Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jun 02, 2026 12:15

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 20:37 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
Wales Online - Here
Darren Devine, Western Mail wrote:
‘Speed track’ camera plea after two killed in a week
Feb 22 2010 by Darren Devine, Western Mail
Fatal crash Deeside

CALLS have been made for additional speed cameras on an accident blackspot which has claimed the lives of two motorists in the space of a week.
A 26-year-old man was killed in the early hours of yesterday morning on Sealand Road, in Deeside, around 500 yards from the scene of an accident that claimed the life of 18-year-old Welsh high jumper Danny Evans last Monday.
The dead man was named last night as Carl Liam Sutton from Connah’s Quay.
Local Flintshire councillor Christine Jones is concerned at incidents of speeding along the A548 road, which for most of its two-mile length between Queensferry and Chester is a 60mph straight single carriageway.
She is demanding additional speed cameras on the road, which she says was icy and covered in mud from nearby farms at the time of the latest accident at 3.45am yesterday morning.
At the moment the road is policed by only one speed camera – at Blacon, in Chester.
In the latest incident a red MG ZR left the road and hit a tree. The driver was killed.

Mrs Jones, 50, said: “They speed along that section, trying to overtake one another.
“They’re young lads in their cars, but not just young lads because I’ve seen all age groups doing it. They shoot along there with no sense of safety and because it’s such a long stretch it’s easy to build up speed.”
Mrs Jones of Garden City, Sealand, said the road could also be better illuminated and is demanding improved lighting.
She added: “It happened near what we used to call Bees Nurseries by Deeside Lane and it’s a notorious spot for accidents.”
Following Mr Evans’ death last week an 18-year-old was arrested and bailed on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving.
Three others were taken to the Countess of Chester Hospital following last week’s accident.
Of these one has since been transferred to Whiston Hospital, on the Wirral, and is said to be in a stable condition, while another man remains at the Countess of Chester.
Businesswoman Christine Price, who works just yards from the scene of the latest tragedy, said many now want to see the speed limit on the road cut from 60mph to 40mph.
She said there’s a gentle bend on one section of the road that some drivers fail to treat as cautiously as they ought to.

Mrs Price, 60, who runs the Elms Hotel, said: “It happened right by our second gate just on the bend and that’s where he seems to have gone off the road. There was also a fatal accident there around four years ago.
“I’ve been talking to the customers today and most of them say the speed limit should be reduced.”
Flintshire County Council’s transport spokesman Tony Sharps said they will wait for the outcome of the accident investigation before deciding whether to take any action.
He said: “We need to know the reasons why the accident has happened and if it is the fault of the road then we’ll do something about it. We have to look into the details of it.”
A spokesperson for North Wales Police said: “The male driver was pronounced dead at the scene.
“The car is thought to have left the road and collided with a tree.”
Mrs Jones will hand in a letter to Flintshire County Council’s highway’s department today calling for more cameras.

Perhaps the Council may listen to the Road Traffic Investigators and understand the true cause of the accident, whatever that is and apply all appropriate engineering and other services or facilities required.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 21:17 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
She is demanding additional speed cameras on the road, which she says was icy and covered in mud from nearby farms at the time of the latest accident at 3.45am yesterday morning.


And a speed camera detecting people exceeding the 60MPH limit would have done what, exactly, to prevent this accident (which may well have still happened at 40MPH), Ms Jones?

These people know absolutely nothing about how accidents happen but have the "one size does all " miracle cure....a speed camera and a limit reduction, which would be far too low for the road , 99% of the time.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 21:28 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
graball wrote:
Quote:
She is demanding additional speed cameras on the road, which she says was icy and covered in mud from nearby farms at the time of the latest accident at 3.45am yesterday morning.


And a speed camera detecting people exceeding the 60MPH would have done what exactly to prevent this accident (which may well have still happened at 40MPH) Ms Jones?

Being fair: there was no mention of any of those drivers exceeding that speed limit.

The photo might give a bit of a clue as to the real cause (and yes, a camera and/or reduction to 40 may well not solve anything)

Image

"Let's reduce the speed limit such that driving at it on ice/snow is safe."

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 21:34 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
Being fair: there was no mention of any of those drivers exceeding that speed limit.


Exactly, at 3AM on an icy, muddy road, I would be taking a chance driving at 40MPH on a bend BUT these women "road experts" probably don't realise, that most accidents on ice happen WELL below the speed limit especially on bends. But telling them that, would be like talking chinese to my dog and expecting him to fetch a ball.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 21:37 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
Perhaps the Council may listen to the Road Traffic Investigators and understand the true cause of the accident, whatever that is and apply all appropriate engineering and other services or facilities required.


