weepej wrote:
Steve wrote:
Maybe he was a bit fast over the platform, but to lose one's licence for it (disregarding how secure the door wasn't - that alone could possibly be grounds for losing the right to drive trucks) ... are you sure that's a proportionate response?
Yes.
Firstly: thank you for your clear and direct answer.
Secondly:
Losing the ability to drive purely for doing 20mph (and that's generous) over a raised platform? Honestly, I don't think that reflects a sane and/or rational mentality.
weepej wrote:
That truck driver with his close pass
I thought there was plenty of room to pass; don't forget, he was fully in the other carriageway and the cyclists were single file as he passed them - don't forget again: the cyclists weren't hit by the car as it flew sideways behind the truck, so there must have been a lot of room!!!!!
weepej wrote:
and clearly inapproriate speed
20mph? (at best)
weepej wrote:
and acceleration
I didn't think he was accelerating at all; like I said, he wasn't making any ground on that other cyclist...
weepej wrote:
(it's pretty clear to me he was flooring it past the cyclists)
Please explain exactly why you believe it is "pretty clear to [you] he was flooring it past the cyclists".
I'm not letting you off the hook on this one until you give reasonable justification, or a retraction.I predict a bollox response Scrutinising this one claim will flush out any irrational thought processes.
weepej wrote:
should never be allowed near a truck again IMO. He's clearly not mature enough to drive such a vehicle. I'm 50/50 myself on phoning the police to ensure he's been prosecuted, and if he hasn't I'll be making a complaint against him on the grounds that I don't think his driving was acceptable.
I won't stop you. Let us know how you get on. I bet he'll only done for the lack of door security - if that.