Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Jun 06, 2026 02:19

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Cynical Insurance co's
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 18:35 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 15:57
Posts: 1
Location: N London
You may, like me, have gotten an SP30 fine and three points on your lience.
This happened in October thanks to a Gatso in a hidden spot on the A5. For three years, those points were on my licence and could have been used in the 'totting-up' procedure to ban me, if I had been caught for more offences. Then the points show for a further year, presumably to humiliate me in some way, perhaps with car hire companies or more likely insurance companies.
Well after four years the conviction goes away, but guess what. Insurance companies (some anyway) ask you to declare penalties for five years, and likely load your premium for good measure. I am apparantly, a "greater risk because I speed" but only until October this year, when I will no longer be a higher risk.
Any thought on why private companies penalise their customers - in large numbers - for longer than the law / DVLA etc.?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 18:51 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
well, thats set to change:

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14404

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 18:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 15:30
Posts: 643
Quote:
Any thought on why private companies penalise their customers - in large numbers - for longer than the law / DVLA etc.?


Because they can!! Insurance companies are in business to make money and that is one way of extracting more from you.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 21:50 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
semitone wrote:
Because they can!! Insurance companies are in business to make money and that is one way of extracting more from you.

Another way of extracting even more from you (if you can actually get them to offer cover in the first place) is to have a criminal conviction.

It doesn't matter that the conviction has sod all to do with driving or road safety in any way shape or form, tell them you got caught doing whatever and you'll find it very hard to even get insurance.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 23:47 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
Actually it is an offence under the rehabillitation of offenders act to discriminate against someone once the offence is spent. Howeverit is not an offence to ask.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 02:06 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
It's not just speeders that get pinged. It's all males under 25... I'm not sure why there isn't uproar about how sexist it is, but it is discrimination on a huge scale.


Girl, 19, 2 crashes, license for 2 years, Golf 1.4. Cost, approx £800 p/y
Male, 19, 0 Crashes, license for 2 years, Golf 1.4. Cost, approx £1200 p/y

How is that right? How is that allowed?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 08:05 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
anton wrote:
Actually it is an offence under the rehabillitation of offenders act to discriminate against someone once the offence is spent. Howeverit is not an offence to ask.
And of course the offence is spent after 5 years, hence the reason they ask for any convictions within 5 years.

Edit: in my experience (worked in car insurance many moons ago) loadings for points are only for those acquired within 3 years for the majority of companies.

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Rehab
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 14:14 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 14:12
Posts: 4
http://www.lawontheweb.co.uk/rehabact.htm

NB criminal convictions


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rehab
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 15:10 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Dazza wrote:
http://www.lawontheweb.co.uk/rehabact.htm

NB criminal convictions


Eh? Is there any other sort of conviction?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 15:34 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 14:00
Posts: 1271
Location: Near Telford, UK / Barcelona, Spain
mmltonge wrote:
Girl, 19, 2 crashes, license for 2 years, Golf 1.4. Cost, approx £800 p/y
Male, 19, 0 Crashes, license for 2 years, Golf 1.4. Cost, approx £1200 p/y

How is that right? How is that allowed?

Simple. Insurance companies base everything on actuarial tables, ie statistics... Statistically, 19yo males are a much worse risk than 19yo females - hence the higher premium.

_________________
"Politicians are the same the world over... We build bridges where there aren't any rivers." - Nikita Kruschev


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 16:28 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
mmltonge wrote:
Girl, 19, 2 crashes, license for 2 years, Golf 1.4. Cost, approx £800 p/y
Male, 19, 0 Crashes, license for 2 years, Golf 1.4. Cost, approx £1200 p/y

How is that right? How is that allowed?


Unfortunately, you have found out the big truth - that life really isn't fair.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 17:00 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
pogo wrote:
mmltonge wrote:
Girl, 19, 2 crashes, license for 2 years, Golf 1.4. Cost, approx £800 p/y
Male, 19, 0 Crashes, license for 2 years, Golf 1.4. Cost, approx £1200 p/y

How is that right? How is that allowed?

Simple. Insurance companies base everything on actuarial tables, ie statistics... Statistically, 19yo males are a much worse risk than 19yo females - hence the higher premium.

even so, you'd think that someone who's already managed to crash twice would be considered a higher risk than someone who hasn't. That they're charging a known crash risk, as opposed to a theoretical crash risk, 33% less really is a joke.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 17:12 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 14:00
Posts: 1271
Location: Near Telford, UK / Barcelona, Spain
johnsher wrote:
pogo wrote:
mmltonge wrote:
Girl, 19, 2 crashes, license for 2 years, Golf 1.4. Cost, approx £800 p/y
Male, 19, 0 Crashes, license for 2 years, Golf 1.4. Cost, approx £1200 p/y

How is that right? How is that allowed?

