Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jan 25, 2026 10:32

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 10:23 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:39
Posts: 384
Location: Strathclyde / West Highlands / Lanzarote
Just saw this on the news :(
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wSRHAPQR7M

_________________
You only need two tools - WD40 and duct tape. If it doesn't move and it should, use WD40. If it moves and it shouldn't, use duct tape. :0)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 10:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
I have to admit that I activly avoid motorways in poor weather. :( "Sat Nav" makes this much easier to do than in the past....

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 13:51 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
There seem to be conflicting reports as to whether it was foggy or not at the time.

My experience riding home last night was that the fog did not seem very deep - so it was patchy according to the topography!
Also, it was thick near Staveley and Ings, but nearly absent in Windermere.
Had somebody approached Bannerigg from Windermere, they might have said "no fog", while drivers approaching from Ings would have declared the fog to be quite thick.

In either case, drivers should have been better prepared than many seemed to be - some had simply put their fog lights on and were driving to the limit in spite of the clear possibility that they could encounter something they would not see in time!

I rather suspect that whether it was actually foggy at the scene or not, some drivers will have been travelling too fast for the conditions - confident perhaps that they were not breaking the speed limit!

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 14:36 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Yep, when the authorities have to choice of promoting diving at a "safespeed" or the "speed limit", which do they believe is best for the majority? Answers on the back of a stamp please!!

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 15:24 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Thoughts go to all involved & families etc that have lost someone last night on the m5.

Lots of idle speculation of course, whatever the trigger i struggle to understand how 25+ vehicles can get it so wrong.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 15:58 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
ed_m wrote:
Thoughts go to all involved & families etc that have lost someone last night on the m5.

Lots of idle speculation of course, whatever the trigger i struggle to understand how 25+ vehicles can get it so wrong.


Thoughts go back to about 18 years ago -two similar ( about same time ) , M6 Corley area ( surface that badly burned that road was shut for a few days) .Other M42 bottom end --massive pile up in fog and lots of points earned .I got stuck in a tail back after another on M69 on same day -fog was dense ,but drivable, if sensile . I had to stop an ask one following car to loose headlights or give me some space - in the fog the dipped beams spread wie & blinded me

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 18:21 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
ed_m wrote:
whatever the trigger i struggle to understand how 25+ vehicles can get it so wrong.

I was on the A1 leaving Newcastle a few weeks ago, and there was torrential rain, with lots of standing water and spray.

I and many other drivers slowed to between 45 and 50 mph, and switched on dipped lights and rear fogs - but for mile after mile we were passed by drivers at the 70 limit, and many of those without lights - you were only aware of their presence while they were along side you!

WHAT could they not realise that the rest of us could? :o :(

It always worries me that when fog is patchy, drivers speed up in the clear patches - only to race into the foggy bits before slowing - if they slow at all.

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 21:32 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
From everything that I have observed today it looks like that at that moment the fireworks was over by some 10 minutes and that there was no fog at that time.
A report - Sky News from a person involved in the incident states "
Sky News - Ciara Neno wrote:
"There was a very thick fog bank which lifted as quickly as it came," Ciara Neno told Sky News.
"I cannot stress how blessed we feel to be able to walk away from this, too many others were not so lucky."
Ciara Neno, eyewitness
"There were no fireworks at the time - just music from the rugby club.

"It was horrifying to hear that speculation was rife that the fog only came after the accident and that driver distraction caused it.
"As we were near the very start of the crash I can categorically state that this was not the case."

Mrs Neno was driving with her husband when the crash occurred in front of them.
"It was quite frankly the scariest night of my life and we are extremely lucky to be alive.
"A black fog came down very very fast and the Iceland truck in front of us literally disappeared.
"We managed to break and not hit the truck but the carnage had started and all we heard was 'thump thump thump' and we were waiting to be hit and end up under the lorry.

The crash was described by police as one of the worst ever seen
"I got onto the emergency services and my husband started dragging people from smoking cars.
"The noise and the smell was horrendous and there was several explosions as the fires took hold.
"I cannot stress how blessed we feel to be able to walk away from this, too many others were not so lucky."

