Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 00:54

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:16 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
There have been occasions when the lousy sound quality of my hands-free has demanded FAR more concentration than holding the phone to my ear would have done - but to do so would clearly have been "dangerous".


While I agree with everything you have posted there , Mole, this last bit is especially true. I find trying to have a conversation on a hands free, with crappy sound qaulity, far more distracting than listening to my phone normally. To be honest, if I am on a clear rural road, I will ,sometimes, switch the phone to loudspeaker to have a conversation, rather than try and listen to the tinny hands free , althogh I do try and keep all received calls short and wouldn't dial out whilst driving..

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:43 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Well, I've just been out for a 10 minute walk to the local shops.

So, on my local high street:

One skip lorry driver looking down at his iPhone in his right hand as he used it whilst driving along. When I challenged him he said it was a sat nav, and asked me if it was ok to use a satnav whilst driving, he might've been using it as a sat nav, but it was clearly an iphone. The sad thing was he had a mate with him, and if he was using it as a sat nav his mate could have operated it whilst he concentrated on driving his skip lorry.

One driver of a very large council lorry, his right hand holding his phone to his left ear, presumably so he could make gear changes with his left hand and get it back to the wheel afterwards to correct his course. He put it down as soon as I challenged him, he looked a little shocked though. This was a very large lorry.

A girl driving a car, phone in right hand against right ear; she ignored me when I challenged her. As she drove away, she was still on the phone, and also changing gear, so no hands on the wheel then (it wasn't an automatic).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:54 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
I think it was good and brave of you to confront them weepej :clap: :clap:

I confess I'm not sure I would have had the same temerity; you don't know who you're dealing with and you may not be so lucky next time.

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:25 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Don't tell me all of you haven't noticed (as I have) the increasing incidence of big trucks coming towards you on s/c A roads drifting over the white line towards you at a frightening rate only to be jerked back into line at the last minute by the driver who has a mobile stuck in his ear.

I disagree with most on here. I never do anything while driving except the driving. I use only steering wheel mounted controls for the radio etc. I don't smoke, drink, use the phone or anything else while the car is moving. I also hardly talk to passengers.

We, on here, invest a lot of capital in promoting improved driver training to increase safety. If you were doing the teaching, would you tell a learner that it was OK to do all this stuff while driving? I think you are advocating what is convenient to you rather than what is likely to be safest.

I also think that other road users apart from drivers should concentrate on what they are doing. For example, pedestrians and cyclists shouldn't have iPods in their ears. They should be listening to what is going on.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 16:28 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:

One skip lorry driver looking down at his iPhone in his right hand as he used it whilst driving along. When I challenged him he said it was a sat nav, and asked me if it was ok to use a satnav whilst driving, he might've been using it as a sat nav, but it was clearly an iphone. The sad thing was he had a mate with him, and if he was using it as a sat nav his mate could have operated it whilst he concentrated on driving his skip lorry.

One driver of a very large council lorry, his right hand holding his phone to his left ear, presumably so he could make gear changes with his left hand and get it back to the wheel afterwards to correct his course. He put it down as soon as I challenged him, he looked a little shocked though. This was a very large lorry.


So whilst walking you could :

A) see a driver in a truck higher than you with a iphone in his right hand, that he was looking DOWN at..really? and then managed to stop him?...really?
)b) Managed to stop and challenge a driver of a council lorry (were they even working on a saturday?)...really?

(c) Managed to stop and challenge a girl driver...really?

I sometimes worry about your facts weepej?

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 16:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
graball wrote:
A) see a driver in a truck higher than you with a iphone in his right hand, that he was looking DOWN at..really? and then managed to stop him?...really?
)b) Managed to stop and challenge a driver of a council lorry (were they even working on a saturday?)...really?

(c) Managed to stop and challenge a girl driver...really?

I sometimes worry about your facts weepej?


Ah yes, graball, you caught me out, I made this all up.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 18:45 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
weepej wrote:
graball wrote:
A) see a driver in a truck higher than you with a iphone in his right hand, that he was looking DOWN at..really? and then managed to stop him?...really?
)b) Managed to stop and challenge a driver of a council lorry (were they even working on a saturday?)...really?

(c) Managed to stop and challenge a girl driver...really?

I sometimes worry about your facts weepej?


Ah yes, graball, you caught me out, I made this all up.
Did you? Hmmm... Interesting...

Okay, let’s cut to the chase; there's no way of knowing!

