Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 10, 2025 02:36

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 455 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 00:12 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:47
Posts: 920
Location: South Bucks
pogo wrote:
I'm in favour of limits, correctly set by the "old method", not subject to PC interference by self-styled "safety experts", policed with integrity and common sense - unlike the the present approach which is equivalent to advocating that the full weight of the "Theft Act" be brought to bear on each and every person who takes a few paperclips home from the office.


It's actually rather more extreme even than that. The theft of a few paperclips is, still, theft; and, however trivial, represents a loss to the victim. A speeding offence - any speeding offence - that does not actually result in a crash or incident of some sort has no consequence - causes no loss or damage - to anybody.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 00:36 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Observer wrote:
pogo wrote:
I'm in favour of limits, correctly set by the "old method", not subject to PC interference by self-styled "safety experts", policed with integrity and common sense - unlike the the present approach which is equivalent to advocating that the full weight of the "Theft Act" be brought to bear on each and every person who takes a few paperclips home from the office.


It's actually rather more extreme even than that. The theft of a few paperclips is, still, theft; and, however trivial, represents a loss to the victim. A speeding offence - any speeding offence - that does not actually result in a crash or incident of some sort has no consequence - causes no loss or damage - to anybody.


Yes - the theft of a few paper clips is theft -however the employee could well claim that he did not claim for the extra 25 mins in the office on the phone.If he did , would his employer consider paying him for it - and if not : could this be considered as theft by the emploiyer?/
Or the employee used his own personal tools to do a job, because the employer had not provided any - and had not paid for the use .

Catch 22---n'est pas.






Again - catch 22

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 01:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
basingwerk wrote:
I don’t duck and dive.


Notwithstanding BW's sin-bin status and the self inflicted removal of his right to reply, IMO this is the biggest falsehood uttered by the man in this forum, and I present this thread as evidence.

The number of times he has sidestepped questions, disregarded points by other posters and gone off on tangents speak for themselves.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 04:21 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
starfin wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
basingwerk wrote:
<THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK>


After this I felt I had no option but to suspend basingwerk's user account.

:o
I consider that too big a price to pay for such a small, somewhat ambiguous remark. Basingwork maybe argumentative and his remarks are often barbed, but I consider him a great asset to this forum. He's good entertainment at any rate. I urge you to consider lifting his suspension at the earliest opportunity.


There's an email exchange going on. I hope the problems can be resolved.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 08:35 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Ooh - had more laughs skimming through this! I'd miss the old :censored: though - need a good laugh after work.

But if he's reading :lol:


basingwerk wrote:
Anyway, my patience with you all is over, and now I’d like an answer instead of all this ducking and diving.


:? :? :banghead:

our basingbonce wrote:
What message do you suggest we give to young drivers, who are more likely to die in a crash than anything else? Should we recommend that they stay within the limit, or should we tell them that staying within the limit is a load of old guff,


How about the threads in "Improve Driving" for starters?

Maximise COAST in all driving lessons?

Direct them to track days as per journalist in a local paper of a town much further south in the "urban sprawl".

Also - new drivers and young males do not always have accidents because of a youthful preoccupation with wheel spins - more to do with error due to inexperience - hence we should stress the CIOAST message, andencourage to improve as contimuum. You keep banging on that speed is something "naughty" and kids will do what kids have always done - try to push the envelope as far as they can. Not that I am expert on kids either - but with seven of the little "horrors" - I try to learn with great sp[eed :lol: :wink:

basingbonce wrote:
and only northern blokes with flat caps in Morris Minors bother with it?


:rotfl:

You've seen nuffink! Lot of young lads were be converted to the Moggie if they saw ours in action! :evil: :twisted:

But I don't wear a flat cap - I need full rally gear - especially if Wildy drives it! :lol:

basinbonce wrote:
With respect to the amount of attention, it is totally impossible to measure attention in percentage points, so SafeSpeed will have to wait until hell freezes over.


Any decent pyschologist could measure this :wink:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 08:46 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
As for the speeding - everyone does so - extra couple of mph but accidents occur a low speeds. Know this from RTAs dealt with when in A&E days and of course Wildy's cousin was hit at just 20 mph and killed on impact.

Most overspeeds result in zero accidents and millions of people are being fined over trivialities :furious: and even receiving the same punsihments as those who really ignore road conditions. :furious: It's just not on :furious:- in interests of equity and justice. Also drink drive accidents are UP, defectives are UP, and some just do not know what "stay on own side of road using dipped lights" means and too few understand what rear fog lights are for. And some of these accidents are due to this - and guess what - these folks are below or at lolly sign. :banghead:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 10:30 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
PeterE wrote:
But you still seem to be claiming a moral right to break the law based on your individual judgment. And, unless it is in your immediate local area, you are unlikely to know the history of speed limits on a particular road, so all you can do is take it as you find it.


Hmmm that's not what I'm trying to say. What I'm saying is that I don't want to drive with my eyes firmly fixed on my speedo - I want to drive safely, taking all circumstances into consideration. If I'm not in my local area, then not being familiar with the location is another just another factor that I need to take into consideration.

