camerasaremoneyspinners wrote:
Hi guys.
My dad came up with the idea. ...but...don't shoot me.
Basically he's high-ranking and mentioned it to that cock (Richard Brunstrom)....why?
Because all the OAP's were moaning about speeding in the area. Therefore, this is there to give them something constructive to do. The equipment is worth about £100 and wasn't purchased by the police, but by some retard anti-speeding group ( or something or other)
This points aren't enforceable, and nor is the fine. It's like buying your kids a happy meal for instance. - to keep them happy for 5 minutes.
*All view are my own and not my dads btw.
I could be completely wrong here but I think you're on to something and your dad is playing a very clever game. As you say, on one level it's about being seen by the "something must be done" brigade to be "doing something". In reality, it will, I hope, achieve far more.
1. It should show thes busybodies that they are being listened to.
2. It should cost the taxpayer very little and not tie up police resources too much.
3. If the said busybodies actually get out there and are forced to watch all the traffic, I think they'll soon get a sense of proportion and realise that the number of truly "dangerous"drivers out there isn't that great.
4. It will show them that there are plenty of drivers whom they "percieve" to be "safe" (i.e. the ones just like them with the flat caps on and the tartan rugs on the parcel shelf) that tend to exceed the speed limit by the sort of amount that would get you three points.
5. ...and best of all, with the onset of winter, the timing couldn't be better!
It's just the same strategy often adopted by parents of tale-telling children:
"...well that's naughty! - tell you what, you keep an eye on him for the rest of the day and be sure to come and tell me next time you see him doing it..."
- usually lasts about an hour!