But I have to say I find it surprising you did not come here on this occasion to say that you tried to jump in the road or stand at the side waving your arms at drivers where you felt someone was speeding which, in your book, is surely more of an issue... :roll:

On your alleged walk I'm sure you must have had at least one speeder out to kill someone, or maybe you live in a small town called 'No-one Speeds' near Bullshit Boulevard.

Could it be you are starting to recognise there are factors more dangerous than simply exceeding a dumb posted speed limit?

Interesting :scratchchin: It's a good job I'm sitting down :o

IF you did what you say, I maintain it's laudable and I take my hat off to you. But what's your excuse for not making an effort against the speeders you would inevitabley have encountered which you feel so passionately about?

The truth is you wouldn't have even noticed if someone was driving 5 or 10 mph over if they were doing it somewhere safely.

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 19:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Big Tone wrote:
Did you [make it up]? Hmmm... Interesting...


No Big Tone, I didn't make it up.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 19:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Big Tone wrote:
Could it be you are starting to recognise there are factors more dangerous than simply exceeding a dumb posted speed limit?



I've always recognised there are other ways to be an idiot on the road other than speeding Big Tone, I think it's the denizens of this place that assert it's my only concern as regards road safety.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 21:59 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
graball wrote:
Quote:
There have been occasions when the lousy sound quality of my hands-free has demanded FAR more concentration than holding the phone to my ear would have done - but to do so would clearly have been "dangerous".


While I agree with everything you have posted there , Mole, this last bit is especially true. I find trying to have a conversation on a hands free, with crappy sound qaulity, far more distracting than listening to my phone normally. To be honest, if I am on a clear rural road, I will ,sometimes, switch the phone to loudspeaker to have a conversation, rather than try and listen to the tinny hands free , althogh I do try and keep all received calls short and wouldn't dial out whilst driving..


Yes, it's all to do with the "spirit of the law" and the "letter" of it. Clearly, the intention is to get drivers to refrain from causing danger by driving whilst distracted in some way. That's fine and laudible, and I'd never want to do that myself. HOWEVER, they came upon their first problem when they realised that anyone who uses a 2-way radio in the car would also fall foul of the new law. We now have this rather laughable situation where you can't use a mobile but you can use a CB. (Obviously the latter NOT being dangerous)! :roll: The next problem they come across is that (like speeding) using a mobile isn't always dangerous. In fact, (also like speeding), using a mobile whilst driving covers pretty much the whole spectrum of causing danger - right from none at all, through "some" and right up to "lots". Now they haven't actually tackled the "distraction" problem, (they've just partially tackled the "not having both hands on the wheel" problem - well, unless one of them is holding a microphone rather than a mobile phone, that is)! The result is that we have an imperfect law. It's not completely useless - accidents of this type have, I think, gone down, but it's (like speed limits) rather a blunt instrument. It's the same mentaility that sets different speed limits for identical vans - one of which has been converted into a camper van.

Of course, we did already have perfectly good laws about not paying attention, but these require some skill and judgement to enforce. (oh, and they cost money too)!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 22:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
graball wrote:
I find trying to have a conversation on a hands free, with crappy sound qaulity, far more distracting than listening to my phone normally. To be honest, if I am on a clear rural road, I will ,sometimes, switch the phone to loudspeaker to have a conversation, rather than try and listen to the tinny hands free , althogh I do try and keep all received calls short and wouldn't dial out whilst driving..


Cor, if I was driving behind you I bet I'd know you were being distracted by a phone call, and then fiddling around with your mobile, I see it all the time, a little sharp swerve here, a drift across the line there, and if this sort of thing happens at the wrong time...

Don't you think you've already got enough to do when driving a car without messing around like that?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 23:41 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
Cor, if I was driving behind you I bet I'd know you were being distracted by a phone call, and then fiddling around with your mobile, I see it all the time, a little sharp swerve here, a drift across the line there, and if this sort of thing happens at the wrong time...

Actually pressing the loudspeaker button is quite simple..... however, if that would cause you to swerve around as you suggest , you need more driving practice, weepej.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 23:43 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
At the risk of stating the obvious, Weepej, perhaps you only NOTICE the ones that do the "liitle sharp swerve here and the drift across the dotted line there..."?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 23:44 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:

At the risk of stating the obvious, Weepej, perhaps you only NOTICE the ones that do the "liitle sharp swerve here and the drift across the dotted line there..."?


And maybe they drive like that all the time and don't even have a mobile phone....

