Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Oct 27, 2025 05:40

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 20:48 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Quote:
In all seriousness, go for it.


No, it's pointless.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 20:56 
Offline
Final Warning
Final Warning

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 23:59
Posts: 280
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Quote:
In all seriousness, go for it.


No, it's pointless.


Well perhaps you and others should stop calling people trolls if you aren't willing to justify it.

_________________
Before you moan about middle-lane hoggers, check that you yourself are obeying all the rules of the road.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 21:36 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
hjeg2 wrote:
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Quote:
In all seriousness, go for it.


No, it's pointless.


Well perhaps you and others should stop calling people trolls if you aren't willing to justify it.



Hjeg2.. I wish you would chat about things to do with road safety and not posts which you think are accusing you of whatever.


For record.. I do not see your posts as undermining my opinion. I can counter you. I think Wildy :neko: trounced you a bit with her foreign stats. In fairness.. she explained what it said in fairly lucid terms. She does worry about posts from "foreign" though.. but you must understand that German/French and Italian appear more "normal" to her than English which we native brought up Brits see as our "norm".. if you understand what I am saying.

Basically .. we can trump you out here.. because of the foreign access. Howard and spinnny claim Europe safer than UK.. but a google to their original lingo news/stats disputes this allegation

The only safe roads are their motorways really :popcorn: per their own stat returns. However, they do investigate causes better and seek to educate ALL and are winning their battles very quickly as a result of all this and deseve :claps: and :bow: for this.


I would like you to comment on a story we found via google this evening though.

I think I should post in SPL as opposed to cycling forum since you post here most of the time. Do read it. Do comment.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 01:00 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
hjeg2 wrote:

A detailed report showed that fixed cameras in urban areas cut fatal and serious collisions, after allowing for regression-to-mean and trend, by 17%. As well as that, what I like about speed cameras is that they are completely fair.



OK which report - supply link or reference.

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 01:38 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 22:31
Posts: 407
Location: A Safe Distance From Others
Aquila wrote:
OK, last attempt, then I chuck my laptop out the bleedin' window...

The good folk of Hampton Parva have made cardboard signs and placed them, unlawfully and without planning permission, along their sacred village's main drag and, in doing so are negating any possibility of a speeding prosecution due to their actions. The miserable bloody cops in WA have taken a poorly-statuted law and manipulated it for their own ends, making avoiding prosecution for trumped-up driver offences almost unavoidable. They are mirror-image situations...

GEDDIT?

Image

I hope that this answers your kwestchun...



Image

Top quality!

With regard to casualties reducing at speed camera sites, maybe it's true.

But - nationally - road deaths are plateauing; they are not reducing as they should which suggests to me that the accidents that used to occur at scam sites are now occuring elsewhere. This country is not seeing any benefit from the increasing proliferation of speed cams.

That is all.

Goodnight.

_________________
Simon


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 01:49 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
So then, for all the trolls: which is more dangerous???????????????????? :)


Image

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:57 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 17:46
Posts: 823
Location: Saltburn, N. Yorks
Quote:
A detailed report showed that fixed cameras in urban areas cut fatal and serious collisions, after allowing for regression-to-mean and trend, by 17%.




That's 'cos everyone uses alternative routes! :roll: :roll: :roll:

(:oops1: I fed a troll..... :oops: )


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Oscar wrote:
That's 'cos everyone uses alternative routes! :roll: :roll: :roll:


Hmmm, I think there'll be a percentage of the traffic running down the road in the equations somewhere wouldn't you say?

Oscar wrote:
( I fed a troll..... )


Cor, this is getting v boring.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:16 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
weepej wrote:
Cor, this is getting v boring.

Well, you don't have to either read these forums or post here...

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
PeterE wrote:
weepej wrote:
Cor, this is getting v boring.

Well, you don't have to either read these forums or post here...


You don't find the constant use of the "troll" ad hominem a bit dull (and childish)?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:20 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
prof beard wrote:
hjeg2 wrote:

A detailed report showed that fixed cameras in urban areas cut fatal and serious collisions, after allowing for regression-to-mean and trend, by 17%. As well as that, what I like about speed cameras is that they are completely fair.



OK which report - supply link or reference.



I think he means the Pilkington report which did bandy around claims from 17% to 70% at fixed cam sites.


It also concluded that the study did not prove cam effectiveness because no one could supply a standard method of collating the statistics. I think we have discussed that report on here before... along with the Mountain one which looked at one set of urban roads only. She admitted that her work was not conclusive and subject to further research at the time.


We do have the links and the pieces in full somewhere in archives on threads which Paul initiated for discussion.

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:35 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
The report that Paul obtained through his FOI namely the TRL595 website ref here, clearly shows that there is a marked improvement, with all Police presence on the roads, but all cameras of any kind, have a worse effect !
This includes fixed analogue and SPECS, and it was partly this that I recently discussed on one of the Three Counties Radio, stations.

So if there IS ANY report that can show anything else, then I would LOVE to see it - so weepej do PM me with it or place that ref here or send me a copy of it by email or post even.
I would welcome a debate about this. I will start a new thread however, as this one is far too long and far to varied.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:43 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
The report that Paul obtained through his FOI namely the TRL595 website ref here, clearly shows that there is a marked improvement, with all Police presence on the roads, but all cameras of any kind, have a worse effect !
This includes fixed analogue and SPECS, and it was partly this that I recently discussed on one of the Three Counties Radio, stations.

So if there IS ANY report that can show anything else, then I would LOVE to see it - so weepej do PM me with it or place that ref here or send me a copy of it by email or post even.
I would welcome a debate about this. I will start a new thread however, as this one is far too long and far to varied.


I'm pretty sure hjeg2 wasn't speaking of this report, but I don't know which one hjeg2 is referring to, Pilkington report?

Personally I'd expect that speed cameras at road works would result in more silly shunts and less serious crashes (i.e a postive result as what would be serious crashes at higher speeds are mollified into silly shunts), and that appears to be what the executive summary is saying.

Oh, and it also states that there is no significant difference on PIAs between no works and works which is a very different picture from 10 years ago when it would seem that roadworks meant higher PIAs.

With average speed cameras commonly in use today I bet the PIA rate (certainly the KSI rate) in road works is actually lower that the normal motorway rate.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 18:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Unfortunately 'betting' should have no place in road safety, though it sadly does at present!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.019s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]