Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Nov 18, 2025 18:23

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: DVLA vs The Law
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 22:51 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 22:31
Posts: 407
Location: A Safe Distance From Others
The good lady wife got nipped in November 2003 (47 in a 40 FWIW).

Having recently got married, and with starting a wedding car business, her licence had to be re-newed and the insurance company wanted licence details prior to sanctioning her to drive the Rolls and the Daimler.

When filling in the insurance form, she stated that she had no points (thinking that 3 years have expired. therefore no points on licence). However, today she received her new licence...........still with 3 points on it! The DVLA booklet states that SP30 points remain for 4 years.

Now, the magistrate at the time stipulated that the penalty was £60 and 3 points for 3 years. Yet the DVLA now seem to have decided that the points remain for 4 years :?

Can anyone clarify what the situation is? Who is right? DVLA? The courts?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DVLA vs The Law
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 23:42 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
SigmaMotion wrote:
...

Now, the magistrate at the time stipulated that the penalty was £60 and 3 points for 3 years. Yet the DVLA now seem to have decided that the points remain for 4 years :?

Can anyone clarify what the situation is? Who is right? DVLA? The courts?

Both are right!

The points have effect for 3 years, but must remain on your licence for 4.

The reasoning behind this is best illustrated by example:

Say you collect 9 points for various motoring offences. The law says that if you get a further 3 within 3 years you get banned under "totting up". Now lets say that after 2 years and 11 months you get stopped for speeding. If you could get your old points removed as soon as they expired then you'd simply elect not to take a fixed penalty but to go to court instead. This would take 3 to 6 months to happen, so in the meantime you'd be able to get your old points taken off your licence and take an apparently clean one to court. Having to keep them on your licence for four years prevents this.

Meanwhile Insurance companys want to know about any points they can, as this gives them a justification for loading your policy. The only limit here is the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act which states that they can't be held against you after 5 years, hence why Insurance Companies use this definition instead. No doubt they'd go further back were they allowed to...

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DVLA vs The Law
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 23:59 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
JT wrote:
If you could get your old points removed as soon as they expired then you'd simply elect not to take a fixed penalty but to go to court instead.

A side issue: I thought a court hearing is mandatory in the case of a potential disqualification?

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 01:43 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
The points remain on your licence for four years, but the courts cease to pay attention to them after three years.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DVLA vs The Law
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 20:16 
Offline
Magistrate
Magistrate

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 13:58
Posts: 1155
smeggy wrote:
A side issue: I thought a court hearing is mandatory in the case of a potential disqualification?

It used to be. In the past I have issued arrest warrants for drivers who persistently refused to come to court for a disqualification hearing.

These days a court would only do that in really exceptional circumstances.

A driver who is at risk of a disqualification will always be given the chance to attend court. If he decides not to attend he will be informed of the date and time of the hearing and told that if he does drive on or after that date he may be guilty of driving while disqualified.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 20:17 
Offline
Magistrate
Magistrate

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 13:58
Posts: 1155
jomukuk wrote:
The points remain on your licence for four years, but the courts cease to pay attention to them after three years.

For most motoring offences that is right.

For drink driving and some other alcohol related offences it's 11 years on the licence and ignored by courts after 10.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DVLA vs The Law
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 20:21 
Offline
Magistrate
Magistrate

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 13:58
Posts: 1155
SigmaMotion wrote:
When filling in the insurance form, she stated that she had no points (thinking that 3 years have expired. therefore no points on licence).

Insurance companies usually go back 5 years for speeding points. If that is the case with your insurers you need to tell them the whole story ASAP.

They could void the insurance if they find out you haven't told the truth - even accidentally.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 20:58 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
If I remember correctly, SWINTON no longer load for camera related speed offenses - as reported on a thread around here somewhere!

You can test online by applying for a quote, and fill in various penalties and see what difference it makes to the price. Directline gave me a £10 for an SP30 and £15 for a SP60.
I wonder if they load for having the wife and kids sat with you. :oops: :P

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DVLA vs The Law
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 23:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 16:37
Posts: 265
JT wrote:

The points have effect for 3 years, but must remain on your licence for 4.

The reasoning behind this is best illustrated by example:

Say you collect 9 points for various motoring offences. The law says that if you get a further 3 within 3 years you get banned under "totting up". Now lets say that after 2 years and 11 months you get stopped for speeding. If you could get your old points removed as soon as they expired then you'd simply elect not to take a fixed penalty but to go to court instead. This would take 3 to 6 months to happen, so in the meantime you'd be able to get your old points taken off your licence and take an apparently clean one to court. Having to keep them on your licence for four years prevents this.

Meanwhile Insurance companys want to know about any points they can, as this gives them a justification for loading your policy. The only limit here is the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act which states that they can't be held against you after 5 years, hence why Insurance Companies use this definition instead. No doubt they'd go further back were they allowed to...


Not quite.

1) No court in the land is going to go by what is on your licence - they will have a DVLA printout.

2) Speeding points run from date of offence - so delaying the court appearance will not stop a totting up ban.

3) The point remain on the licence for 4 years form date of offence (for speeding). The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act is what stops an insurance company going back more than 5 years


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 23:36 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 16:37
Posts: 265
Ernest Marsh wrote:
You can test online by applying for a quote, and fill in various penalties and see what difference it makes to the price. Directline gave me a £10 for an SP30 and £15 for a SP60.


I'm very surprised that the loading for SP60 is only £15 - since they wouldn't know what it is for. SP60 is an undefined speeding offence


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DVLA vs The Law
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 23:39 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
patdavies wrote:
Not quite.

1) No court in the land is going to go by what is on your licence - they will have a DVLA printout.

The one I was in 10 months ago did! Either way, that is the reason they stay on your licence 12 months longer than they ought to.
Quote:
2) Speeding points run from date of offence - so delaying the court appearance will not stop a totting up ban.

But it would if the court were to go by what was on your licence (see above) AND you were to get your licence "cleaned" between your last offence the court appearance.
Quote:
3) The point remain on the licence for 4 years form date of offence (for speeding). The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act is what stops an insurance company going back more than 5 years

Isn't that what I said???

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: DVLA vs The Law
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 14:21 
Offline
Magistrate
Magistrate

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 13:58
Posts: 1155
patdavies wrote:
No court in the land is going to go by what is on your licence - they will have a DVLA printout.

Courts frequently do just exactly that.
Sometimes the DVLA are slow providing a printout. Sometimes we have someone who needs their case dealt with very quickly eg military personnel about to go overseas for a prolonged period, and there isn't time to get a DVLA printout.
In such cases we look at the licence and get the defendant to confirm on oath that it accurately reflects the number of points he has. A custodial sentence for PCJ awaits anyone who lies. And yes, we do check up.


patdavies wrote:
Speeding points run from date of offence - so delaying the court appearance will not stop a totting up ban.

As you say, speeding points count from date of offence.
Some offences count from date of conviction. eg any offence which results in a disqualification (not a totting ban) for the offence itself. No points would be imposed in those cases but the distinction between date of offence and date of conviction is important for things like driving while disqualified.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 14:41 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
patdavies wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
You can test online by applying for a quote, and fill in various penalties and see what difference it makes to the price. Directline gave me a £10 for an SP30 and £15 for a SP60.


I'm very surprised that the loading for SP60 is only £15 - since they wouldn't know what it is for. SP60 is an undefined speeding offence


They've now done away with SP60 so will not apply in future. I tried getting mine changed, but they wouldn't have it.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.037s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]