smeggy wrote:
the sensible majority wrote:
what and no bikes, no other vehicles, your just proving hat a bunch of excuse making speed freaks are attracted to this site of utter stupidity.
talking of utter stupidity, I clearly and quite deliberately said "straight and clear" it really would be quite obvious if there were other vehicles or bikes - it's just like a real dual carriageway were you can legally do 60 past a cyclist!
Paul, seriously now, can this fool be deleted? He's got back from a night out clearly tanked up and spoiling for a fight
A number of 60 mph zones around here. The main arterial trunk roads support safe cycling.
What we do notice ist that cyclists do not always use the SAFE path provided which run alongside these very fast roads.
A580 - sister in law take drive on this one often. She say the cyclists will ride on road - yet she say she use the path und is well surfaced und safe. Does not take her out of her way und lead to off -road short cut which mean she travel in record time to Manchester und Bolton.
But to original post... when policeman's act debated on here und PH .. general consensus was that 84 mph in this zone even in wee small hours was very OTT - though we could see - to some extent - the situation on empty motorway.
However, we asked lieber IG - cannot recall if he posted his thoughts on the thread in question - he probably did
but his view ist that his patch take dim view of unauthorised "testing"... as any drills they do to hone und tone their skills are thoroughly risk assessed before any highly supervised und managed drill take place.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
Members