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 01:27 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
To be fair there is a clear 'distraction swerve', 'steering jerk' that can sometimes happen, when people are paying less attention to the road ahead, as opposed to the more gentle swerve or steering flick from the tired driver.
You can 'see' when people are otherwise distracted, but the majority of the time it is 'not too great' and for often only momentary. Not that I approve of this, but what is observed in the 'real world', tells us much about people beliefs, psychology and legal respect.
We can use this as a warning to tell us they are a 'hazard' and take all appropriate action/s ...
We could judge them but that is really not a positive action on any level.
Far better to assess their next likely move and be fully prepared and then be pleased with accurate assessment and be prepared to see how we misinterpreted their actions if we were wrong.
Learning from others is more helpful than being critical - surely ?

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 20:00 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 17:12
Posts: 618
Location: Borough of Queens, NYC, NY USA
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
Not that I approve of this, but what is observed in the 'real world', tells us much about people beliefs, psychology and legal respect.
We can use this as a warning to tell us they are a 'hazard' and take all appropriate action/s ...
We could judge them but that is really not a positive action on any level.
Far better to assess their next likely move and be fully prepared and then be pleased with accurate assessment and be prepared to see how we misinterpreted their actions if we were wrong.
Learning from others is more helpful than being critical - surely ?
Some people prefer to be critical - for those people, it is a positive action, otherwise they wouldn't do it so often. Some prefer it so greatly, that they hasten to judge [either situations or other people], completely ignoring whatever they need to ignore so that their 'conclusion' fits their filtered criteria.

Laws - as well as many people, it would seem - assume that 'supertaskers' are accidental anomalies. 'Simpletaskers' can't or won't believe that such a skill can be acquired by training.

They have learned to ignore that which supertaskers have learned to consider. Thus, whenever the 'simpletasker' and the 'supertasker' disagree (regardless of whether the simpletasker is actually correct or not) the 'simpletasker' has come to an immutable conclusion, because the 'other mutable factors' that the 'supertasker' habitually tracks are always irrelevant.

_________________
The Rules for ALL ROAD USERS:
1) No one gets hurt
2) Nothing gets hit, except to protect others; see Rule#1
3) The Laws of Physics are invincible and immutable - so-called 'laws' of men are not
4) You are always immediately and ultimately responsible for your safety first, then proximately responsible for everyone's
Do not let other road users' mistakes become yours, nor yours become others
5) The rest, including laws of the land, is thoughtful observation, prescience, etiquette, decorum, and cooperation


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 20:15 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
It's a bit like the William Tell thing of him (supposedly) shooting arrows off his son's head. THe elf and softy brigade would lock him up now purely because no one else had the ability to copy him.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 20:42 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
graball wrote:
It's a bit like the William Tell thing of him (supposedly) shooting arrows off his son's head. THe elf and softy brigade would lock him up now purely because no one else had the ability to copy him.


And I can drive quite safely after four pints of beer. Are you suggesting that there should be a law to prevent that just because my wife hasn't the ability to do so?

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Driving while _______
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 20:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 17:12
Posts: 618
Location: Borough of Queens, NYC, NY USA
dcbwhaley wrote:
graball wrote:
It's a bit like the William Tell thing of him (supposedly) shooting arrows off his son's head. THe elf and softy brigade would lock him up now purely because no one else had the ability to copy him.
And I can drive quite safely after four pints of beer. Are you suggesting that there should be a law to prevent that just because my wife hasn't the ability to do so?
I'm not interested in learning how to drive drunk, per se.
However, if we could learn what allows you to drive safely after four pints of beer, and teach others to apply it while sober, that'd be real progress.

_________________
The Rules for ALL ROAD USERS:
1) No one gets hurt
2) Nothing gets hit, except to protect others; see Rule#1
3) The Laws of Physics are invincible and immutable - so-called 'laws' of men are not
4) You are always immediately and ultimately responsible for your safety first, then proximately responsible for everyone's
Do not let other road users' mistakes become yours, nor yours become others
5) The rest, including laws of the land, is thoughtful observation, prescience, etiquette, decorum, and cooperation


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 22:21 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
The Rush wrote:
However, if we could learn what allows you to drive safely after four pints of beer, and teach others to apply it while sober, that'd be real progress.


And if we could learn what allows the people on this thread to drive safely whilst talking on a telephone and teach others to apply it whilst not doing so, that'd be real progress. :)

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 98 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.135s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]