Mr Evans was on the opposite side of the dual carriageway. He said he saw paramedics and police run over the central reservation in an attempt to reach the injured as quickly as possible.
"There were some fire guys on a ladder going up into a squashed carriage of an artic and they were obviously trying to see if the guy in there was alive.
"There was loads going on. It was a mess. Driving past you just felt like these guys are putting their lives on the line climbing into the cabins of mashed up lorry cabins to try and get people out."
I can only assume at thsi point that the black smoke was from a damaged vehicle or from tyres from the jack knifed lorry / lorries.
Someone said that it was near to the junction slip road but not near enough from what I have seen to have a significant effect, as all those on the motorway would have already been 'underway'.
However this doesn't stop someone going too slowly or experiencing mechanical problems - or someone pulled out or in and made a mistake, with so many driving so close together it is tragically of no surprise that people simply had no time to react and stop properly - driving too close" as a minimum.
Edmund King was interviewed and stated that 'too close' driving added to this and I totally agree with him - spot on. He went on to say about this is the 3rd accident in (about) 10 days where ruptured fuel tanks have caused the road to be effected and that better tanks are needed.
I think that needs proper investigation before quite that decision is made or stated but certainly it sounds worrying.

How it was caused will come to light (I hope) in time but the lorries at the front provide a clue ? It was forecast as windy over recent days so maybe two vehicles (thinking lorries) might have collided - will have to check the embankments .... but TV ariel shots have shown that it is shortly after a bridge ... and that can alter wind patterns.

It is frustrating that with more reminders of good behaviour all those involved might have left better space and perhaps been less involved or less injured.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 21:59 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
Other links for this M5 crash :
ANYONE with more images or info need to notify the Police on the new 101 number (for non emergency calls).

http://www.yeovilexpress.co.uk/news/934 ... _Hospital/ : Were you at the scene? Send your photos or videos to newsdesk@countygazette.co.uk or call 01823-365101.

Worried relatives were urged to call an emergency number set up by police: 0800 092 0410.

Telegraph :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/new ... erset.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Za0K8dI ... r_embedded
On this next video : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8umLEhg ... r_embedded
... there is a car with hazards on - possibly on the hard shoulder ... ahead of the accident - they may have stopped after seeing the carnage behind or might have been involved in the initial incident I guess ... (or a car that simply reversed up to it to help of course ... etc)
Paul O'Conner claims that there was fog around when he drove to the scene after hearing the crash and seeing flames :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8umLEhg ... r_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5vpMCEMCXc

http://www.yeovilexpress.co.uk/news/934 ... _Hospital/

http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16104042
http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16103903 (video)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-15603124

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-storie ... -23539869/
and so on ...

The road was wet but I can't see that there is major water in the videos made soon after the event. Standing water is an unknown, unless someone knows that stretch very well !

Editing to add another Sky News Link : http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16103903
Daily Mail : http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ident.html

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 22:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 10:49
Posts: 76
I know this part of the M5 very well and especially Junction 25

However there is a lot of speculation in the press and media as to the cause of this terrible accident and this afternoon I saw an interview with ROSPA,

What a load of appalling rhetoric from the ROSPA representitive saying that increasing the motorway speed limit will cause more of this type of accident

This is another example of people who do not know what they are talking about using this terrible event to further their own selfish aims

One thing appears to be clear is that none of the vehicles involved were exceeding 60 mph

I suspect that Brake will also jump on the bandwagon soon


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 23:26 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Aye, sad indeed - God rest 'em.

