Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Jul 15, 2026 09:29

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 08:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Quote:
A Swedish driver who was caught driving at 290km/h (180mph) in Switzerland could be given a world-record speeding fine of SFr1,080m ($1m; £656,000), prosecutors say.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-10960230

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 08:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 16:10
Posts: 43
I don't know anything about Sweden's roads, or if it was a camera, but this is almost certainly a fair cop.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-10960230

Although the local police are clearly on message "It's not controllable" - a clear falsehood as in the right conditions (racetrack) people regularly control it.


Moderator message: post of same topic merged into this thread.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:00 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
article wrote:
"It is not controllable. It must have taken 500m to stop," he said.

Evidently he controlled it!

Stopping distance:
- assuming typical non-stimulating conditions and car with drum brakes (0.67s, 0.67G) = 547m
- assuming atypical stimulating conditions and decent car such as an AMG (0.5s, 1.0G) = 370m

So where did the "must have" come from?

(I don't know enough to comment on whether the driving was or wasn't dangerous in this case)

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 14:32 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
Steve wrote:
article wrote:
"It is not controllable. It must have taken 500m to stop," he said.

Evidently he controlled it!

Stopping distance:
- assuming typical non-stimulating conditions and car with drum brakes (0.67s, 0.67G) = 547m
- assuming atypical stimulating conditions and decent car such as an AMG (0.5s, 1.0G) = 370m

So where did the "must have" come from?

(I don't know enough to comment on whether the driving was or wasn't dangerous in this case)


Given the car has the latest carbon ceramic braking technology and the marketing blurb makes a point of the extremely short stopping distances then perhaps even 370m is an overestimate. I can think of at least one stretch of road where even a 500m stopping distance would not be an issue at times.

I like this bit

Quote:
Under Swiss law, the level of fine is determined by the wealth of the driver and the speed recorded.


Just get a vagrant to max your car out for you. ;)

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 15:11 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
If he refused to pay and said he would go to jail, would he get 1000 years inside?

IMO, totally daft.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 16:43 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Differential fines based on income tend to allow scrotes to get away with paying nothing, or next to nothing.

This was tried in this country in the early 90s, and produced such wildly disproportionate results that it was soon dropped.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 107 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.019s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]