Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jun 09, 2026 16:44

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 00:40 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
Wigan Today here
Wigam Today wrote:
Motorists cough up more than £86,000 in fines
Published on Thursday 12 May 2011 11:31

SPEED cameras in Wigan have brought in more than £85,000 in fines from motorists breaking the law last year, according to new figures.
The figures were released through a Freedom of Information request from the Evening Post to Greater Manchester Police.
Greater Manchester Police has 25 fixed safety camera sites across Wigan borough. Having received £86,580 in fines in 2009/10, this works out at £3,463 per camera.

In August last year it was reported that many of the cameras could be turned off across Greater Manchester to save money.

Drivesafe, which is responsible for the cameras, alongside 10 partners including Greater Manchester Police and Her Majesty’s Courts Service say the cameras save lives.
Karen Delaney, Communications Officer for Drivesafe, says: “As a Partnership we have received strong public support for the safety camera operation in Greater Manchester.
“Research conducted highlighted that 63 per cent of Greater Manchester’s motorists think that fewer collisions are likely to happen on roads with safety cameras installed and 73 per cent believe their primary aim is to save lives.
“The Safety Camera Operation has a major impact on the reduction of KSI (killed or seriously injured) accidents in Greater Manchester. Safety camera sites have also had an impact on all accidents.
“The annual average KSI accidents at new camera sites have reduced by more than 48 per cent for the three-year period January 2007-December 2009 compared to the three years prior to the formation of the Casualty Reduction Partnership.”

When asked what the money recouped from fines will be spent on, Drivesafe confirmed it is collected by HM courts and then goes back to the Treasury.
However, they were unable to say how many cameras were working at any one time or why sites are picked.

For more information visit www.drivesafe.org.uk

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 14:00 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Drivesafe wrote:
“Research conducted highlighted that 63 per cent of Greater Manchester’s motorists think that fewer collisions are likely to happen on roads with safety cameras installed and 73 per cent believe their primary aim is to save lives.


Hmmm. So more people believe that their aim is to save lives than believe that they're actually going to!

I think they should stop SCP staff responding to these surveys...!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 15:41 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Mole wrote:
Drivesafe wrote:
“Research conducted highlighted that 63 per cent of Greater Manchester’s motorists think that fewer collisions are likely to happen on roads with safety cameras installed and 73 per cent believe their primary aim is to save lives.


Hmmm. So more people believe that their aim is to save lives than believe that they're actually going to!

I think they should stop SCP staff responding to these surveys...!

It seems the (at least) other 37% don't know about RTTM. Cameras are placed where the local KSI rate is expected to reduce, even if absolutely no treatment is applied in that area.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 18:17 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
Mole wrote:

I think they should stop SCP staff responding to these surveys...!


you should know every SCP is allowed 2 days a week to visit cyber cafes to vote on polls :headbash: , i dont know if you remember pauls ban the gatso poll a few years back, links were passed via users on numerous motoring forums

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 21:51 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Sigh... :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.021s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]