I don't think there are "appropriate engineering services available" for idiots going too fast into a corner, on ice....apart from straightening out the corner.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 22:58 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Quote:
She is demanding additional speed cameras on the road, which she says was icy and covered in mud from nearby farms at the time of the latest accident at 3.45am yesterday morning.


Perhaps she might ask for extra road gritting and measures to stop the road being covered in mud -or charge the mud droppers with cleanup costs . :D
In other words make the road surface safer .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 23:24 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
It is utterly tragic to see that through lack of proper guidance of road safety messages, that motorists are failing to observe understand and respond appropriately to conditions that were so obviously in need of much greater care.

It is compounded by the locals believing that they understand about road safety enough to decide that in fact a lower speed will simply stop all road errors - mirroring the propaganda officially dished out. Their mistaken believe that speed is the total measure of safety, and that they are capable of judging the instant solution. Very sad.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 23:51 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Unfortunately though, more and more "road safety" is being put into the hands of amatuers and less notice is being taken of the police.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 00:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 17:12
Posts: 618
Location: Borough of Queens, NYC, NY USA
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
It is utterly tragic to see that through lack of proper guidance of road safety messages, that motorists are failing to observe understand and respond appropriately to conditions that were so obviously in need of much greater care.

It is compounded by the locals believing that they understand about road safety enough to decide that in fact a lower speed will simply stop all road errors - mirroring the propaganda officially dished out. Their mistaken believe that speed is the total measure of safety, and that they are capable of judging the instant solution. Very sad.
I always wonder where the 'the locals' get the impression that they are sufficiently qualified to come to their cockamamie conclusions.

Why do they never say, "I'm not a road & traffic safety expert, but we need one to do an investigation in this area immediately, because I'm sick and tired of living near an accident blackspot."

Instead, they act as if their outrage and indignance is sufficient qualification.

That's not what gets my goat, though ...

If, in response to some horrific local accident, an area resident responded,
"Why hasn't the road layout been altered?"
or
"We need more police patrolling the area"

why do we never hear about these? Are they truly non-occurrences?

Or do they keep asking around until they find someone who asks for a camera, ignoring all other utterances?

Because if it's the latter, then that news medium is complicit in some way with the 'speed kills' agenda.

_________________
The Rules for ALL ROAD USERS:
1) No one gets hurt
2) Nothing gets hit, except to protect others; see Rule#1
3) The Laws of Physics are invincible and immutable - so-called 'laws' of men are not
4) You are always immediately and ultimately responsible for your safety first, then proximately responsible for everyone's
Do not let other road users' mistakes become yours, nor yours become others
5) The rest, including laws of the land, is thoughtful observation, prescience, etiquette, decorum, and cooperation


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 17:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 13:03
Posts: 685
The Rush wrote:
...I always wonder where the 'the locals' get the impression that they are sufficiently qualified to come to their cockamamie conclusions.
...

The next thing you know they will be starting up a website claiming they are road safety experts saying the general public have no idea about road safety!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 17:59 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
GreenShed wrote:
The next thing you know they will be starting up a website claiming they are road safety experts saying the general public have no idea about road safety!

I remember the CSCP having a forum on their website. It turned out that some sections of the general public had more than an idea about road safety - more so than the SCPs themselves; that forum "temporarily" closed and remained that way for a very long time. Is it still temporarily closed?
:D

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 18:02 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
Greenshed, take a look at my name - could give you a clue as to what I do....

I joined the forum after looking at the website and seeing just how much on the website actually conformed to current safety methodology not the pseudo safety that so many 'experts' are spouting regarding road safety and speed limits....

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 18:51 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
It is utterly tragic to see that through lack of proper guidance of road safety messages, that motorists are failing to observe understand and respond appropriately to conditions that were so obviously in need of much greater care.

It is compounded by the locals believing that they understand about road safety enough to decide that in fact a lower speed will simply stop all road errors - mirroring the propaganda officially dished out. Their mistaken believe that speed is the total measure of safety, and that they are capable of judging the instant solution. Very sad.


Yes, the chickens are starting to come home to roost!

