Safe Speed Forums

They won't need constant vigilance, conscious effort nor undue effort to stay within the speed limit in one of these, so it is a good choice for those facing bans. In fact, it would take undue effort to reach half the speed limit. The only thing is, there may not be enough torque to get over the speed bumps!

_________________
I stole this .sig

I haven't conceded anything.
My terms of reference were quite clearly set out earlier on in that thread:



and:



Both those postings were before your post which stated, in reply to the first one:



So who's sprouting crap now?

Try putting your brain in gear before you open your mouth in future.

The guff is that when (or indeed if) it ever becomes reality, then myself & plenty of others like me will make a small fortune very quickly by hooking up a laptop and having a little "chat" with it (just as we did when so called "tamperproof" electronic speedo's became the norm).

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?

We're obviously dealing with someone who's a few sandwiches short of a picknick in the guise of Basingwerk, aren't we?

The man talks about driving around multi story car parks at 60mph, or onto one's drive at a similar speed.

Basingwerk, you claim you want the rest of us to "get with the programme", I would respectfully suggest you get a life and stop trolling: Our amusement at your idiocy in such peurile comments is really quite unfair on you.

I think Paul Smith should introduce a prerequisite requirement that you have to have an iq greater than that of a sloping forheaded nuckle dragging Neaderthol.

Time to wake up now, Basingwerk... Wakey, wakey.

Cheerio then, PaulF.

Have you failed the entrance exam then, friend of Basingwerk?

I have demonstrated twice to you that, in some circumstances, your risk increases more than linearly with speed, so your statement above is wrong. The big man himself concedes that, at very high speeds, risk becomes catastrophically high and asymptotically approaches 100%. Just think about it – the risk of crashing in my village streets reaches infinity (100%) long before you can reach extremely high speeds. Unfortunately, your statement above simply cannot be true!

If you could only learn to use your grey matter, instead of just responding instinctively, you’d realise that. You are in grave danger of becoming joining PaulF in the group of Agnry Mne!

PS. I notice PaulF’s English is getting even worse – “forheaded”, “nuckle”, “neaderthol”! Do you think he’s a foreigner, or just thick?

_________________
I stole this .sig

There's quite enough trouble out there that we must all address without fighting amongst ourselves. So I'm calling a halt and closing this thread.

Ad hominem attacks are banned forthwith. A moderator will decide if a statement was an attack or a joke. Jokes are welcome, especially if they are funny.

People violating the ad hominem ban will receive just one warning. Further attacks will result in the poster being banned.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety