Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Nov 11, 2025 00:31

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 20:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:15
Posts: 318
Location: Co Durham
This one's hard to beat - seen this afternoon. Female driving large white van down the road. Right hand holding mobile phone to left ear, left hand holding iced lolly with left forearm flat on the top of the steering wheel. Can anyone beat that? :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 21:19 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 15:13
Posts: 269
Of course, this new style of driving must be quite safe because you don't mention getting flashed by the Gatso at the end of the street - so it wasn't speeding and endangering all of the rest of us, eh?

This country's batchy


Last edited by PaulF on Sat Jun 11, 2005 21:33, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 21:24 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
Best one I ever saw was in a factory where I used to work.

I was walking down the main factory road when a "Benford" dumper truck came the other way. This is the type with a forward facing tipper where the driver sits at the back next to the engine, for those unfamiliar.

Well all I could see as it approached was that this thing had a six foot high stack of scaffold planks stacked transversely across the top of the "dumper" part, with someone's head just visible above it.

My assumption was that the driver had his mate stood up next to him to see over the load, ready to warn him if he needed to stop.

Wrong. As it passed by me I saw that there was but one driver, who was balanced on one foot on top of the engine compartment, and using the other foot to steer. In his hand he had an 8 foot length of 3"x2" which he was using to press the accelerator pedal down with so that the thing would go!

Still, at least he wasn't speeding!

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 02:17 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I believe that 'being in control' is more a mental condition than a physical one. I'm worried that we tend to measure how in control a driver might be by what he's doing with his hands.

Of course certain uses of the hands might well indicate that the mind is elsewhere. And clearly JT's wild example would indcate a seriously risky approach to controlling a vehicle. But it's mind, mind, mind, not hands, hands, hands.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 04:07 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4813
Location: Essex
A year or two back my right knee gave way at work. To get home I had to adopt a very difficult posture. I could only get my knee comfy by having my right lower leg encroaching in the left part of the footwell.

My walking stick sat across my lap to work the throttle with my left hand

My left foot covered the brake and was used solely on the brake - I dared not swing that foot sideways to try to use the throttle - it would have hurt my knee too much.

This left my right hand for steering - and the 4WS Accord needed only one grab for 95% or more manouevres - only just a turn and a half lock to lock.

Well - first couple of take offs I spun wheels. First couple of gentle stops were very viscious. After that... I doubt without looking in anyone could tell it was not being controlled normally. Ok - had an emergency arisen life may have been difficult - to override the lizard brain from crucifying my knee, but it didn't.

I felt - and was - in control. I was ultra-cautious - in "chauffeur" mode if you like - but that was to minimise any need for lizard brain stuff, not because I was concerned that my makeshift arrangement couldn't cope.

As Paul says - mind is control, not hands. Hands are just an extension of the mind in this instance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 08:44 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
A Cyclist wrote:
This one's hard to beat - seen this afternoon. Female driving large white van down the road. Right hand holding mobile phone to left ear, left hand holding iced lolly with left forearm flat on the top of the steering wheel. Can anyone beat that? :)

How about having a mobile phone wedged between shoulder and ear, both hands occupied rolling a cigarette, using knees to keep the steering wheel straight, and all this while on the motorway :o

If you think the above scenario is made up, then come & meet my father in law

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 09:09 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
A Cyclist wrote:
This one's hard to beat - seen this afternoon. Female driving large white van down the road. Right hand holding mobile phone to left ear, left hand holding iced lolly with left forearm flat on the top of the steering wheel. Can anyone beat that? :)


Bah, no mention of reading the A-Z, not a real white van person then. :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 09:28 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
A Cyclist wrote:
Female driving large white van down the road. Right hand holding mobile phone to left ear, left hand holding iced lolly with left forearm flat on the top of the steering wheel. Can anyone beat that? :)


Oh no....... :o
White van woman........does this prove Darwin is right?

Must be natural selection at work. Its the only explanation.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 12:00 
Offline
Police Officer
Police Officer

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 20:50
Posts: 88
Location: South West
Quote:
This one's hard to beat - seen this afternoon. Female driving large white van down the road. Right hand holding mobile phone to left ear, left hand holding iced lolly with left forearm flat on the top of the steering wheel. Can anyone beat that?


Oh if only you knew.... :lol:

Everyday in this job you wake up thinking you've seen every possible example of stupidity on the roads. And most days you're proved wrong!!

Best one ever ? Undoubtedly a woman driving along actually changing a baby's nappy while baby was on her lap....even I had to look twice before I actually believed it.

"Taking dictation" is quite common (i.e. on the phone and writing something down whilst driving) as is seeing people reach into the back to get papers, comfort baby, etc...

