Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Oct 26, 2025 13:46

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 15:21 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
I'm posting this because the following has occured to me three times now in the past two months. I had never had it happen before then in 8 years of driving.

When braking at an amber light, the car behind has overtaken me on the wrong side of the road in order top run it on red!

Ok it could be a coincidence that I've recently had this happen three times, but it seems like a it's new craze or something :!:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 15:51 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Zamzara wrote:
I'm posting this because the following has occured to me three times now in the past two months. I had never had it happen before then in 8 years of driving.

When braking at an amber light, the car behind has overtaken me on the wrong side of the road in order top run it on red!

Ok it could be a coincidence that I've recently had this happen three times, but it seems like a it's new craze or something :!:


You're not getting them frustrated are you? (Forgive me for asking, but it's so damn common for our driving to affect others... We must always ask.)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 16:48 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Maybe they are frustrated, but if so it's only because I am obeying the traffic lights and they don't want to. I'm not doing anything unusual.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 18:06 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
Whatever the reason it is obviously a dangerous craze.

Are they suddenly appearing behind you and overtaking or have they been following for a while?

If they have been following were they driving aggressively or did they seem to be quite calm? Did they seem to be looking for an overtaking opportunity?

Are they Isle of Wight residents or tourists? Or is this on the mainland?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 18:19 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
I have had numerous cases recently of cars overtaking by going on the wrong side of bollards. It has coincided with the increased use of these things to filter traffic.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 18:33 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
Gizmo wrote:
I have had numerous cases recently of cars overtaking by going on the wrong side of bollards. It has coincided with the increased use of these things to filter traffic.


Noticed the same around here too (both the overtaking on the wrong side of a keep-left bollard, and the increased use of bollards/islands to mess up the free flow of vehicles) :(


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 18:44 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
I was going through some traffic calming chicanes the other morning on my way to work when the car in front just went through them on the other side of the road.

Perhaps this is the increased safety that the planners intended when they introduced the scheme.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 19:16 
Offline
Police Officer
Police Officer

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 20:50
Posts: 88
Location: South West
Had someone do this to me this morning. Quite funny really, watching how his facial expression in his mirror changed as I treated him to a free display of disco lighting from behind the front grille !!

There is a serious point though - traffic planners seem to love traffic lights more and more, yet they are rarely appropriate - people get held for too long and with no other traffic around, so the light's credibility disappears. Quite a few other countries have a flashing red or amber, which allows turning with traffic flow if clear (e.g. in UK turning left if nothing else around). Trouble is, does the average motorist have the intelligence to use this concept ?

Actually, quite an interesting day today - very few speeders around but a lot of mainly elderly people driving far too slowly (well, it is a Sunday) and I got a fascinating diatribe from one gent I pulled for doing 45mph in middle lane of a motorway. But, as usual, hoardes of people driving whilst using handheld phones...what have we got to do to get this message across?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 19:28 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Homer wrote:
Are they suddenly appearing behind you and overtaking or have they been following for a while?

If they have been following were they driving aggressively or did they seem to be quite calm? Did they seem to be looking for an overtaking opportunity?


It happens in slow moving queues, not at fast speed. Should have mentioned that earlier.

Quote:
Are they Isle of Wight residents or tourists? Or is this on the mainland?


One was in Kingston upon Thames, the other two here on the Island.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 19:44 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
Zamzara wrote:
One was in Kingston upon Thames, the other two here on the Island.

What you describe sounds pretty "normal" for Kingston Upon Thames.
The standard of driving in Kingston is probably brought about by the fact that there are traffic lights approximately 100 metres apart, and they seem to be phased so that you hit every single one on red if you actually obey them.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 20:41 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
I've seen it happen at Staveley level crossing - lights and bells going, and an idiot drove around two vehicles slowing to stop before the barrier dropped, and crossed the line in front of oncoming traffic!
I believe Zamzara is correct in that there is a breed of driver about now who just does not give a ****.

Re. Cotswolds post, would it be possible to kill the phonecells adjacent to the motorway? There ARE still emergency phones a mile apart, which could give low power coverage, thus preventing calls on the move, but allowing calls from stationary phones within 1/2 mile. :idea:

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 20:44 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Re. Cotswolds post, would it be possible to kill the phonecells adjacent to the motorway? There ARE still emergency phones a mile apart, which could give low power coverage, thus preventing calls on the move, but allowing calls from stationary phones within 1/2 mile. :idea:

This would also prevent entirely legal calls from handsfree phones, or from passengers, of course.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 20:45 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4813
Location: Essex
Ernest Marsh wrote:
I've seen it happen at Staveley level crossing - lights and bells going, and an idiot drove around two vehicles slowing to stop before the barrier dropped, and crossed the line in front of oncoming traffic!
I believe Zamzara is correct in that there is a breed of driver about now who just does not give a ****.

