Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Jun 19, 2026 01:10

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 09:33 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 14:14
Posts: 190
Location: Far Enough Behind, Far Enough In Front
Graphic and potentially disturbing image hidden by moderator

This was caused by a Passenger Air Bag By a car going at 60mph :o If you want you can go to http://www.fhm.com and go to pictures for additional comments.The direct link doesn't seem to work

_________________
RoADA Member -GOLD 2008
If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:09 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
That's not a very nice picture. I need advice to know if it oversteps the standards that I should be imposing. Frankly I don't have a clue, but I'm aware that UK TV and newspapers wouldn't use it. Do I need to remove it? Comments appreciated.

(This isn't a complaint Derick, and I certainly don't have a problem with you for posting it. I'm looking at a, err, bigger picture.)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:19 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
That's not a very nice picture. I need advice to know if it oversteps the standards that I should be imposing. Frankly I don't have a clue, but I'm aware that UK TV and newspapers wouldn't use it. Do I need to remove it? Comments appreciated.

It would probably be better simply with a link to the underlying image so it isn't so "in your face", as it were.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:32 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
PeterE wrote:
It would probably be better simply with a link to the underlying image so it isn't so "in your face", as it were.


Yes. Thanks. Good advice. I've done that. Any further comments still appreciated.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 10:32 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 15:13
Posts: 269
Derick wrote:


This was caused by a Passenger Air Bag By a car going at 60mph :o If you want you can go to http://www.fhm.com and go to pictures for additional comments.The direct link doesn't seem to work


What part of the FHM site? Having seen the picture, I'd like to read the article. I've had a quick look but can't find it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 11:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
SafeSpeed wrote:
but I'm aware that UK TV and newspapers wouldn't use it. Do I need to remove it? Comments appreciated.

I personally see no difference in the "gruesome" stakes between that picture, & the one of Daniella Westbrook's cocaine ravaged nose that was published in the tabloids not so long ago.

The actual injury itself is not that bad, and certainly nothing that cannot be fixed by a few butterfly stitches.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 11:25 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 14:14
Posts: 190
Location: Far Enough Behind, Far Enough In Front
SafeSpeed wrote:
That's not a very nice picture. I need advice to know
(This isn't a complaint Derick, and I certainly don't have a problem with you for posting it. I'm looking at a, err, bigger picture.)

Thanks Paul. Wasn't sure What to do with It. :wink: Apoligies If It Offended :roll:

_________________
RoADA Member -GOLD 2008
If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.


Last edited by Derick on Sat Jul 16, 2005 11:33, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 11:32 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 14:14
Posts: 190
Location: Far Enough Behind, Far Enough In Front
PaulF wrote:

What part of the FHM site? Having seen the picture, I'd like to read the article. I've had a quick look but can't find it.


When On Home page, Look at Bottom For MMS Gallery, when that appears there Is 4 Boards - You want The Horror Section On Right (In Green) In there somewhere :wink:

_________________
RoADA Member -GOLD 2008
If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 13:58 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 01:47
Posts: 379
Location: Cumbria / Oxford
That's probably a better thing to receive than a steering wheel to the face. Although how on earth did an airbag manage to make such a sharp cut?

_________________
-mike[F]
Caught in the rush of the crowd, lost in a wall of sound..


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 16:19 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
mike[F] wrote:
That's probably a better thing to receive than a steering wheel to the face.

:yesyes: Couldn't agree more Mike. I expected it would be something shocking that might make me question the wisdom of driving a car with an airbag, but really all it shows is that crashing a car can hurt - airbag notwithstanding! Still best to avoid crashing in the first place, but we all knew that without the picture.
mike[F] wrote:
Although how on earth did an airbag manage to make such a sharp cut?

I'm wondering about that too. Maybe BiBs with hands on experience of dealing with RTCs could explain it, or Mad Moggie with his medical knowledge. I can think of a possibility - if the airbag went off while the guy had a hand in front of it the bag could have made him smack himself in the face pretty hard, and if he was wearing a ring as well that maybe that could have been enough to cause the injury in the photo. No knowledge or experience, just a wild guess on my part.

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 16:29 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
ah.. 'tis but a flesh wound.

burns & bruising are also quite normal if you get airbagged.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 17:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
Doesn't look so bad to me considering this was a 60mph (allegedly) impact.

Also no mention of what vehicle or was there any object between airbag and nose at the time.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 19:36 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
Gatsobait wrote:
mike[F] wrote:
Although how on earth did an airbag manage to make such a sharp cut?

I'm wondering about that too. Maybe BiBs with hands on experience of dealing with RTCs could explain it, or Mad Moggie with his medical knowledge. I can think of a possibility - if the airbag went off while the guy had a hand in front of it the bag could have made him smack himself in the face pretty hard, and if he was wearing a ring as well that maybe that could have been enough to cause the injury in the photo. No knowledge or experience, just a wild guess on my part.


Considering the violent nature of the inflation and the fact that older airbags are rough in texture, it is possible that the force just pushed the nose to the extend that it split. Bet it stung though!

Gareth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 20:46 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: I attended quite a few ROADA lectures on the subject of road safety. I was once lectured on the dangers of these airbags by a senior fire officer who showed many pictures of accidents and the victims involved. He told me that it is dangerous to sit any closer than 18 inches in front of an airbag. If it goes off, there is enough force to violently push your head back and break your neck.

