Steve wrote:
article wrote:
"It is not controllable. It must have taken 500m to stop," he said.
Evidently he controlled it!
Stopping distance:
- assuming typical non-stimulating conditions and car with drum brakes (0.67s, 0.67G) = 547m
- assuming atypical stimulating conditions and decent car such as an AMG (0.5s, 1.0G) = 370m
So where did the "must have" come from?
(I don't know enough to comment on whether the driving was or wasn't dangerous in this case)
Given the car has the latest carbon ceramic braking technology and the marketing blurb makes a point of the extremely short stopping distances then perhaps even 370m is an overestimate. I can think of at least one stretch of road where even a 500m stopping distance would not be an issue at times.
I like this bit
Quote:
Under Swiss law, the level of fine is determined by the wealth of the driver and the speed recorded.
Just get a vagrant to max your car out for you.