Its all good fun.... :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 13:20 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
cotswold wrote:
Quote:
This one's hard to beat - seen this afternoon. Female driving large white van down the road. Right hand holding mobile phone to left ear, left hand holding iced lolly with left forearm flat on the top of the steering wheel. Can anyone beat that?


Oh if only you knew.... :lol:

Everyday in this job you wake up thinking you've seen every possible example of stupidity on the roads. And most days you're proved wrong!!



How true!
Quote:
Best one ever ? Undoubtedly a woman driving along actually changing a baby's nappy while baby was on her lap....even I had to look twice before I actually believed it.


One of the lads here came across one woman breast feeding at the wheel :shock:
Quote:

"
Its all good fun.... :roll:



:lol: :lol: :lol: Indeed!

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:56 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
SafeSpeed wrote:
I'm worried that we tend to measure how in control a driver might be by what he's doing with his hands. ... But it's mind, mind, mind, not hands, hands, hands.


I agree - there is an awful lot of focus about how you must have two hands on the wheel at all times, other wise you are not in control. And we get TV coverage about how teenager gets slammed by "road safety experts" and consequently parents when spotted by in car spy cam driving with only one hand on the wheel.

As Richard Burns says (the World Rally Championship Driver, very well known for driving with one hand on the wheel ): "it used to be the case the two hands were needed to maintain control, but with todays power assisted steering, this is no longer true." (might not be his exact words, but it is what he was saying).

At high speeds, two hands are indeed very important, but in general those speeds are not legal on UK roads - certainly it is not vital to have two hands on the wheel while driving at 70mph on most motorways, or when driving in urban areas. People that say that it is (although how you are supposed to change gear) are yet again creating sweeping global rules based on the requirement of a few specific situations, and are treating all drivers as mindless idiots by insisting that their rules must always be followed.

If anybody says that it is, then I would respond: Are you proposing that all people with a disability affecting an arm should be banned from driving?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:43 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Rewolf wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I'm worried that we tend to measure how in control a driver might be by what he's doing with his hands. ... But it's mind, mind, mind, not hands, hands, hands.


I agree - there is an awful lot of focus about how you must have two hands on the wheel at all times, other wise you are not in control.

True, but what the hands are doing can often be an indicator of what the mind is concentrating on. One hand on the wheel while the other is doing something driving related, that's fine obviously. One hand on the wheel while the other is lighting a fag / operating a mobile phone / looking for sweets / giving young backseat passenger a clip round the ear / turning pages in the A-Z / trying to undo the bra of the front seat passenger :yikes: (which can be tricky enough on a sofa if you ask me :oops: :lol: ) etc, well, it all sort of suggests that the driver's mind is preoccupied with something other than driving safely.

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 13:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:15
Posts: 318
Location: Co Durham
I think that the requirement to keep both hands on the steering wheel in the "ten to two" or "quarter to three" position dates back to the days when a high-speed tyre blowout was a distinct possibility whereas these days it is a very rare occurrence (unless the BiB know differently from their experiences of this happening to others).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 14:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
Yes, at high speed, definitely - even a gust of wind can cause problems then, but the "rule" is definitely being interpreted as an absolute rule at all speeds - so for example taking your hand off the wheel and resting it on your leg while at 30 mph was enough for the youth on telly to be slammed for his dangerous driving style. It is even being used in prosecutions such as the infamous Kit-Kat prosecution where if I remember correctly, the passenger had unwrapped it and the driver was prosecuted for eating it, or the woman with her bottle of water.

Now I don't know the exact details of either case, and cannot say whether they were dangerous for other reasons, but the message is definitely that if you haven't got two hands on the wheel, then you are driving dangerously. This is about as misleading as "Speed Kills" because concentration is not broken by opening the window or sunroof, or scratching your nose, or by eating a sweet, or even by sipping from a bottle (under conditions that do not demand high concentration), and as Richard Burns points out, two hands are not needed to maintain control as power steering has reduced the force needed on the wheel to almost nothing.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 15:35 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 10:44
Posts: 485
Location: Glos, UK
Image

_________________
Carl Prescott


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 16:37 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Rewolf wrote:
...prosecutions such as the infamous Kit-Kat prosecution where if I remember correctly, the passenger had unwrapped it and the driver was prosecuted for eating it, or the woman with her bottle of water.

Now I don't know the exact details of either case, and cannot say whether they were dangerous for other reasons


I think in both cases the cars were stopped at traffic lights. I have also heard stories about drivers being prosecuted for using their mobiles... after pulling over but with the engine still running.

This is why I don't think asking for traffic police instead of cameras is enough. The problem goes deeper than that. It's not just the cameras, it's the idiots who look at the pictures too. If we had traffic police instead, a lot of them would still be the same idiots.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.021s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]