The DVLA do suggest that
The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency said any eventual changes would be subject to full public consultation.
"We are carrying out initial research to explore how the driving test could better reflect real-life driving," said a DVSA spokesman.
I think that encouraging as developing and looking to improve can be a good thing.
I do feel that with a vast and recent increase of foreign drivers who's ability is unlikely to be of the same (likely worse) level as UK drivers there is nothing in the Stats 19 to indicate if or when accidents occur with foreign Nations involved what driving qualifications they have. Therefor there is no link to those who do or do not hold a UK licence.
If they replace the 3 point turn (which is a good thing) to one of reverse parking OR one of pulling out to join traffic neither replaces the 3 point turn although all 3 ought to be in the test as a matter of course and necessity IMHO. There are many who seem very underconfident, but lets not forget that by informing drivers that driving skill is reduced to one of 'speed' as a priority lack of confidence is one that we will see. Therefor it is of little surprise that drivers are travelling with less skill and ability.
Adding aspects to the test might have a transient benefit but it is likely to only be temporary. However enforce all those who drive in the UK to take a full UK licence and the standards are likely to climb to a degree.
Reminding drivers that they are fully responsible and need to act in a predicable manner is also very important.
However I have found people saying (not been able to verify all the points) that they have been taught to indicate right when approaching a roundabout when intending to go 'straight' over.
Also that people are being taught to go from the slip road straight into the outside lane of a dual carriageway (to allow room for those joining) but I am thinking that some of these 'teachings' are simply mis-understood phrases !
Clarity on pulling out would be useful and some aspects of full motorway driving now ought to be tested with so many new signs and features being added, however that does add an impossible problem for those who are simply too far to join a motorway and one with those specific features so that will have to be proper compromises of A road similar features and principles. It is always an achievement that once passed the test you can go on the motorways but I think some people (and it seems often women) do need additional tuition. However tuition is available so what stops people from wanting to learn more? Money? Time? Effort? All three?
Reversing into real world parking spaces would perhaps be a good thing as going around a corner does teach the principal of going back but not the system of how to parallel park. So why isn't PP taught - even if only as an after pass course?
Perhaps this tells us that there are is a list of needs... One's that aren't really 'needed' to be in the test to be OK for the road, but those that once taught really help you have greater control and better handling of your car, in more detailed real world situations?
If that's the case, then should these needs not then be compulsory perhaps?
A bit like a post-passed course? One you have to take and succeed in? But then why not before you pass the test and one a qualified instructor can pass you in? A kind of NVQ prior to the full test? Might this whole step not help people realise that the learning is a step process?
Maybe even encourage those who can see they are improving and passing the smaller steps along the way? Maye even making the test less scary?
The DVSA said drivers may instead be asked to focus on more realistic everyday manoeuvres, such as reversing out of a parking bay, or re-joining the flow of traffic from the side of a road.
But reverse parking - either into a parking bay or parallel parking - would remain as one of the manoeuvres candidates could be asked to perform, a spokesman said.
The two vehicle-safety questions are currently asked at the start of the test. In future, one these may be asked while the candidate is driving. The DVSA said a candidate, for example, may be asked to show how they would operate the rear heated screen while driving.
line
The driving test
First introduced in 1935
Test suspended during World War Two and the Suez crisis in 1956
Hand signals dropped in 1975 and theory test introduced in 1996
Practical test made up of eyesight check; vehicle safety questions; general driving ability; reversing vehicle safely, independent driving
Pass rate in 1935 was 63% compared with 46% in 2009
More than 46 million tests taken since 1946
line
The Driving Instructors Association welcomed the plans.
Its chief executive Carly Brookfield said: "DIA has been heavily involved in the scoping of this project and is enthusiastic about the opportunity it presents to evolve the L-test to a level where it more realistically assesses a candidate's ability to competently and safely manage road based risk and driving in real life, on real roads."
RAC Foundation director Professor Stephen Glaister said: "We all rely on our sat navs but they are not infallible and it is when they have led us down a dead end that we need to know how to do a three-point turn.
"It's fine to add some aspects to the test but we should be cautious about removing the basics."