Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jan 25, 2026 17:41

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 13:27 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
Pocket GPS World Here
Robert of Pocket GPS World wrote:
Cumbria Bucks Speed Camera Trend
Article by: robert - Date: 19 Sep 2010
http://www.pocketgpsworld.com
Many councils have been in the news lately following decisions to cut back on their speed camera programmes. Following the Government's road safety budget cuts many are saying that they simply cannot afford to keep the cameras running.
According to Cumbria's News and Star their council is doing the opposite.
The Cumbria Road Safety Partnership not only believes that their cameras will survive, but they are going ahead with the installation of two new cameras in December.

They bought the cameras out of last year’s budget, but had to keep them under wraps until they were sure that they could afford the running costs.
As part of the coalition's nationwide £38 million cuts, Cumbria lost £255,000 funding - £213,000 of which was originally budgeted for speed cameras.
Nice to know that they can afford cameras. I wonder how many roads require repair or need proper sound engineering solutions that will make the camera obsolete?

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 19:59 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-11357817

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 20:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
camera operator wrote:


See -camera news - viewtopic.php?f=14&t=23434

Quote:
A spokeswoman for the partnership said road's collision history indicated there was a significant road safety issue.


Seem to remember people jumping off bridges on M4 being classed as a "significant safety issue " ,too, so Vans were sited on bridges on the M4 -but all that would have done would have been to record images of the event -not stop it -and AFAIK that's what safety ( be it road or sea or air ) is about -STOPPING ACCIDENTS .Not sitting in a van taking pretty pictures .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 20:41 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
The last few A41 accidents have been, an old guy having an heart attack and plowing into a lorry, killing his passenger wife and a guy crossing the road from his stopped caravan in the early hours of the morning, being hit by a passing motorist...speed cameras would have saved these people no doubt!

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 21:02 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
graball wrote:
The last few A41 accidents have been, an old guy having an heart attack and plowing into a lorry, killing his passenger wife and a guy crossing the road from his stopped caravan in the early hours of the morning, being hit by a passing motorist...speed cameras would have saved these people no doubt!


Hence my mention of the M4 similarity - looks like more panic measures by SCP trying not to submerge to the depths.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 22:06 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
botach wrote:
graball wrote:
The last few A41 accidents have been, an old guy having an heart attack and plowing into a lorry, killing his passenger wife and a guy crossing the road from his stopped caravan in the early hours of the morning, being hit by a passing motorist...speed cameras would have saved these people no doubt!


Hence my mention of the M4 similarity - looks like more panic measures by SCP trying not to submerge to the depths.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-11363713

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 22:13 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
Nice to know that they can afford cameras. I wonder how many roads require repair or need proper sound engineering solutions that will make the camera obsolete?


Plenty! Someone close to me hit a pothole hard enough to BREAK a wheel. She now drives a 4x4...

Still, I'm sure we can look forward to Cumbria's roads getting safer while everywhere that cuts its camera numbers will see a proprtional increase in KSIs!

...NOT!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 08:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 08:57
Posts: 90
Location: South East England
camera operator wrote:


and also:

camera operator wrote:


Not wishing to appear rude - I'm not sure that those links alone contribute much to the discussion. Even the details are fairly sparse in one of them!

Don't you have some enlightening theory or background info to add value to them?

Please don't take this as a dig at you, I'm just not sure what the message is supposed to be!

_________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 124 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.020s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]