Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 10, 2025 04:54

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 20:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 01:32
Posts: 240
SafeSpeed wrote:
ndp wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
ndp wrote:
I thought Safe Speed was for limits which are set consitantly with each other and with the circumstances?


You bet. That excludes 20mph speed limits that appeal to social engineers! :)


On what is that statement based?


It's a quip based on a series of false priorities that I perceive.

- social and ideological values dressed up as safety values
- anti-car policies dressed up as safety policies
- road safety values governed by dogma rather than sound science
- excessive trust in the number; insufficient trust in responsible behaviour.


I would suggest there may be a grain of truth in that perception, nevertheless it is only a perception.

Quote:
I see little or no value in 20mph speed limits because controlling speed to ~ 20mph actually takes far too much driver attention. This, of course, is why DfT says that 20mph zones should be 'self enforcing'. I think we could usefully have 'slow zones' or something like that, but the number is just a serious bloody distraction.


I have sympathy with that (I personally prefer Home Zones as a concept).

However, there are reasons for the 20 figure. For a start, how slow is slow? What when people complain of damage to vehicles because they have passed over/through traffic calming measures to fast? Don't forget there is no requirement for any warning of humps etc in 20 zones.

If they're told what the maximum speed is, then its cleared up. You can't really complain. Not ideal, but such is reality in Britain today.

Quote:
And the gloss of legitimacy makes 20mph a wholly illegitimate target for many.


Whilst I understand the concern, is there evidence to suggest this actually happens?

Quote:
In lots of 20mph zones, 20mph will still be murderously fast (from time to time). If 20mph (or 30mph or 70mph) can frequently be murderously fast, what will save us? What does save us? It can only be appropriate behaviour. Let's have more appropriate behaviour please. Let's have policies that value appropriate behaviour.


What do you do with those who show no interest in behaving appropriately?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 21:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
ndp wrote:
What do you do with those who show no interest in behaving appropriately?


Punish them.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 03:21 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
ndp wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
It's a quip based on a series of false priorities that I perceive.

- social and ideological values dressed up as safety values
- anti-car policies dressed up as safety policies
- road safety values governed by dogma rather than sound science
- excessive trust in the number; insufficient trust in responsible behaviour.


I would suggest there may be a grain of truth in that perception, nevertheless it is only a perception.


No. It's a series of deadly mistakes that are killing thousands.


ndp wrote:
Quote:
And the gloss of legitimacy makes 20mph a wholly illegitimate target for many.


Whilst I understand the concern, is there evidence to suggest this actually happens?


I don't think it's been studied as such, but put yourself in the shoes of a typical motorist. The only daily experience of official road safety is driving past a load of threatening speed cameras. The very presence of the cameras says: "you'll be OK if you're not exceeding the speed limit".

Police officers tell me that when they attend a crash the most common claim from motorists is: "It's not my fault, I wasn't speeding."

This is 'culture damage' and distortion of safety priorities on a grand scale.

ndp wrote:
Quote:
In lots of 20mph zones, 20mph will still be murderously fast (from time to time). If 20mph (or 30mph or 70mph) can frequently be murderously fast, what will save us? What does save us? It can only be appropriate behaviour. Let's have more appropriate behaviour please. Let's have policies that value appropriate behaviour.


What do you do with those who show no interest in behaving appropriately?


That's what roads policing is for.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.015s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]