Simple. Insurance companies base everything on actuarial tables, ie statistics... Statistically, 19yo males are a much worse risk than 19yo females - hence the higher premium.

even so, you'd think that someone who's already managed to crash twice would be considered a higher risk than someone who hasn't. That they're charging a known crash risk, as opposed to a theoretical crash risk, 33% less really is a joke.

Common sense would suggest that, yes... But I think that they essentially just look at "the big picture".

_________________
"Politicians are the same the world over... We build bridges where there aren't any rivers." - Nikita Kruschev


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 22:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
you say that like the big picture isnt taken using statistics which would very easily be altered to give the desired answer.

The example given, certainly in my experience, doesn't seem to be a rare occurance. I'm very very cautious of the stats which say males = less safe than females, big time.

As for learning life isn't fair. I'm not not the 19 yr old example. I'm 21. Been driving since I was 17, 0 crashes, 0 points. My girlfriend, who has driven for 1 and half years, has 1 crash and is also 21, still brings my insurance down if I add her as named driver to my policy. In my nearly 5 years of driving (come October it'll be 5) I've spent over £5,000 on insurance I've never once used, that was proof life isn't fair, not the bollox way of working out costs.

/rant over.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 00:00 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
mmltonge wrote:
you say that like the big picture isnt taken using statistics which would very easily be altered to give the desired answer.

The example given, certainly in my experience, doesn't seem to be a rare occurance. I'm very very cautious of the stats which say males = less safe than females, big time.

As for learning life isn't fair. I'm not not the 19 yr old example. I'm 21. Been driving since I was 17, 0 crashes, 0 points. My girlfriend, who has driven for 1 and half years, has 1 crash and is also 21, still brings my insurance down if I add her as named driver to my policy. In my nearly 5 years of driving (come October it'll be 5) I've spent over £5,000 on insurance I've never once used, that was proof life isn't fair, not the bollox way of working out costs.

/rant over.


As far as I can tell most of the crash risk associated with young males comes from about 20% of young males. The problem for the insurance companies is that they can't tell which 20% will cause the trouble.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 00:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
Hrm, I suppose it's hard to tell at first. But surely they can tell whose going to be costly or not after 2-3 years of driving. I'm not due half reasonable prices until 25! I can even guarantee them, on account of my for-life liver disease, that they don't need to worry about drink driving/drugs etc... but not one single insurance company I've spoke to takes into consideration personal circumstances. I hate to say it, but it is no wander people go the illegal route


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rehab
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 14:38 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 14:12
Posts: 4
SafeSpeed wrote:
Dazza wrote:
http://www.lawontheweb.co.uk/rehabact.htm

NB criminal convictions


Eh? Is there any other sort of conviction?


Yes. A civil conviction.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rehab
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 15:42 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Dazza wrote:
Yes. A civil conviction.


Can you define the difference?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 16:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
I don't know why the premiums have to be so high anyway; it's not as if the insurance pays out fully.

When my car was written off, by a woman not paying attention, the insurance company offered me around £5000, when the cost of a replacement of the same mileage and specification of the car was around £8000.

Insurance companies are scumbags who rip people off, because people are forced by law to buy insurance, and so the public cannot do anything about it. Switching companies won't work, as they are all much the same. They'll extort money from you, but give you peanuts when you claim.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 21:08 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
sotonsteve wrote:
I don't know why the premiums have to be so high anyway; it's not as if the insurance pays out fully.

When my car was written off, by a woman not paying attention, the insurance company offered me around £5000, when the cost of a replacement of the same mileage and specification of the car was around £8000.

Insurance companies are scumbags who rip people off, because people are forced by law to buy insurance, and so the public cannot do anything about it. Switching companies won't work, as they are all much the same. They'll extort money from you, but give you peanuts when you claim.


I agree.

The history is well known to regulars.

Wildy Cat :neko: ( my very lovely wife) nearly died after someone suffered a fatal. He hit her at an increasing speed. She was stationary in a queue of traffic.

I cannot describe how I felt when a policeman came to tell me .. and driove me at very high speed to her side.

But we had a long fight to get "justice" from this. The guy died before he hit her .. thus his insurance was "void" per his insurers.

We went to court. We won. NHS received their costs of keeping my wife alive.

We banked the rest. I'd be lying if I said "damages" did not help us become "sollvent" at least. We were young .. in serious debt from our student life styles and penchant for fast wheels on a bank loan. :roll:

We'd bought our run down home at auction. Low snip cost. We got family and pals to help bring up to habitable status. As we earned .. we borrowed to improve it. Wildy's accident was major hiccup at first. We spiralled downwards. I had three toddlers. a hefty mortgage.. exams to face. I felt I was paddling a canoe without a paddle at the time to be honest :roll:

Solace of sorts came with the long fought for court decision to state that the guy was insured when he hit her. It made us solvent again.

My posts suggest we afford this and that. I work SODDING HARD for what I have. HONESTLY! and so does my wife.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.141s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]