dcbwhaley wrote:
...It was made clear from the start that there was to be no discussion of the merits or otherwise of cameras. Nor was there to be discussion of the correctness of speed limits. It was to be given that the people who set the speed limits are infinetly more wise than the drivers who fail to obey them...
I'll bet!

And that, of course, is the root of the problem. It's a bit like dodgy companies that make their customer complaints departments deliberately inacessible. Those companies that DO have accessible complaints departments are probably the ones that aren't going to get the complaints in the first place AND can maybe have a better go at justifying their actions / decisions when they do!
dcbwhaley wrote:
They did, however, seriously believe that lower speeds mitigate the consequences of accidents. They accepted that some accidents, mainly those involving errant pedestrian behaviour, were inevitable and that, if every drove below the speed limit - especially 20 and 30 limits - the KSI figures would be substantially reduced.
Again, by this time I think I'd really have been seriously thinking about walking out and taking the penalty points! Presumably if we all had to push our cars around at walking pace there would be even fewer KSIs too?
dcbwhaley wrote:
They went into great detail about how to remain aware of the speed limit - expect a change at a junction, be aware of buildings ahead, notice limit signs on side roads and so on. They then went on to investigate the factors that cause people to exceed the speed limit, from being late to being tailgated, and discussed how to avoid them.
OK, my blood would have been pretty near boiling by then. What were the answers by the way, were they the usual patronising "leave earlier" and "pull over and let them past" by any chance?
dcbwhaley wrote:
That led into COAST which was explained and discussed in some detail, with great emphasise that the overriding factor in road safety is driver attitude.
As you say, something good might have come of it! It grates somewhat that we're now getting charged money & time to be told something that we always held dear anyway and we're only there as a result of a process that fails to take it into account though!