Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Oct 29, 2025 02:03

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 13:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:15
Posts: 318
Location: Co Durham
I went down the A1 on Monday to Doncaster en-route to Dronfield. There was a long section (about 5 miles) of mandatory 50 mph limit around Leeming for night-time roadworks. Unfortunately it was 4 p.m. and the roadworks were nowhere to be seen. When I came back up at 11 p.m. it was a contraflow so, fine. Not surprisingly in the afternoon I (and one other driver) were the only drivers observing the limit. Everyone one else treated it as 70 mph.
Further down from where the M1 turns off down to Fairburn, a new motorway is being constructed and only one carriageway is in use. Again it is a 50 mph limit for about 6 miles with camera warning signs. Virtually everyone was carefully obeying the limit apart from the odd HGV and car driver. As the traffic is segregated from the works by a crash barrier, 60 mph would have been safe enough.
Is it any wonder that drivers ignore speed limits in roadworks?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:43 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 08:57
Posts: 90
Location: South East England
Can anyone beat this?

A24, West Sussex. Main route in and out of Worthing and environs. Resurfacing on a dual carriageway Northbound reducing it to single lane.
Protected by crash barriers on the offside, there is grass verge and a wooded area on the nearside.

Signs up saying "Convoy system to protect workforce"

Traffic lights at the start of the roadworks holding you up until 'workforce' turn up in a transit van to 'guide' you safely along the single carriageway at the (then) posted limit of... 10 MPH!
Rest of workforce sitting on grass verge, safe distance from traffic watching it all creep past one huge machine redressing the road surface.
The local congestion has been horrendous, what I can't comprehend is...

1 Why such a low speed limit is necessary.
2 Why said speed limit should be lower than the one in force at the gates of local schools?
3 Is no consideration given to the flow of local traffic?

Maybe I'm just a daft old petrolhead?

_________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 13:10 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
A Cyclist wrote:
I went down the A1 on Monday to Doncaster en-route to Dronfield. There was a long section (about 5 miles) of mandatory 50 mph limit around Leeming for night-time roadworks. Unfortunately it was 4 p.m. and the roadworks were nowhere to be seen. When I came back up at 11 p.m. it was a contraflow so, fine. Not surprisingly in the afternoon I (and one other driver) were the only drivers observing the limit. Everyone one else treated it as 70 mph.
Further down from where the M1 turns off down to Fairburn, a new motorway is being constructed and only one carriageway is in use. Again it is a 50 mph limit for about 6 miles with camera warning signs. Virtually everyone was carefully obeying the limit apart from the odd HGV and car driver. As the traffic is segregated from the works by a crash barrier, 60 mph would have been safe enough.
Is it any wonder that drivers ignore speed limits in roadworks?



Sometimes - seems that they pitch the tempos too low. However, cones can be a surprisingly nasty hazard if you blat past them - cauisng them to wobble and fall under another car's tyres at highish spped. Hence - we tend to drive at 50- mph at such points - unless instructed otherwise as the "family rule of thumb" :wink:


But agree - with night time road works where they place the cones and work overnight - seems daft to impose the lower limit when cones removed. Came across this on A19/A1 as well. Confusion does not help promote a safety led ideal. :roll:


But boils back again to education and awareness... :roll:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 13:25 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
I've seen the convoy system used in Alaska where we had to follow the works vehicle round a very twisty bit of road, but from what I remember at a normal pace (hacking it round there would have not been a good idea anyway, not the sort of plcae where you want to come off the road). Never heard of a convoy system being used here. What's wrong with the conventinoal single alternate line of traffic? Is there a world shortage of temporary traffic lights or something?

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 14:06 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
On the M6, travelling overnight to Portsmouth we encountered 3 lots of roadworks - not coned, but the heavy continuous barrier type, and at 3.30 - 4.30 in the morning there was NOBODY behind the barrier, and the limit was at 50.

Since the argument trotted out is usually "the limit is to protect the workforce" then surely no workforce, no limit!

