Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Aug 07, 2026 11:17

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 01:32 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Daily Express

Quote:
Police halt father's safe road drive

Friday April 3,2009
By Tom Morgan

A WORRIED father who drove his car behind his son as he walked to school along a dangerous country lane has been warned he could be arrested for obstructing the road.

David Kirkwood dressed Archie, 11, in a high-visibility jacket and crawled along behind him in his red Fiesta topped with a sign explaining that Archie was walking to school.

Mr Kirkwood blames the county council for the fact that the 60mph country lane has no pavements. His traffic-stopping school run was to highlight the dangers of the mile-and-a-half walk to school.

But his protest was cut short when police picked up Archie and drove him to school over “safety fears” and warned his father he could be arrested if he repeated the stunt.

Mr Kirkwood, a self-employed builder from East Hanningfield, near Chelmsford in Essex, said: “I’ve been pursuing this since 2006. Everyone has a right to use the road, cyclists, pedestrians, cars. It’s about equal access to all. Archie wants to walk to school and he should walk to school. I used to walk to school. The county council is paying to transport thousands of children when they could be walking.”

Mr Kirkwood wrote to the police to tell them about his protest and officers stopped him as he was following Archie to his school, East Hanningfield ­Primary.

A spokesman for Essex Police said: “We took the decision to take the boy to school for his own safety.” Officers advised Mr Kirkwood he was “at risk of causing an unlawful or wilful obstruction” if he continued.

A spokesman for Essex County Council said: “Where a parent feels the route is not reasonably safe the county council will carry out an assessment. Where it is deemed there is no safe way, then alternative school transport will be provided. No application for an assessment has been received.”

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 01:44 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Quote:
Everyone has a right to use the road, cyclists, pedestrians, cars.

Does he not mean "cyclists, pedestrians, car drivers"?

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 08:09 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Why didn't his dad don a reflective vest and WALK to school with his son? That way, he could have kept an eye on him AND better taught him what to do and what to keep an eye out for! Also, did his father then drive BACK at walking pace too - in case some other like-minded parent was trying the same stunt (or some other kid was walking to school un-escorted)?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:08 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Mole wrote:
Why didn't his dad don a reflective vest and WALK to school with his son? That way, he could have kept an eye on him AND better taught him what to do and what to keep an eye out for!

Like walking on the correct side of a road that has no pavements?

If the father was following in a car you can bet they were on the same side of the road, which means the boy wasn't facing oncoming traffic :nono:

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:50 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
archiecrombie ?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 15:13 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
I can just imagine all the schoolchildren walking to school next, ALL with parents following in their cars....just imagine it.....;-)

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 19:14 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
graball wrote:
I can just imagine all the schoolchildren walking to school next, ALL with parents following in their cars....just imagine it.....;-)


Children carrying red flags?

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 19:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 20:54
Posts: 225
Location: West Midlands
Steve wrote:
Like walking on the correct side of a road that has no pavements?

If the father was following in a car you can bet they were on the same side of the road, which means the boy wasn't facing oncoming traffic :nono:


Exactly - the picture in the Daily Mail showed the lad walking on the left hand side of the road (thus with his back to the traffic) which isn't exactly what the highway code says that you should do :mad:

mb


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 19:46 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
boomer wrote:
Exactly - the picture in the Daily Mail showed the lad walking on the left hand side of the road (thus with his back to the traffic) which isn't exactly what the highway code says that you should do :mad:

mb

So he did! Let's hope other drivers weren't tempted to overtake before knowing the child was in their path - very safe! :roll:


Moderator message:
this topic has been split into here.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 288 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.059s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]