Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat May 15, 2021 05:01

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:56 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 702
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: From BBC Newsbeat

About 200 new drivers had their licences revoked each week in 2012, figures obtained by Newsbeat show.

A Freedom of Information request to the DVLA found 10,797 drivers with fewer than two years' experience lost their licences.

More than half of those were found without insurance, with speeding the second most common cause.

The figures, the latest available, showed the number had fallen by 13% since 2010 - from 12,461.

Around 0.6% of licences were revoked as a result of driving under the influence of drink or drugs.

If drivers receive six or more points within the first two years of driving they have to resit their tests.

Scott Pendry, of the Association of British Insurers (ABI), said the reason a high proportion of drivers were prosecuted for being uninsured was because they were easier to catch.

Due to advances in technology people driving uninsured are being identified in a much better way
Scott Pendry, Association of British Insurers
"Due to advances in technology, people driving uninsured are being identified in a much better way. So if they are not on the central database showing they are insured, they will face severe ramifications," he said.

The ABI said it supported calls for better driver training, curfews and the introduction of a minimum learning period.

The figures show the number caught driving without the minimum third party insurance has fallen slightly, with 5,884 new drivers caught compared with 5,920 in 2010.

No sympathy

The Motor Insurance Bureau, which calculates the number of uninsured drivers on UK roads, says the figure supported its research, which suggested the number of uninsured drivers was falling.

Natasha Brydon

Natasha Brydon, from Hawick in the Scottish Borders, has five points on her licence and is at risk of having it revoked.

"It's unfair to have your licence revoked for silly mistakes that end up getting you points," says the 22-year-old.

Ms Brydon bumped into a car in a supermarket car park. She says she panicked and left the scene.

"It was a horrible experience," she says. "Minor mistakes should be forgiven. It would be different if it's drink-driving or serious speeding.

"I don't feel I should have been let off but to be categorised with people who have perhaps hit a person is a bit unfair, I think."

It estimated that in 2009 one in six drivers did not have basic cover, but now it is about one in 17.

It suggested it could be because more innovative products had been introduced in the insurance market for young drivers.

The data showed 2,139 new drivers had their licence revoked for speeding.

Road safety charity Brake said it was not surprised and did not have any sympathy for drivers who received six points.

Its campaigns adviser Gary Rae said the drivers were putting themselves and others at risk "in a moment's madness".

He said: "We don't want to be heavy about this. We want to protect new drivers. They are a vulnerable group of people."

He also believes proper enforcement is as important as education.

"It's tempting, isn't it? It's exciting, you've passed your test. You may have a new car and you want to put your foot down," he said.

"But please don't. It's reckless and it can end up in death, and that does happen."

'Cautioned on the spot'

Chris Moore, from Southend, Essex, had his licence revoked 18 months after passing his test.

He was caught after bumping another vehicle at a roundabout but said he had not been intentionally driving without insurance.

"I was a named driver on my dad's policy but his car was broken down at the time.

"He wanted me to run an errand. We checked the policy and it said the 'policyholder could drive any other car'."

Mr Moore drove another car but as he returned home he shunted a vehicle in front.

"It wasn't until we got to the police station to hand in documents the next day that I was told I wasn't covered."

Mr Moore and his father had misunderstood the terms of the policy. As a "named driver", Mr Moore was not the "policyholder".

He said: "If we'd spotted it I'd have never driven the car. I was cautioned on the spot.

"It was about six months later that I went to court. The magistrate was happy that I didn't do it deliberately but the least they could give me was a £125 fine and six points."

Interesting, isn't it that speeding only accounts for around 20% of licence revocations? If you're driving without valid insurance, I have no sympathy for you. You must be insured. That's the law.

Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 14:27 
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9274
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Brake waffler said "He also believes proper enforcement is as important as education." Pity then that Brake only shout about enforcement.

lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 5 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.058s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]