Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Jun 24, 2026 23:52

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 13:46 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
SPEED AWARENESS COURSES CHANGE DRIVERS
PRESS RELEASE FROM THE TTC GROUP,the UK’s leading provider of driver training courses.
0845 270 4380 www.ttc-uk.com January 18th 2013 with image of Professor Robin Martin and video presentation at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szG-A5dxznU

Speed awareness courses in Avon and Somerset work – that’s the conclusion of independent research published today.

Education courses for speeding drivers have a “long term impact” on driving behaviour, reveals a new study carried out by Professor Robin Martin, of Aston University Business School, Birmingham.
“A speed awareness course does improve people’s attitude and intention not to speed in the future,” said Professor Martin, who headed the in depth 18 month research project into the impact of the course.
He said that it was “one of the best” designed studies to examine the long term benefits of speed awareness courses which were introduced by the Government across the UK to re-educate drivers’ and reduce road casualties as a more constructive alternative to fines or prosecution.

Chief Inspector John Holt of Avon and Somerset’s Operations and Roads Policing Unit , said: “We welcome the findings of the study which reinforce our belief that education is a positive alternative to prosecution, influencing driver behaviour and making the roads safer for all.
“With TTC 2000 as our new education provider our levels of enforcement and education have risen considerably, with projections forecasting in excess of 100,000 people being caught speeding from April 2012 to the end of March 2013.”

Course are held in Bridgwater, Keynsham, Taunton, Bristol, Chipping Sodbury, Yeovil and Weston Super Mare.

Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) researcher Cara Donald interviewed 1,311 motorists caught speeding from five police regions between November 2010 and April 2012. They had all opted to attend the course delivered by the not for profit TTC 2000, part of the TTC Group, the UK’s largest course provider.
Professor Martin and Cara carried out a comprehensive review of how people behaved before and after the course, how much they learned and their attitude to the course, including their future intention to positively modify their driving behaviour.

They tracked their views before attending the course, immediately after and up to six weeks later. Interviewees were encouraged to voluntarily participate in the research and complete a series of questionnaires and attend some focus groups in lieu of a donation made to the NSPCC for each response. A total of £2,315 was presented to the NSPCC.

Professor Martin, an academic who analyses data, admitted that he had never heard of speed awareness courses before being asked to carry out the totally independent research study.
“The results clearly show that the speed awareness course led to reliable improvements in client’s attitude to speeding and importantly their intention not to break the speed limit,” he said during a launch of the research findings to senior police personnel and national road policing officers.
“The benefit of the course occurred immediately and persisted several weeks after course delivery. The speed awareness course led to very reliable improvements in clients’ attitude towards not speeding.”

Many people originally attended the course just to avoid three points on their licence but once they completed the course, they realised how good it was, he said.
A total of 80 per cent said they would attend the course again because they knew they would learn something. Course material was shared among more than just the course attender with a “cascade” effect through family and friends.
Older women had a more positive attitude not to speed than younger men after attending the course, revealed the report.
The motorist’s view of the need for safer road initiatives improved as a consequence of attending the course because they had learned useful information and realised the importance of driving within the required speed limit.
The course challenged misconceptions, raised awareness and positively impacted upon motorist’s future intentions. It helped people to take personal responsibility for the motoring behaviour within a non-judgemental environment.

The research showed that people who blamed others for ‘their’ speeding and had a ‘mindset’ that they shouldn’t be on the course had a more negative view of the education and consequently were less likely to change their behaviour as a result, said Professor Martin.
People who had already amassed penalty points on their driving licence had a lower attitude to the course benefits. Older people had the best attitude, particularly older women. The amount of annual mileage did not have any significant impact on the results.

Attitude and future intentions were positively influenced by the wide variety of motorists of all ages on the course. Individually and collectively participants felt able to reconsider their behaviour and attitudes once they realised they were not alone, added the Professor.

