Safe Speed Forums

Another, maybe new, argument for speed cameras

"Speed cameras may become more prevalent because enforcing the speed limit reduces fuel use and so cuts greenhouse gas emissions. "

Wow I am amazed at the lengths they go to to keep up the outcry for speed cameras. Unbelievable!!!!!

The full article can be found here

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/6208312.stm


regards

1. My vehicle is more economical when doing 55 - 60 than 30 - 40. Enforcing poinless limits uses MORE fuel not less.
2. Slowing to 25 mph in a 40 limit because the cretin in front does not trust the camera, then accelerating (gently) back up to 40 uses MORE fuel, not less.
3. Cameras do not STOP speeders even when above the limit, they merely send a bill in the post a few days later. If speeding was dangerous, then they are allowing a dangerous act to take place WITHOUT taking any measures to prevent it!

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!

What about all the paper that is used to send out the nip's

Regards

Andrew

_________________
It's a scam........or possibly a scamola


Homer Simpson

I think the slipping of speed enforcement ruined what was otherwise a good report.



Paper is nothing. Guess how the scamers get to work and from camera to camera.

It kina makes me think of bliar flying to his next climate convention.

Regards

Andrew

_________________
It's a scam........or possibly a scamola


Homer Simpson