Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jun 16, 2026 02:47

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 17:13 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 21:51
Posts: 38
Recently I was travelling with a friend and I noticed a "new" behaviour at camera sites - my friend looked in his mirror three times as we passed a Gatso. I asked him what he was doing. He said that because of all the publicity recently around the accuracy of the Gatso cameras, he was checking his speed and then his mirror to see if the camera had flashed him, I presume so he could challenge it in court.

So now we have drivers looking at their speedometer and mirror, when they should be looking ahead!

I hadn't realised how much the cameras alter driver behaviour!

I think it was Sir Issac Newton who said that you can't observe a system without interfering with it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 23:11 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 22:02
Posts: 91
at least if you ram something you can argue you were under the speed limit


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2005 04:25 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
chrisdhall wrote:
I think it was Sir Issac Newton who said that you can't observe a system without interfering with it.


That's quantum physics isn't it?

Though you're absolutely right. And they publish stats to show that speed has been reduced at these sites. How do they measure these speeds? Either surveyors with a speed measuring device, or with those two strips across the road.

In both cases, everyone knows they're speed measuring devices and slow down for them, in the first case this is especially true.

I think there should be some campaign to accelerate over those rubber measuring strips just to screw with the statistics, or would that just justify more cameras (in which case, we should all crawl over them to screw with the statistics, with the aim of making it fall befow the rule)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2005 10:24 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 14:35
Posts: 58
Lum wrote:
(in which case, we should all crawl over them to screw with the statistics, with the aim of making it fall befow the rule)



Or reverse over them and register negative speeds.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2005 12:47 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
That would only work if they were measuring a dual carriageway, otherwise it would just assume the car was going the other way.

I guess you could roll back and forth over it if you were in a traffic jam, make it think there was a unicycle convention going on or something.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.025s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]