END

Notes to news editor:
Professor Martin’s presentation of the report can be viewed at (Part 1) Cara Warburton: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7Rls6l--T0
(Part 2) Prof. Robin Martin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szG-A5dxznU
Professor Robin Martin is Professor of Social and Organisational Psychology Work and Organisational Psychology Research Group at Aston Business School., Aston University, Birmingham.

Questionnaires were sent out randomly to motorists who attended a speed awareness course in South Yorkshire, Durham, West Mercia, West Midlands and Mid & South Wales. TTC 2000 course instructors were not aware of who was involved in the survey. All questionnaires were returned to Aston University.

People were asked if a speed awareness course essentially improved their intention not to speed in the future/was it good or bad to speed/could they stick to the speed limit/and was it morally correct to keep within the limit.

The TTC Group instigated and jointly funded the KTP research in partnership with Aston University. However, the project was independently conducted by Cara Donald and Professor Martin but supported by a steering group drawn from key stakeholders.
TTC 2000, part of the TTC Group, was involved in the pilot scheme to introduce speed awareness courses in the UK and runs courses in South Yorkshire, Cumbria, Durham, West Mercia, West Midlands, Mid & South Wales, Avon & Somerset, Devon & Cornwall. It is also involved in introducing Driving 4 Change and What’s Driving Us? courses for motorists who commit minor traffic infringements such as red lights. TTC 2000 was formed in 1993 and also runs drink drive rehabilitation courses across the UK.

Their HQ was officially opened by the Princess Royal in 2006. TTC Group chairman Graham Wynn has received the OBE for services to road safety.

For more information or interview please contact TTC Group publicity co-ordinator Elaine Adams on 01952 505026/07970019184. publicity@elaineadams.com
Please email Professor Robert Martin for any more information: r.martin@aston.ac.uk
http://www.abs.aston.ac.uk/newweb/staff ... D=A0000685

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 13:48 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
The research they did is total bias as it only includes those who took the course as opposed to penalty points !
It is meaningless !
:(

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 19:24 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Report wrote:
A speed awareness course does improve people’s attitude and intention not to speed in the future

But does it improve road safety?

This report focuses on the outcomes of the courses and not the underlying issues. It's a typical example of losing sight of the real objective. Wasn't there an insurance company report which found that attendees on SACs were more at risk of a collision?

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 19:38 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Just read the article. I'm ( possibly justified having been invilved in campaigning for truth in some local issues) suspicious as to how many replies that"didn't fit in with the expected resp[onse" were "lost" .
Bear that in mind and look at the "bank charges" finallie . And "WMD" .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 21:41 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
I could-have/should-have died in 1978 when I had an accident. (Long story).

But I was 19 and, for reasons best discussed as as separate topic, continued in my ways... No flashbacks, no fear of losing life, injury or infimity or consideration for others.

Now, at my age, I have flashbacks, fear losing life, injury or infirmity, and AWAYS think about others.

I wonder why my insurance is so high after decades of accident-free driving & riding but realise I'm pissed off with someone just like like I was, and paying for, someone just like me so long ago.

What's this got to do with the O/P? These initiatives don't make safe good drivers any safer, (but raises revenue), and won't change an idiotic young driver, (for whom 'we' all pay ).

So if/when I get done for speeding and I can't or won't explain or write of this concept to someone whom may or may not understand, I'm just saying...

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 22:21 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Sadly ,Tone, the day when we get done for infringing some petty violation will be when, not if. As the list of "possible customers" dries up the vultures are looking for ways to increase the take. After all there's one vast cash hungry machine to feed . (And "expert witnesses" to take a cut).

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 00:54 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
1) it is bias as it only surveyed those who attended the course !
2) there is no proof ever that 'enforced learning' ever works and certainly never inspires better long term driver attitudes, skills knowledge nor abilities.
3) whilst some extra information might encourage those to learn more, as they are at least thinking about driving, bad information imparted can do more harm than good.
4) courses are varied in length cost and teachings - they claim it is 'set Nationally' but different groups do things differently.
5) Speed is their prime focus and goal to teach in that 'slower is (somehow) by itself therefore better' !