My ROADA driving instructor told me that it's possible to have airbags deactivated BUT, if you ask you car dealer to deactivate these devices, they'll hand you a document which you must give to your insurance company and that could affect your insurance.

_________________
Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 20:54 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I'm just waiting for the crash stats that arise from spurious air bag deployment. They are supposed to have a service life of ten years. What are they going to do in a 12 year old car with dodgy wiring? Are any owners of 10 year old cars going to replace their air bags?

How do you fancy having one of those blow up in your face (literally!) on L3 of a motorway at 70mph?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 21:05 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
SafeSpeed wrote:
I'm just waiting for the crash stats that arise from spurious air bag deployment. They are supposed to have a service life of ten years. What are they going to do in a 12 year old car with dodgy wiring? Are any owners of 10 year old cars going to replace their air bags?

How do you fancy having one of those blow up in your face (literally!) on L3 of a motorway at 70mph?


Until I got this latest Accord, my motors have all been pre-airbag. I have not yet researched the service aspect of airbags, but I'm guessing it's a case of visual inspection of the bag and replacement of the explosive sachet(s). I'm also guessing it is not a light undertaking and will require some pretty highly trained technicians to do it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 21:14 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Roger wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I'm just waiting for the crash stats that arise from spurious air bag deployment. They are supposed to have a service life of ten years. What are they going to do in a 12 year old car with dodgy wiring? Are any owners of 10 year old cars going to replace their air bags?

How do you fancy having one of those blow up in your face (literally!) on L3 of a motorway at 70mph?


Until I got this latest Accord, my motors have all been pre-airbag. I have not yet researched the service aspect of airbags, but I'm guessing it's a case of visual inspection of the bag and replacement of the explosive sachet(s). I'm also guessing it is not a light undertaking and will require some pretty highly trained technicians to do it.


I still haven't owned an air bag car. It's not the device itself that scares me - it's the wiring that controls it. Somewhere there's a wire that carries the trigger signal. How many vehicles reach the end of their life without experiencing a significant wiring fault? Have they taken steps to ensure that shorting that wire to +12 or ground won't trigger the explosives?

If they had asked me to design it I would have insisted on a trigger signal that could not easily be spuriously generated. For example, we could have a 200 volt pulse required to trigger the air bag. The trigger sensor could incorporate the electronics required to generate the 200V trigger signal. But I wouldn't mind betting it's just +12V and shorting the wire to power will trigger it.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 21:20 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
SafeSpeed wrote:
Roger wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I'm just waiting for the crash stats that arise from spurious air bag deployment. They are supposed to have a service life of ten years. What are they going to do in a 12 year old car with dodgy wiring? Are any owners of 10 year old cars going to replace their air bags?

How do you fancy having one of those blow up in your face (literally!) on L3 of a motorway at 70mph?


Until I got this latest Accord, my motors have all been pre-airbag. I have not yet researched the service aspect of airbags, but I'm guessing it's a case of visual inspection of the bag and replacement of the explosive sachet(s). I'm also guessing it is not a light undertaking and will require some pretty highly trained technicians to do it.


I still haven't owned an air bag car. It's not the device itself that scares me - it's the wiring that controls it. Somewhere there's a wire that carries the trigger signal. How many vehicles reach the end of their life without experiencing a significant wiring fault? Have they taken steps to ensure that shorting that wire to +12 or ground won't trigger the explosives?

If they had asked me to design it I would have insisted on a trigger signal that could not easily be spuriously generated. For example, we could have a 200 volt pulse required to trigger the air bag. The trigger sensor could incorporate the electronics required to generate the 200V trigger signal. But I wouldn't mind betting it's just +12V and shorting the wire to power will trigger it.


If they'd asked me to specify the design, it would require an intelligent pulse train - two-way interrogation. Mind you, there has to be a weak link somewhere - a spurious signal from the accelerometer indicating a serious impact will cause them to go off.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 21:46 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Roger wrote:
If they'd asked me to specify the design, it would require an intelligent pulse train - two-way interrogation.


Are you sure you have thought about this? No no, and thrice NO!

The problem with this sort of scheme is that you have to delegate trigger responsibility to some logic electronics - the logic electronics might be affected by spikes, RFI or by circuit failure. Where one really needs to use logic electronics in such a situation, I would recommend duplication or triplication. For air bag deployment I'd steer very well clear of the logic electronics.

Roger wrote:
Mind you, there has to be a weak link somewhere - a spurious signal from the accelerometer indicating a serious impact will cause them to go off.


I'm not so worried about the behaviour of mechanical sealed 'spring and bob weight' type triggers. Conditions inside the sealed chamber won't change much over a decade, the bob weight won't change weight, and the spring won't fail because it's not subject to regular movement. I'd design the associated electronics to fail safe. The idea of the 200V trigger pulse is good because any failure is likely to cause the 200V supply to fail. No 200V would mean no trigger signal.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 22:01 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
No I'd not thought it through. Points taken regarding the logic - although if in mumetal enclosures and with fibre copling...

Mind you - if the chemicals need a decent dose of joules to make them go I do like the idea of a charged capacitor on the "feed" side of the transducer.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.040s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]