PeterE wrote:
The vast majority of drivers set out in the knowledge that at some point on their journey they will exceed a speed limit, perhaps not by much, but they will exceed it all the same. They know that it will be irrelevant in safety terms, and up to about 15 years ago they knew it would expose them to minimal risk of prosecution. If that amounts to intention, then it is intention. But it is very different from deliberately tear-arsing through residential estates at 70 mph.


I agree totally.

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 10:40 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
Although I'm the new boy here and for what it's worth, I'd like to see BW's account re-instated too.

I am keen to hear and try and understand an opposite point of view to my own...

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 10:56 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
BottyBurp wrote:
Although I'm the new boy here and for what it's worth, I'd like to see BW's account re-instated too.


I hope that will be possible.

BottyBurp wrote:
I am keen to hear and try and understand an opposite point of view to my own...


However, you are unlikely to hear a coherent opposite case from basingwerk. I cannot recall that he has ever presented a straight and honest argument. Basingwerk has been described (accurately in my opinion) a 'twisty-turny thing'.

Believe me, if we found someone who could present an honest argument for 'the other side' we would welcome him with open arms. It is perhaps illuminating that we have found no such person in the 21 months that these forums have been operating.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 18:43 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:15
Posts: 318
Location: Co Durham
I think we perhaps need to separate speeding from driving behaviour generally. If you speed whether intentionally or not you know that you may receive a penalty for doing so. This act of speeding may or may not endanger other road users. We know from police accident reports that inappropriate speed for the prevailing conditions is rarely the sole cause of accidents, though it is sometimes a factor.
There has been a lot of discussion on why young drivers have so many accidents compared with other groups of drivers.
Perhaps it is because they don't perceive situations as risky whereas in later life they would. Something to do with feeling that they are immortal, perhaps. I can think of my son in his 20s running along Striding Edge while I am picking my way carefully thinking what might happen if I slip. This means he is much more confident in his ability to recover the situation if it goes wrong than I am or that he will react more quickly. The more you "get away with it" the more your confidence improves. The same applies to driving. The same applies to my daughter - driving too fast and too close but getting away with it. Instead of perceiving a near-miss as a wake-up call, it is laughed off. I like to think that the ratio is 10 near-misses to 1 accident.
One hears of unofficial contests where the aim is to get from A to B in the shortest possible time - I just hope they don't meet the tractor and trailer at the wrong moment.
And then there's motorcycling. On a lot of roads sticking to the speed limit is no fun at all, so outside built-up areas most don't stick to it. The risk thing applies to bikers' manoeuvres perceived as dangerous by car drivers. Often these manoeuvres have little risk attached from the bikers' point of view. Failure to take a bend safely is more likely to be their undoing. In some ways we should be pleased that young drivers tend to have cars these days rather than motorbikes as when I was 17. Running off the road is more dangerous to a motorbike rider and the pillion passenger (if there is one) than to a car driver but the car driver is more likely to kill or injure others.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: New to this forum
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 07:34 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 06:31
Posts: 5
Hello, I am a French guy and I am interested by the high level of analysis displayed by this web site.


I quicky went through this thread, and I think that the posts of basingwerk brought some nice discussion up.

I would be interested to discuss with him.
As a French driver, of course, I may not have the same quality experience as you folks have, but would be happy to contribute my 2 eurocents.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: New to this forum
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 08:35 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
vchiu wrote:
Hello, I am a French guy and I am interested by the high level of analysis displayed by this web site.


I quicky went through this thread, and I think that the posts of basingwerk brought some nice discussion up.

I would be interested to discuss with him.
As a French driver, of course, I may not have the same quality experience as you folks have, but would be happy to contribute my 2 eurocents.


Salut! Je vous fais bon accueil! Enchante de vous avoir chez nous! :lol: :lol: :lol:


:hello:

:welcome: :drink:


I enjoy driving in France - and find drivers fairly polite on whole. Paris - another matter :yikes:


Also found it amusing to read the ministers who introduced :camera: in Frnce got pinged and was even more amused to read initial reactions were "traditionally" French :gatso1: :gatso2: :gatso3: :twisted: :clap:

As for Basingbonce - nowhere near as bad as true "trolls" where the reaction should be:

:trolls:

We'd made some in-roads - he agreed IG needed to eat :lol: and was even using the term Pratnership and scam! - In case vchiu does not realise - slight "play" on words as we generally tend to substitute "prat" for "£silly person" and "£££scam" for so called "safety" camera - to be politically correct here :wink: and thus fashionable in eyes of the average "Guardian reader" :twisted: :hehe:

Like to see him continue his musings on here as he really proves how right we are anyway! :P :P :P

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Enchante egalement
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 09:25 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 06:31
Posts: 5
French drivers are polite??
I really don't think so. I prefer the british drivers. German drivers are OK

Anyway, I think it is healthy to have contradictors, and I would be open to inviting "road safety" activists to get into heat debate.

But it is key not to get personal and stay cool.

