Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 13:42

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 03:05 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
Swindon Advertiser Here
Emma Dunn wrote:
Courses end for speeding drivers
9:40pm Monday 18th October 2010 By Emma Dunn

DRIVERS caught speeding in the town will no longer be given the option of taking a speed awareness course instead of points and a fine.
Swindon police have scrapped the initiative which saw many motorists who had been caught driving over the speed limit take a three-hour lesson about the dangers of speeding.
The initiative has also been cancelled across the county as part of the closure of the Wiltshire and Swindon Safety Camera Partnership, which also saw speed cameras turned off.
A spokesman for Wiltshire Police said: “Speed enforcement will continue in Wiltshire. The roads policing officers and community speed watch will reinforce that. Although the speed awareness courses have been stopped, speed awareness will continue across the county.”
Robert Palmer, an instructor at the Swindon-based Signal Driving School, is a tutor on the speed awareness course. He believes the end of the scheme will be a loss to drivers.
“I think it’s bad news. Education has stopped people speeding and without it they are unaware of the extra risks that they are taking,” he said.
“We have found pretty much everyone goes away having learnt something. It’s a big benefit.
“It’s definitely missing from most people’s experience. They don’t get updated with road situations and other risks. They are not aware of what risks they are taking.
“I wish they were continuing the courses but they are not going to be in Wiltshire.”

Robert and 15 other tutors have run the courses in Wiltshire for four and a half years, and have taught about 65,000 people across the county. “It’s done some good there, it’s a significant number of people,” he said.
Robert said that he has noticed a change in people’s driving habits since the cameras were switched off in Swindon last year.
“I have already noticed that drivers are driving a bit quicker,” he said. “Being a bit of an anorak I notice these things.”

Alan Bishop, a driving instructor at the Driving Academy, said: “Extra training will never go amiss, it’s definitely needed and it’s a shame they are being stopped.”
But Brenda Withers, an instructor for B and S Driving School said she did not think the lessons had an effect. “Drivers might pay attention to the courses while they are there but it’s soon forgotten once they are out,” she said. “The courses didn’t make much difference,”
Should never have to pay for Government provided training - if one can call it that. Let's say that it is worth learning then why be only one of a few selected people that receive this 'training'? - surely this ought to be for all ?

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 07:23 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
Let's say that it is worth learning then why be only one of a few selected people that receive this 'training'? - surely this ought to be for all ?


No. You only offer training to people who need it, who are not already conversant with the subject. It would, for example, be futile, to offer a course in cosmology to Stephen Hawkings. But whether the SA courses were offered to the correct people is a another question.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 07:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
dcbwhaley wrote:
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
Let's say that it is worth learning then why be only one of a few selected people that receive this 'training'? - surely this ought to be for all ?


No. You only offer training to people who need it, who are not already conversant with the subject. It would, for example, be futile, to offer a course in cosmology to Stephen Hawkings. But whether the SA courses were offered to the correct people is a another question.

A very good question it is too. I would suggest that the very nature of the selection process, that all those offered SA courses were the wrong candidates. Those only a few mph over the limit are likely to have drifted, and weren't intending to speed, whereas those most in need of some form of awarness (deliberatley going way over the limit) don't get offered the course.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 08:06 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
The somewhat self interested Robert Palmer wrote:
Robert said that he has noticed a change in people’s driving habits since the cameras were switched off in Swindon last year. “I have already noticed that drivers are driving a bit quicker,” he said.

Yes, they are just returning to the optimum and safest 85th percentile speed after being artificially restricted. My reaction is "So what if they are driving a bit faster. Is it any more dangerous?"

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:26 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
malcolmw wrote:
Yes, they are just returning to the optimum and safest 85th percentile speed after being artificially restricted. My reaction is "So what if they are driving a bit faster. Is it any more dangerous?"


You should also consider the effect of the increased speed on the convenience of pedestrians.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 11:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
dcbwhaley wrote:
malcolmw wrote:
Yes, they are just returning to the optimum and safest 85th percentile speed after being artificially restricted. My reaction is "So what if they are driving a bit faster. Is it any more dangerous?"


You should also consider the effect of the increased speed on the convenience of pedestrians.

Could you expand on this a little?
In my personal experience, I have noticed on the roads I travel where the speed has been reduced to ridiculously slow speeds for the road, that there is now almost no breaks in the traffic, and the cars are travelling much closer together. Making this much more inconvenient for pedestrians than before the limit was reduced.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 11:29 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Yes Odin, exactly correct.

Regarding considering the effect on pedestrians, the Swindon cameras were generally in use on wide straight "link" roads with little pedestrian traffic but artificially limited to inappropriately low speeds. You didn't think that they were positioned on narrow streets outside schools did you?

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 15:48 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Odin wrote:
Quote:
You should also consider the effect of the increased speed on the convenience of pedestrians.

Could you expand on this a little?
In my personal experience, I have noticed on the roads I travel where the speed has been reduced to ridiculously slow speeds for the road, that there is now almost no breaks in the traffic, and the cars are travelling much closer together. Making this much more inconvenient for pedestrians than before the limit was reduced.


That is quite true and if increased speeds do not make life harder for the pedestrian than we have a win-win situation. But - and Motorways are a classic example - it is possible to have a very safe high speed road which virtually excludes pedestrian traffic. But, to be fair, it is usually volume of traffic rather than speed which is the big problem.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 19:06 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
At least they're being honest about the fact that the end of these courses goes hand-in-hand with the end of the SCP, i.e. it was an SCP revenue stream once they got ticket revenue taken away from them.

:scratchchin:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 19:22 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Presumably courses were only offered for drivers a couple of mph over the threshold, and if enforcement is now entirely being done by actual police I would expect them to ignore offenders in that category.

Not that that means that offenders higher up the scale shouldn't be offered a course too.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 22:31 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Or, I guess, it might be better to say that they would NORMALLY ignore people a few MPH over the threshold - but, if their actions were causing a danger, they could prosecute. That's something cameras never quite mastered - discretion!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 01:04 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 19:11
Posts: 172
Location: Southampton
Mole wrote:
Or, I guess, it might be better to say that they would NORMALLY ignore people a few MPH over the threshold - but, if their actions were causing a danger, they could prosecute. That's something cameras never quite mastered - discretion!


That being the important thing, not causing danger. Speed is a relative thing and what is safe is based on actual conditions and not to some arbitary limit diplayed on a post .


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 22, 2010 22:42 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Johnnytheboy wrote:
At least they're being honest about the fact that the end of these courses goes hand-in-hand with the end of the SCP, i.e. it was an SCP revenue stream once they got ticket revenue taken away from them.

:scratchchin:


Think you'll find that this idea ( of courses ) ,was an idea dreamt up when the SCP found funds from speeding was drying up - Police/SCP got so much - and of course the "course organisers " got a lot more . but-it was always income for SCP . plenty on Net about it .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.051s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]