Ernest Marsh wrote:
Take 'em as you find 'em!
We did at first Ernest, and everything appeared to be going rather well.
My friend & I were originally (allegedly) stopped for doing 46-48 in a 40 zone (London Rd, Waterlooville) on Saturday the 23rd April 2005. We hadn't been anywhere near the alledged higher speed of 48, although instead of arguing the toss my friend spoke to the officer (PS Voller) and stated that although he knew he had breached the 40 limit, he considered his driving to be safe & he certainly didn't consider his driving to be a danger to other road users because there was nobody else on the road (except the power crazed twat behind us).
My friend was then asked if he had been drinking, to which he replied he had consumed 1 single Vodka & Coke prior to leaving Horndean (a 5 minute trip from Waterlooville).
The officer asked if my friend would provide a breath sample, to which he replied that he would be happy to do so. The officer then went on to explain the "20 minute rule", and then said he would do a person & vehicle check while we waited.
My friend furnished his details to the officer, who upon his return stated that my friend was disqualified from driving and was being arrested.
At this point my friend said to the officer "for f*ck sakes mate, how many times are you lot going to keep arresting me for this?" and went on to explain that he had already been in court so many times for this (and acquitted) and it was in fact an erroneous entry on the PNC (Police National Computer).
At this point, PS Voller said to my friend "Get in the car & shut it, c*nts like you shouldn't be on the road anyway"
Needless to say this had the most unexpected (unexpected for Voller) result of my friend responding "who the f*ck do you think you are talking to, you fat c*nt".
Things took a real nosedive at Waterlooville police station, and eventually my friend was thrown in to a cell and left there until the morning.
On the Sunday morning, my friend was interviewed and the officers said to him "Why did you refuse to provide a breath sample last night?"
My friend stated that he did not refuse any such request, and that he had been arrested for another offence during the 20 minute wait period and the breathalyser had not been forthcoming.
The officer then said "No, I mean why did you refuse the sample we asked for last night while you were in custody?"
My friends response was "You lot never asked me for anything, you simply used the solid cuffs as a weapon to break my wrist and then threw me in a cell when I clumped the twat who had assaulted me"
The case eventually got to court this year at Southampton Magistrates, and PS Voller swore on oath that he had taken my friend through the official procedure for requesting a breath specimen and that request had been met with violence. The violence itself was allegedly backed up by CCTV evidence from the custody area of Waterlooville police station.
When the tape was eventually played to the court, while it did indeed show my friend fighting with the old bill, it also showed that PS Voller had NOT requested anything in the custody area at all.
Now if it hadn't been for that CCTV tape, then my friend would currently be banned for failing to provide a breath sample as there is no way on earth he would have been able to disprove what PS Voller was saying.
An official complaint was made, and this was escalated to the IPCC after the investigating inspector (Mark Alleman) not only told lies in a recorded phone call in order to back up his officers lies, but also followed the lies up in a letter addressed to my friend.
I haven't got a clue how the investigation is continuing (if it is continuing at all), but I do know that PS Voller (lying c*nt that he is) is still in the job, and is no doubt trying to fit more people up.
That is the calibre of the British Police Force
WANKERS, the absolute lot of them!