Re. Cotswolds post, would it be possible to kill the phonecells adjacent to the motorway? There ARE still emergency phones a mile apart, which could give low power coverage, thus preventing calls on the move, but allowing calls from stationary phones within 1/2 mile. :idea:


Unfair surely on passengers conducting business on the way to a meeting.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 20:55 
Offline
Police Officer
Police Officer

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 20:50
Posts: 88
Location: South West
Quote:
Re. Cotswolds post, would it be possible to kill the phonecells adjacent to the motorway? There ARE still emergency phones a mile apart, which could give low power coverage, thus preventing calls on the move, but allowing calls from stationary phones within 1/2 mile.


Hope not, how else can I tell the missus I'm on overtime scraping someone off the road ?

Not forgetting doing that would probably bugger up our Tetra system anyway....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 21:39 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 14:35
Posts: 58
cotswold wrote:
.... and I got a fascinating diatribe from one gent I pulled for doing 45mph in middle lane of a motorway.




Well maybe if you were out catching proper criminals instead........... :roll: (ducks and runs)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 21:41 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 17:37
Posts: 702
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
cotswold wrote:
Actually, quite an interesting day today - very few speeders around but a lot of mainly elderly people driving far too slowly (well, it is a Sunday) and I got a fascinating diatribe from one gent I pulled for doing 45mph in middle lane of a motorway. But, as usual, hoardes of people driving whilst using handheld phones...what have we got to do to get this message across?


I wouldn't bother. It's not a major problem IMHO.

BTW I think you're right about the excessive use of traffic lights. Scarborough Borough Council have made a real hash of theirs, which has increased the incentive for people to jump the lights. Too short a period on the green is a principal failing in their case.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 22:15 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 20:00
Posts: 115
Location: Berkshire
Daily journey to work takes me around a large traffic signal controlled roundabout which leads on to a motorway. Having driven around it almost every morning for twelve years I know the way the lights work and if I am stoped at one set then unless you have a very vey quick car then you will be stopped at the next set of lights.

I anticipate being stoped and although I move off quickly on the green I expect to be stopped and drive so that I can do so safely without leaving rubber on the road, however up my exhaust pipe is muppet one, shaving, drinking coffee, mobile phone in the ear I kid you not seen it all on a fairly regular basis. (Where are you IN GEAR & Co when needed?). I therefore have to drive for this fool behind me going a little slower than I would like so that he does not go in the back of me when I stop because he expects me to run the amber. If he wishes to run the amber or red then that is up to them.

Anyone got any better courses of action?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 22:50 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
Is this perhaps a perverse form of "risk compensation".

In other words if you stop us from speeding we'll break a different law instead - ie running traffic lights. If you install cameras to stop us doing that we'll go the wrong side of traffic islands, just for the hell of it, etc. etc.

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 22:58 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 22:35
Posts: 643
Location: South Wales
JT wrote:
Is this perhaps a perverse form of "risk compensation".

In other words if you stop us from speeding we'll break a different law instead - ie running traffic lights. If you install cameras to stop us doing that we'll go the wrong side of traffic islands, just for the hell of it, etc. etc.


Makes you think doesn't it?

I came across something last year (and once this year) when driving to work. A exit a dual carriage way and head towards a roundabout - road is still 2 lane. At the roundabout there is a very simple choice left, straight on, right.

On a number of occasions I have seen people in fairly expensive and high powered cars (I have nothing against such vehicles, in fact I hanker for them, - just a note that only people in such vehicles attempted action) would overtake all of the left lane (the busiest) stay in the 2nd lane and yet out accelerate those in the left lane and turn left!

Complete madness that has nearly caused an accident every single time I have seen one of these idiots try it.

As of yet no camera will catch these prats but I am sure it will not be long before a sub 40mph(limit on road) accident will occur and a speed camera will be erected.

edited to add - I saw this happen 10-15 times towrds the end of last year - although only once this year.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2005 00:12 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
They probably do that because all the good safe overtaking areas now contain bollards, islands or gatsos.

The thing I find most frustrating is being stuck behind a person doing an indicated 60 (no problem with that part) who goes around a corner far slower than I would like to. It is virtually impossible to legally overtake them except for just after certain junctions or on steep hills.

Whilst I'd never do some of the things mentioned above in order to get past, I can see why people do.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.020s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]