6) Proper road safety educates without threatening livelihoods nor lifestyles
7) Wrong teachings have far reaching consequences as the public think they are safer when they could very well not be
8) encourages drivers to be less confident, as simply going more slowly makes no sense when it is safer (and legal) to go faster

A) We must have drivers who understand how to be safe and how to drive safely all the time
B) adjusting their speeds to the conditions and ensuring that when they travel they can stop in the distance that they know to be clear is one of the PRIME whys to ensure road safety
C) COAST principals
D) there is never a time to drive at an inappropriate speed !

Been trying to get this link to work for the survey questions : http://www.ttc.uk.com/surveys/?ref=59e7 ... a77f63fd86 (referenced from their other KTP Project video on you tube here : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7Rls6l--T0 )

And the TTC Group now have a company 'Managed Road Safety Solutions' where they are 'offering a total road safety' package to Councils !! OMG ! :(
Their Company video : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sBgP63dKlk Chairman Graham Wynn (former Magistrate).

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 14:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 17:37
Posts: 702
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
The research they did is total bias as it only includes those who took the course as opposed to penalty points !
It is meaningless !
:(


"The motorist’s view of the need for safer road initiatives improved as a consequence of attending the course because they had learned useful information and realised the importance of driving within the required speed limit."

Er, no! I hope they did acquire useful information, but what is more important is that they learn to drive more safely: that is what matters. The desirablility of complying with speed limits has little to do with that, although they should be respected in built-up areas.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 15:18 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
The easiest way to convince people of anything is for it to be true. What the ‘speed kills’ culture and dumbing down of limits has done is say we are telling you something which is true for all and any instance; which is a blatant lie. :x

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 17:44 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
TripleS wrote:
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
The research they did is total bias as it only includes those who took the course as opposed to penalty points !
It is meaningless !
:(


"The motorist’s view of the need for safer road initiatives improved as a consequence of attending the course because they had learned useful information and realised the importance of driving within the required speed limit."

Er, no! I hope they did acquire useful information, but what is more important is that they learn to drive more safely: that is what matters. The desirability of complying with speed limits has little to do with that, although they should be respected in built-up areas.
But this is the whole point the course is only there to state that going within the limit is a requirement to avoid points and courses, it has no intention to do anything else, nothing to prove about road safety or better drivers - nothing.
It was purely starting out to show whether people kept more within the limit after the course.
They prove they can't use the main data that shows a few 'intended to' then re-use it to show that the course (now about impacting about people's attitude) has 'worked'. They change the goal post so much it is no longer worthy of ANY consideration.

Cara states that 'it is a given' that people would rather do a course than have points, but the group that do reject it they slot into a box called 29 factors covering things like child car, work etc as reasons for non attendance including those who later cancel their course and accept the points (and for those data protection prevented them from analysing those as the Police will have to).
Not once have they tried to look at IF speed is 'needed' as much as is being promoted and it was entirely dismissed and rejected to change the course or it's content (which at least they questioned but TTC refused that !)
Their whole aim then is to look into how to get more people onto the course. Nothing about how it will help road safety nor benefit others or even including the drivers themselves. just about how to benefit their client. And that's what I expect of a client based profit industry, they want to help their client. I'd love to think that people could be honest enough to tell the truth but why wasn't this then explained in detail ?
I thought initially that they might have proven a link to better driving but there is no such thing going on.
Sad that our 'safety' on the road is now boiling down to a few feet of a technical offence if "you're unlucky to get caught" (as they say people are phrasing it !).

They now are going as far as recommending to government that all speeding /fines should be raised so that going on the course is more likely !!!

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 18:28 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
Big Tone wrote:
The easiest way to convince people of anything is for it to be true. What the ‘speed kills’ culture and dumbing down of limits has done is say we are telling you something which is true for all and any instance; which is a blatant lie. :x
Otherwise called social engineering ! Get all your groups of peers to accept something and then you all are 'expected' to behave in the same manner ! Not everyone but all those at both ends of the extreme scales can be 'ignored' - and yep exactly what they have done here too !

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.041s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]