In Cumbria - especially on the M6 round Shap, you sometimes run into fog banks. As stated in that interview, you can run into them pretty quickly, but usually, you can at least see the tail lights of the half dozen or so cars in front disappearing, to give some sort of warning. You then tend to see all the fog lights going on. I wonder if a contributory factor was a load of drivers momentarily taking ther eyes off the road to look for their fog light swithes?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 00:45 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
All possible.
I think that the slip road which I see is also up a hill is close enough to effect this incident. I had thought from earlier photos that it looked further away but it isn't ...
From what I think, I might have put together the first incident - the J B Wheaton lorry (the front one), has just a little o/side front damage which makes me wonder if his accident (however caused) started the train of events (NOT that they all should not have been travelling responsibly and carefully).
The two cars around that vehicle might indicate the first set of mistakes.
The silver car a little further back which looks undamaged or little damaged is, (I think) where the earlier witness recounted getting out and helping others.
The Daily Mail recounts a witness here : http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ident.html (detailed photos), that
Daily Mail - Mr Tom Hamill, wrote:
One of the most extraordinary accounts of the crash came from teacher Tom Hamill, who spoke of rescuing a baby amid the carnage.
Mr Hamill, 25, said a woman, whose car was destroyed, had been struggling to carry her baby and toddler to safety. ‘She was screaming, “Take my baby,”?’ he said.
‘So I took her baby and carried it over the central reservation where I was met again by the mother.
‘She was dragging her toddler away. While I was there a bumper flew off a car and zoomed over my head, I heard my girlfriend scream, “Watch out”.
He said that his car was caught in what he saw as the ‘second wave’ after the initial accident.
He, his girlfriend Katherine Lane, 24, and father George Hamill, 56, were travelling in a Renault Megane which had just joined the motorway at Junction 25.
‘We managed to stop because we had just joined the motorway and were not going too fast,’ he said.
‘But a car came by within seconds at about 70mph and went straight into the lorry in front of us.
‘We are all lucky to be alive. If we had been one yard to the right we would not be here to tell the tale,’ he said.
‘It was just the wall of fog. It was so thick, like driving in emulsion paint, and so sudden. As we came through it, there was a wall of lorries. One jackknifed in front of us.’
Mr Hamill, a music and drama teacher at Merchants’ Academy secondary school in Bristol, praised paramedics and described their efforts as ‘superhuman’.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1csT7TBzl
So that implies fog .... nothing like witness that all help to confuse the issue (already!) However if the fog bank was moving down the motorway then this might help to explain why some saw the 'fog' it and others didn't, or at least less so. Plus the lorries will have helped to disperse the fog cloud too ....

Add this account of fog too :
BBC News wrote:
Motorist James Spurling, of High Wycombe, said: "I had just passed the spot where the accident happened just before 8:30.

"I, along with a car on the inside lane, had to brake very sharply as we both hit a solid wall of white that came out of nowhere.

"The visibility was instantly down to less than three metres and I would say was approximately 200 yards thick, once out the other side it was completely clear."

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 01:32 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
I see here: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-205782 ... ident.html that there is a report of another nearby fire with black smoke :
Daily Mail wrote:
The Taunton Rugby Club's ground where the firework carnival was held is next to the M5 crash scene.

Thick black smoke was generated by the display and a nearby smallholding also had a large bonfire which was spreading black smoke.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1csfTTP7f

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 09:37 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
All possible.
I think that the slip road which I see is also up a hill is close enough to effect this incident. I had thought from earlier photos that it looked further away but it isn't ..


i won't join in the speculation but i also noted the uphill sliproad prior to the site.
m6 north corley services exit suffers similar with trucks coming out of the petrol station with only a few hundred metres before merge.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:24 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
ed_m wrote:
Thoughts go to all involved & families etc that have lost someone last night on the m5.

Lots of idle speculation of course, whatever the trigger i struggle to understand how 25+ vehicles can get it so wrong.


Be careful, some of them might have got it right and pulled up in time, but it only takes the vehicle behind you to get it wrong and you still pay.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 15:12 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
weepej wrote:
ed_m wrote:
Thoughts go to all involved & families etc that have lost someone last night on the m5.

Lots of idle speculation of course, whatever the trigger i struggle to understand how 25+ vehicles can get it so wrong.


Be careful, some of them might have got it right and pulled up in time, but it only takes the vehicle behind you to get it wrong and you still pay.
There are usually actions that you can make or position your car for safer 'action' if you are aware and anticipate 'enough'. I am not saying that there are not times, when no matter how hard you have tried you still become involved, but you are highly likely to, through those considered actions been able to reduce what happens and how involved you have become.
Actions for Safety can usually only happen if you look for them.
This level of awareness is not generally considered 'capable' to most drivers but frankly 'why not'?
Should people not be at least made aware of it and then have a right to choose ?

