SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
The report that Paul obtained through his FOI namely the TRL595 website ref
here, clearly shows that there is a marked improvement, with all Police presence on the roads, but all cameras of any kind, have a worse effect !
This includes fixed analogue and SPECS, and it was partly this that I recently discussed on one of the Three Counties Radio, stations.
So if there IS ANY report that can show anything else, then I would LOVE to see it - so weepej do PM me with it or place that ref here or send me a copy of it by email or post even.
I would welcome a debate about this. I will start a new thread however, as this one is far too long and far to varied.
I'm pretty sure hjeg2 wasn't speaking of this report, but I don't know which one hjeg2 is referring to, Pilkington report?
Personally I'd expect that speed cameras at road works would result in more silly shunts and less serious crashes (i.e a postive result as what would be serious crashes at higher speeds are mollified into silly shunts), and that appears to be what the executive summary is saying.
Oh, and it also states that there is no significant difference on PIAs between no works and works which is a very different picture from 10 years ago when it would seem that roadworks meant higher PIAs.
With average speed cameras commonly in use today I bet the PIA rate (certainly the KSI rate) in road works is actually lower that the normal motorway rate.