Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Jul 01, 2026 07:12

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 20:54 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 19:53
Posts: 234
Not half as much as it worries me, setting up for a nice left-hander and all of a sudden there's an oncoming 4x4 half on my side of the road!
Bottyburp- definitely do the Bikesafe day!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 23:06 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
JT wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
pogo wrote:
BlackadderTF wrote:
What do you do when a pensioner comes around the bend on the wrong side of the road at NSL? Airbags arn't going to save you from that one.

Assuming that there isn't a tree in the way - head for the scenery, it's softer than an oncoming vehicle.

Not around here it's not! Lots of rocks and stone walls which are NOT held together with cement. Lots of visitors assume if you hit them they fall down. They do, but not without a fight!

Actually, never mind Armco, dry stone walls are one of the neatest progressively deforming barriers around. Whilst there is clearly the risk of a stone going through the windscreen generally they don't, as the impact tends to throw them away from the car.

I think on balance I'd rather hit a dry stone wall at speed than an Armco barrier.

I would agree - except I have seen a Capri hit the wall at an acute angle, and the rear passengers ended up with a lap full of rocks which came through the side window.
The speed at impact was high, but seatbelts prevented what might otherwise have been a tragedy.

Armco at the same angle would have sent the vehicle along or back out into the road and not reduced the forward momentum in the same way.

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 23:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 19:53
Posts: 234
Many years ago, a friend in deepest rural Somerset advised me:

"If you've got a choice between hitting a brick wall or hitting a tree- aim for the wall!"
Of course, if it's a BIG wall and a little tree that may not be the case, but in general terms I reckon he was right (in a car, anyhow; can't see it would make much difference on a bike, you're dead either way.)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 21:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 13:06
Posts: 116
Safety Engineer wrote:
Biker: "However, subsequent investigations (supported by photographic evidence) proved that a suprisingly large number of these accidents were due to oncoming car drivers taking the "racing line" through the bend, and crossing the white line(s) onto the opposite carriageway, forcing the biker (who was sitting just to the left of the white line, for maximum view into the approaching corner) to swerve and crash."

I have posted on the soapbox regarding this 'Steering Wheel Optional' am seeing more and more of it - it worries me in car !!


I have seen this from the pointy end and its scary. Say you have to dip left to avoid said motorist, you then find what would have been an easy sweeper becoming tight and its like you turned in far to early, half way through the bend you are pointing at a wall and having to make a tighter turn than you intended.

One of the strengths of a bike is the way any given corner on a two way road can be considered 2M+ less tight, in terms of radius, on a bike if you use the full width of the road but it can really suck you in.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 01:58 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
The left hand bend thing is most definately true, now don't get me wrong I still believe that "most" left hander bike accidents are down to the biker but I also believe that "many" of them are down to an approaching driver cutting the corner and some are down to other factors such as road surface.

A few true personal stories to make the point:

I am only still here because of luck; I had been back on a bike for just a few months and completly arsed up a left hander, well actually I was probably in really good shape but it was the first time the pegs had ever touched down and that made me jump, I backed off the throttle stood the bike up a bit and ran wide. My fault, definately down to my innappropriate speed but more for my own ability than the conditions. I was lucky nothing was coming the other way.

Three months later I was burying a friend who ran wide on a bend and wasn't so lucky.

Mrs Patch had just passed her bike test and we were out for our first ride together. Now what you must understand is that although Mrs patch rides an 800cc motorcycle she genuinely does not speed, she rides for her enjoyment and this is achieved at speeds well below the limit (actually well below my level of enjoyment). She also does not take an advanced for view line and whilst taking a left hander in her usual riding in the gutter position, with me following yelling at her in my helmet to pull out a bit so she could see, a truck came around the bend well over halfway across her lane. Now you could argue he'd have seen her if she'd been better placed but I was there and she'd have been scraping me off his radiator if I'd ben in fornt that day.

Just two months ago I was on my regular commute, it was early and although the raods were dry they had been gritted and I was well aware of the question of grip this winter as has been reported on these forums. I was on a left hander well within the safe speed and the front wheel lost all traction. I saved the slide but only by running well wide. I regained control got back on my side of the road just before I became a bonnet ornament. I went back and checked the road I can offer no explaination for the slide, there was no visible reason for the loss of grip. I have taken that bend a zillion times before and a few hundred times since all without incident.

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 02:11 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Patch wrote:
The left hand bend thing is most definately true, now don't get me wrong I still believe that "most" left hander bike accidents are down to the biker but I also believe that "many" of them are down to an approaching driver cutting the corner and some are down to other factors such as road surface.


Don't knock it - it's an excellent excuse to operate closer to the racing line. You know you want to. :hehe:

[just for complete clarity - I am joking - well 90% joking - I think]

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:26 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 02:07
Posts: 242
Now let's see what could be done to reduce some of those accidents:

1. Better road layouts. Some dangerous bends and junctions seemed to appear as a cause of an "unseen vehicle".

2. Regular re-testing, particularly of elderly drivers.

3. Clamp down on drunken driving. I'd like to see longer bans for those over the limit (particularly if over the limit by more than a certain margin). The problem is of course that the road is policed by cameras and they can't breathalyse.

4. New drivers: difficult to know how to handle the urge to take a risk. Speed delimiters aren't really the solution because they would have to adapt to the situation. (Even if set to say 60mph it would not stop the driver using that speed in town).

5. Driver hours: Taxis and minicabs should have similar driver hour restrictions as bus and lorry drivers. At present they have none, and in fact it can be worse because they are paid by the job so there is a tendency to want to drive more hours. Other professions that involve a lot of driving should have restrictions.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.048s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]