Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Jun 19, 2026 04:53

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 20:22 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
http://www.kentandmedwaysafetycameras.o ... _05_04.pdf

3g.
Quote:
He has also told a member of staff
that he knows where all the staff live and will be filming their driving.
RM has spoken to Adrian’s programme controller Mike Osborne who agreed that this sort of
behaviour was unacceptable and that he would ask Adrian not to mention the Partnership on air
any more.


So apparently it's unacceptable to film a person's driving? Huh? And they actively try to censor critics?

7.
Quote:
CR also explained that Monitron have type approval for a dual red light camera that also
photographs those speeding through a green light as well as those who jump red lights. What did
the Board think about installing these in Kent? The extra function may represent value for money
(two for one) but did we need to actually justify the use of it (would we be unfairly prosecuting
speeders where the crashes weren’t necessarily speed related?). Surprisingly the DfT are happy
to let us go ahead without proving the need for speed enforcement.


So they can put a speed camera anywhere, as long as it's a red light camera too, and the DFT approve.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 23:44 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Kent & Medway partnership minutes wrote:
but did we need to actually justify the use of it

:shock: Bloody hell. No, no need to justify it at all, just stick it up. It's not like you need to be accountable to the public or anything. :roll:

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 13:38 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 19:14
Posts: 410
If someone were to choose somewhere to speed, wouldn't a traffic light controlled junction with the lights on green be one of the safer places to do so? Surely it's safer to speed there than a few tens of metres along the road where there may be uncontrolled exits from side roads etc.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 14:59 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
stevei wrote:
If someone were to choose somewhere to speed, wouldn't a traffic light controlled junction with the lights on green be one of the safer places to do so? Surely it's safer to speed there than a few tens of metres along the road where there may be uncontrolled exits from side roads etc.


Only if you're sure that nobody is going to jump the lights.

Cheers
Peter

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 16:25 
It also begs the question, why the hell doe a Scamera quango need a GSXR750?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 16:56 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
johno1066 wrote:
It also begs the question, why the hell doe a Scamera quango need a GSXR750?

Because somebody, somewhere has greased a palm or two of course :lol:

It is all but a written guarantee that it will be dropped within a week of being on the road anyway, as no doubt "camera guy" will be some wet behind the ears novice who has only just stepped off of a 125 and now thinks he's the dogs dangly bits because he's on a gixxer.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 03:10 
There would be some irony in that happening.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 21:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
Pete317 wrote:
stevei wrote:
If someone were to choose somewhere to speed, wouldn't a traffic light controlled junction with the lights on green be one of the safer places to do so? Surely it's safer to speed there than a few tens of metres along the road where there may be uncontrolled exits from side roads etc.


Only if you're sure that nobody is going to jump the lights.



Such as a fire engine. :cry:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 22:50 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
Homer wrote:
Pete317 wrote:
stevei wrote:
If someone were to choose somewhere to speed, wouldn't a traffic light controlled junction with the lights on green be one of the safer places to do so? Surely it's safer to speed there than a few tens of metres along the road where there may be uncontrolled exits from side roads etc.


Only if you're sure that nobody is going to jump the lights.



Such as a fire engine. :cry:

I believe sufficient speed would reduce exposure to risk :lol: However you'd have to be going like the clappers!

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.030s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]