sharp end of the job calls up to have it documented that although he’s still 5 miles from the scene, he’s just gone through a speed camera in the next town. But I understand why they do it, they’re arse-covering so they don’t get a ticket.

I think I’ve probably mentioned this before, but I wonder what everyone’s reaction would be if we drove everywhere at 30mph. We’d not catch as many people, prevent fewer injuries & deaths, but at least it would keep the Daily Mirror off our backs.

* mind you, the Mirror can’t seem to get it’s figures correct, in an article in August 2008, it said that in 2006 the police set off the cameras 900,000 times. I’d have thought a reduction of nearly 800,000 in just 2 years would be applauded. But I expect, being the Mirror, that neither figure is actually correct.


http://200weeks.police999.com/

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.023s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]