I don't particularly agree that one bent sign should get a driver off, as you say if a driver has been adequately informed. As a driver with a short term poor memory, I do expect a reasonable number of repeater signs, visible in daylight night time and dusk.
Certainly on the routes I have highlighted the drives have neither been adequately informed nor legally informed. However it has moved on to a higher level now. I have requested in fairly clear requests to every councillor and the councils fault reporting system and to the Chief executive that I expect the signage to be brought up to the legal standard.
I am receiving ridiculous excuses.
The chief of highways for Southampton has not got a scoobie of how to sign a speed limit! He is incharge of replacing the supporting bearings on our flyovers next month.
I have requested that they implement government policy that the camera partnerships follow government directives to check the signs every 6 months.
I receive ridiculous excuses.
I ask who represents the council on the camera partnership to which they donate over 1/4 of a million pounds to each year.
I receive ridiculous excuses.
I ask the police to investigate how three camera sites in three highways authority areas have signing defects.
They dodge the question
I ask the CPS to look at the convictions, they dodge the issue.
I am starting to ask the questions like: How did Dr Marion Sinclair and Julian Hewett get the jobs? How are they the most qualified to do the jobs? Where is the scrutiny, checks and balances that should be present in local government? Are they value for money? Doing a web search I cant find out what Dr Marion Sinclair dose or has done!
Is it actually possible to remove bad people from these cosy jobs?
_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV
Snap Unhappy“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code