I tried to light up some discussion about speed limit upgrading on www.edmunds.com forum, but it seems nobody cares. I am very frustrated by ridiculously low speed limits that I sometime believe they stand for compulsory minimum speed limit indeed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Enchante egalement
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 20:51 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
vchiu wrote:
French drivers are polite??
I really don't think so. I prefer the british drivers. German drivers are OK


Guess it depends where you drive. I find Paris a nightmare :yikes:- but in Haute Savoie, and Alsace-Lorraine - drivers have been fine. Pas de probleme! :lol:

Biarritz was another mattter :yikes: and Provence? Merde alors! :evil: But we've always had fun on the Corniche on Cote d'Az .. BOF! 8-)

My wife'e Swiss but learned to drive in Germany (SHe's from Appenzell so tends to talk that funny nasal twang :? :D :roll: She's quite a good driver :wink:



Quote:
Anyway, I think it is healthy to have contradictors, and I would be open to inviting "road safety" activists to get into heat debate.

But it is key not to get personal and stay cool.


True - and our basingwerk liked the last word. Wife, self and IG (he's my wife's cousin :wink: ) found him amusing overall.

Quote:
I tried to light up some discussion about speed limit upgrading on www.edmunds.com forum, but it seems nobody cares. I am very frustrated by ridiculously low speed limits that I sometime believe they stand for compulsory minimum speed limit indeed


Some limits are ridiculously and others are actuall too high for th road condition. We can all name roads. :roll:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: back to the topic
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 07:31 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 06:31
Posts: 5
Thank you for those touching and profound words,

Now I propose we go back to our topic : WHY DRIVERS SPEED?

My answer is : because posted limits are way too Low.

I have a beloved 1978 Citroen Ami 8 estate, which huge 602cc can propel me to the deadly speed of 70 Mph (but need patience)

I think many posted limits are rather suitable for this car.

I am also the owner of an Ecologically-unconscious BMW 740i that can easily top twice this figure.

as, for one, would never ever think about even breaking our beloved 70Mph limit with the ami8 on the mortorway (even if it was capable to). On the other hand, I would get much more safety going 30 mph more with the latter. (optimal road/weather/traffic/health conditions, this goes without writing)

My view is that different cars should get different speed limit abilities on the motorway. The limit would not exceed, say, 75% of the car's top speed. good for Porsche, bad for an Austin mini


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 18:09 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 17:13
Posts: 11
Why not just admit it,
you all get caught speeding and lose your rags because deep down you know damn well that you weren't paying a blind bit of attention and you feel like a prat.

WHY PEOPLE SPEED

Stupidity
Lack of attention
FUN
Arrogance ( thinking ability to pay equals ability to play )
Bad timing
Frustration
FUN
Selfishness
Drunkeness
FUN
Irresponsibility
Poor time management
FUN

:roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 18:20 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Witchescat wrote:
Why not just admit it,
you all get caught speeding and lose your rags because deep down you know damn well that you weren't paying a blind bit of attention and you feel like a prat.

WHY PEOPLE SPEED

Stupidity
Lack of attention
FUN
Arrogance ( thinking ability to pay equals ability to play )
Bad timing
Frustration
FUN
Selfishness
Drunkeness
FUN
Irresponsibility
Poor time management
FUN

:roll:


You think you have thought this through, but allow me to assure that you have not. Stick around and examine the arguments.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 18:28 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
Hi Witchescat

Welcome aboard! Please have a good look around the SafeSpeed site. Hopefully you'll find it of interest and realise that this site is about Road Safety.

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 18:30 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Witchescat wrote:
Why not just admit it,
you all get caught speeding and lose your rags because deep down you know damn well that you weren't paying a blind bit of attention and you feel like a prat.

I think you'll find that most of the regular posters on this site have clean licences of many years' standing.

Perhaps you'd like to give us a synopsis of your own driving experience and explain how you ensure you never exceed any speed limits.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 18:39 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 17:13
Posts: 11
I have had car and bike licences for exactly twenty years.
I have been fined for speeding 3 times, all fixed penalty VASCAR( last one in 94 ). I'm guessing at around 350,000 miles in cars, vans ect and about 100,000 miles on bikes.
How much longer do you want me to consider my opinions?
I think it is you who have not thought this through or you misunderstand my post.
The question asked by the thread is WHY. I gave a list, what on that list do you not agree with?
You may have others to add but do you absolutely reject any I gave?
Do you speak for all drivers or just yourself in which case do you have special circumstances you would like to explain?
Was it the comment about not paying attention that irked you? Are you seriously suggesting that people are deliberatly driving through speed traps out of bloody mindedness?
I they don't see the camara then how can they claim to be paying attention?
Let me sweeten the pill for you and confirm that ( apart from the drunkeness ) all the traits in the list I posted are ones which I am also guilty of, and so are YOU.

The thread is titled 'Why people speed'.
What are you not getting ? Perhaps I am missing something here.
Is there a hidden question or meaning or does it in fact simply ask the question 'Why people speed'
Why the smarmy replies?
If the post title means something completely differant to you then perhaps 'Welcome to the forum' really means' go to hell!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 455 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.026s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]