Well spotted Nos!
Safe Speed issued the following PR at 21:17 yesterday:
PR510: Spin alert! DfT issues another 'distraction' story
news: for immediate release
At Safe Speed we've become used to Department for Transport (DfT) issuing
'distraction' stories to press in order to bury bad news. In this case they
have issued a 'scare story' about driving test fraud from the Driving standards
Agency (DSA) (A DfT Agency). [1] It's obviously intended to distract everyone
from
the failure of speed camera policy as highlighted in Scrap Speed Cameras Week.
These 'distraction stories' have the following characteristics:
- they are timed to coincide with a bad news story
- they have no genuine new content
- there's no reason for the story to be issued on a particular day (for
example, no new figures published, no new research, no key event.)
Paul Smith, founder of SafeSpeed.org.uk, said: "I've said it before and I'll
say it again. DfT would rather save face than save lives. They are refusing to
own up to the complete failure of their road safety policies and are trying to
spin their way out. It's a sure sign that they know the truth. They have no
defence, so they are attempting to distract us instead."
"The Daily Mail exposed the last 'distraction story' only a week ago.[2] DfT
issued some nonsense about the drink drive limit to distract us from our awful
road safety performance in the new European Transport Safety Council (ETSC)
report."
"This time the real story is Safe Speed's 'Scrap Speed Cameras Week'. Speed
camera policy has failed. DfT does not have one shred of worthy evidence that
speed cameras should work or do work to save lives. I can now shoot down every
single claim that they have made in 100 words or so; almost always by reference
to DfT's own data. (And, yes, I'll take that challenge, anytime.)"
"They can run but they can't hide. We must force them to face up to the failure
of their policies. They must take responsibility and they must start working to
put it right. But all I'm expecting is yet more spin."
<ends>
Notes for editors
=================
[1]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6231892.stm
[2]
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... ge_id=1770
Safe Speed PR on the same subject:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SafeSpeedPR/message/365