Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Nov 14, 2025 13:09

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 13:17 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
and finaly.....
speeding herse driver awarded £30,000
(Claire you could have fun with a press release on this one, LOL)

Quote:
Funeral director unfairly dismissed after sacking for 'speeding' in hearse
A funeral director who was sacked for speeding in a hearse at "more than five miles per hour" has been awarded £30,000.

By Tom Peterkin
Last Updated: 10:27AM BST 02 Sep 2008

Mr Ralston's bosses claim that he drove the hearse faster than five miles per hour Photo: PA
Scott Ralston was compensated after proving that he had been unfairly dismissed from Co-operative Funeral Care in Glasgow.

Mr Ralston took his employers to an industrial tribunal after his dismissal, which resulted from an incident on October 12 2007.

The father-of-two based at Shieldhall, Glasgow, had a particularly busy day and left the Co-operative Funeral Care's garage in a hearse loaded with four sets of remains.

His bosses claimed that he had let the tyres squeal, used the horn and drove faster than five miles per hour. The company accused him of not showing enough respect for the dead.

He was suspended pending an investigation into reckless driving and was then dismissed.

He retaliated by taking his employers to a tribunal. The tribunal sitting in Glasgow found that it was not unusual for the firm's funeral directors to drive faster than five miles per hour.

It also pointed out that the Co-operative Funeral Care garage had signs at the exits and entrances telling drivers to use their horns.

After the hearing, Mr Ralston, who had worked with the Co-operative Funeral Care for 16-years, said he felt "totally vindicated".

I got my hat... coat... Bye...

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 137 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.015s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]