We always feared that the government's obsession with automated speed enforcement might lead to a situation where drivers stopped thinking for themselves and assesing the road conditions continuously. I think we're now starting to reap the rewards. We now have an accident in icy / muddy conditions and all they want to do is stick more cameras up or reduce the speed limit. And this in North Walse - the speed limit enforcement capital of the world! :roll:

Steve's right. They won't be happy until every speed limit has been reduced to the level where injury cannot occur in the worst imaginable conditions - that way, nobody has to use their brain to "imagine" the worst possible conditions. Just watch the speedo and you'll be fine....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 19:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 17:12
Posts: 618
Location: Borough of Queens, NYC, NY USA
GreenShed wrote:
The Rush wrote:
I always wonder where the 'the locals' get the impression that they are sufficiently qualified to come to their cockamamie conclusions ...
The next thing you know they will be starting up a website claiming they are road safety experts saying the general public have no idea about road safety!
I am not a road safety expert. I am a very experienced driver who has proven time and again on the road that the first two rules in my sig are incredibly difficult to break for anyone in my zone of influence.
I also don't see where a claim is being made that this forum is populated primarily by road safety experts.
However, IMEO, based on what I've read and observed for the past twenty years, the general public has little idea about road safety, and the government provides less than that.
Does the phrase 'lawnchair quarterback' mean anything?

_________________
The Rules for ALL ROAD USERS:
1) No one gets hurt
2) Nothing gets hit, except to protect others; see Rule#1
3) The Laws of Physics are invincible and immutable - so-called 'laws' of men are not
4) You are always immediately and ultimately responsible for your safety first, then proximately responsible for everyone's
Do not let other road users' mistakes become yours, nor yours become others
5) The rest, including laws of the land, is thoughtful observation, prescience, etiquette, decorum, and cooperation


Last edited by The Rush on Wed Feb 24, 2010 23:19, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 19:33 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
I wonder what will happen if (and they probably will), the local "road safety experts", get their 40MPH limit and camera, then next time we get another "winter spell", some other poor person ploughs into a tree or brick wall on black ice.....


MORE cameras...MORE reductions.....MORE INSANITY!

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 02:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 19:11
Posts: 172
Location: Southampton
The next move will then be down to 20mph. After that? A man walking with a red flag in front of vehicles. We are nearly back to where we were a century ago.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 04:00 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
GreenShed wrote:
The Rush wrote:
...I always wonder where the 'the locals' get the impression that they are sufficiently qualified to come to their cockamamie conclusions....
The next thing you know they will be starting up a website claiming they are road safety experts saying the general public have no idea about road safety!
Or they could come to Safe Speed and read all of our information supplied by the DfT and TRL and so on and come to their own conclusion, or read about what we think in the Press or hear us on the Radio or see us on TV .... at least we are open and show what we think and are happy to debate openly and with no disguise. ;)
Alternatively and heaven forbid the Government leaves road safety in the hands of the Camera Partnerships and not to proper intelligent road safety experts and scientists, as well as driving experts. It could get worse too, as those Camera Partnerships purely apply just one solution namely speed cameras and promote and add to the propaganda that road safety will be all resolved if only people stuck to the posted limit !
This if course misses the point by a long long way as people need to be responsible for their actions wherever they travel on the route and the powers that be must ensure that all is done to apply appropriate education, guidance, engineering and of course appropriate and proportionate enforcement.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 08:30 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Safety Engineer wrote:
Greenshed, take a look at my name - could give you a clue as to what I do..


I could register as "Brain Surgeon" but you wouldn't want me open up your skull :D That is the problem with forums such as this -t you cannot totally trust anything that is said by an anonymous poster.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 09:44 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
The next thing you know they will be starting up a website claiming they are road safety experts saying the general public have no idea about road safety!


OR they could forever go on blindly believing what the Government and CSPs want us to believe, that the ONLY way to drive safely, is to keep below artificially low limits and everything will be totally safe and that drivers don't need to experience higher speeds in order to improve their handling skills. (until the unexpected happens, that is, and then we have carnage)

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 13:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
Looking at the photo and reading the story, why aren't they calling for armco barriers to be installed thus preventing cars from hitting the trees?

Why is dying at 40mph preferable to dying at 60? I never understand the short sighted knee-jerk brigade after a fatal accident.

This smacks of a situation that arose in a company I once worked for. I'm sure you all remember the London Underground train that derailed due to its' engine falling off. The engineers went away and designed a cage to catch the engine when it fell off, my suggestion that perhaps they should address the engine mountings so that the engine didn't fall off in the first place was viewed with derision!

I see this exact attitude from our local councils with regard to road safety!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.036s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]