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 16:01 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
I note that we've got yet another MP investigation into this .On a previous post I mentioned my last recollection of M6/42/69 problems and tried a google on "M6 CRASH IN FOG" - which brought up lots of fog accidents . So ,IF ,this was fog related - WHAT'S HA/DOT (or whatever name they go under doing about it ) .And ,if as this suggests ,the problem has existed for many years ( the one I mentioned was approx 20 years ago) which ministry has swept this under the carpet ?
Of course ,as usual ,it'll all be down to driver error , rather than driver education /road policing .I should imagine with all the advances in opto electronics that it should be possible to design a system that detected fog . WOOPS -that means spending cash for safety ( slappe wrist ),HMG says the motorist should pay for safety -not them . :wink:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 17:02 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
weepej wrote:
ed_m wrote:
Thoughts go to all involved & families etc that have lost someone last night on the m5.

Lots of idle speculation of course, whatever the trigger i struggle to understand how 25+ vehicles can get it so wrong.


Be careful, some of them might have got it right and pulled up in time, but it only takes the vehicle behind you to get it wrong and you still pay.
There are usually actions that you can make or position your car for safer 'action' if you are aware and anticipate 'enough'. I am not saying that there are not times, when no matter how hard you have tried you still become involved, but you are highly likely to, through those considered actions been able to reduce what happens and how involved you have become.
Actions for Safety can usually only happen if you look for them.
This level of awareness is not generally considered 'capable' to most drivers but frankly 'why not'?
Should people not be at least made aware of it and then have a right to choose ?


i've certainly 'saved' myself from getting tangled up (m6 north @ corley coincidentally!) by having a good gap in front, knowing who/what's behind me and anticipating the cars in L3 diving across to avoid a bump & sudden slowing ahead. unfortunately one of the cars in the central reservation had launched a volley of ping pong ball sized gravel/ballast into the air one of which chose to succumb to gravity just as i was passing underneath... geez the noise in the cabin was alarming!

gets me thinking then what proportion of "good" to "poor" drivers you need to diffuse a situation.
or is it just the usual problem that 98% of the time this kind of poor driving doesnt lead to an accident or any negative feedback to the driver, and the times that it does the consequences are worse.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 17:40 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
I read the Sunday Express this morning. I don't usually read papers, but it was worth a look to see if the usual brigade is up to their old tricks.

Lo and behold.....

Sunday Express wrote:
The crash prompted call last night to lower the speed limit on motorways...

That's right, these people want to make an all-encompassing, stinging policy change, based on one event in decades, with the cause of that event still unknown - how disingenuous! Could such an extreme knee-jerk reaction ever be good for road safety?
It could be that a faulty fuel tank lead to the fire, which in turn lead to the deaths; so why their immediate focus on travelling speed?

Sunday Express wrote:
The crash could also spell the end for the controversial plan to increase the motorway speed limit from 70 to 80mph.

Initial statements from witnesses indicated that, because of conditions, folks weren't even travelling at the current speed limit, so why the focus on that proposal?

Sunday Express wrote:
Ellen Booth, senior campaigns officer for road safety charity Brake, said: "if we increase the maximum speed limit, this will lead to more crashes. This crash brings home how important it is to reduce casualties on our roads [what kind of comment is this!], which raising the speed limit will not do.

Not only do these people like to base policy on the 'N=1 sample size' fallacy, they also like to consider factors in isolation.

The cheap points scoring from these people is disgusting, more so given the scale of the tragedy.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 18:37 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Latest on Yahoo news says it was not FOG ,but smoke from fireworks --- so will we see a clampdown on the sale of fireworks .(Paron me whilst I fire a rocket at that flying pig).
Still my comment on visability detection on motorways still makes sense ,n'est pas ?
Seems to me that if a fraction of the money spent on enforcement was spent on road safty -this & other incicents might be prevented .Also seems that every time we have some weather problems with weather -the UK road system shuts down .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.033s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]