On Sept. 4th, I noticed in one section of the M25 there were 3 lanes open, and a 40 limit in place - while the overhead said 60! Since there was heavy thunderstorm at the time, with rain so heavy the wipers could'nt cope, it did not make a difference except to the idiot who blindly blasted past at 60 anyhow.

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 16:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 17:25
Posts: 94
Beamer wrote:

1 Why such a low speed limit is necessary.
2 Why said speed limit should be lower than the one in force at the gates of local schools?
3 Is no consideration given to the flow of local traffic?

Maybe I'm just a daft old petrolhead?


It depends on the type of resurfacing being undertaken.

With one particular form (called surface dressing - a sort of "tar and chippings" type thing) you need a time of slow vehicle speeds to help to bed the chippings into the surface. This is for two reasons:
(i) it beds the chips well into the surface
(ii) it stops them flying up and damging your paintwork/windscreen and you posting on websites like this about how dangerous it is to have all these loose stones over the surface ;)

Surface dressing generally calls for a very low speeds for an hour or two until the bedding has taken place. This is usually managed using convoy vehicles.

I am aware of no other standards that require 10mph limits to be imposed.

As for the workforce - see the above. It is likely they had just finished the resurfacing and were taking a well earned break. Unless you've been with these crews, you don't know how hard work it is.

(BTW - surface dressing provides no additional remedial life to a road surface, but can help overcome problems of differential settlement in trenches and stuff like that. It is also very very cheap)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 17:02 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
millsee wrote:
Beamer wrote:

1 Why such a low speed limit is necessary.
2 Why said speed limit should be lower than the one in force at the gates of local schools?
3 Is no consideration given to the flow of local traffic?

Maybe I'm just a daft old petrolhead?


It depends on the type of resurfacing being undertaken.

With one particular form (called surface dressing - a sort of "tar and chippings" type thing) you need a time of slow vehicle speeds to help to bed the chippings into the surface. This is for two reasons:
(i) it beds the chips well into the surface
(ii) it stops them flying up and damging your paintwork/windscreen and you posting on websites like this about how dangerous it is to have all these loose stones over the surface ;)



Ja .. if you have had driveway resurfaced .. ist same thing. You have to allow it to bed down ... we had this weed free thing done .. looks quite nice - we had it done in fancy so-called "never suffer weeds" again stuff.

Quote:

As for the workforce - see the above. It is likely they had just finished the resurfacing and were taking a well earned break. Unless you've been with these crews, you don't know how hard work it is.


Liebchen ... :hehe: On the roads I travel on - I am thinking they are on a permanent tea break...

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 22:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 08:57
Posts: 90
Location: South East England
millsee wrote:
Beamer wrote:

1 Why such a low speed limit is necessary.
2 Why said speed limit should be lower than the one in force at the gates of local schools?
3 Is no consideration given to the flow of local traffic?

Maybe I'm just a daft old petrolhead?


It depends on the type of resurfacing being undertaken.

With one particular form (called surface dressing - a sort of "tar and chippings" type thing) you need a time of slow vehicle speeds to help to bed the chippings into the surface. This is for two reasons:
(i) it beds the chips well into the surface
(ii) it stops them flying up and damging your paintwork/windscreen and you posting on websites like this about how dangerous it is to have all these loose stones over the surface ;)

Surface dressing generally calls for a very low speeds for an hour or two until the bedding has taken place. This is usually managed using convoy vehicles.

I am aware of no other standards that require 10mph limits to be imposed.

As for the workforce - see the above. It is likely they had just finished the resurfacing and were taking a well earned break. Unless you've been with these crews, you don't know how hard work it is.

(BTW - surface dressing provides no additional remedial life to a road surface, but can help overcome problems of differential settlement in trenches and stuff like that. It is also very very cheap)


Sorry - I may not have made it clear, the lane that was being resurfaced/dressed was closed off. The lane that was not planed/surfaced/dressed was the one that we were using at 10 MPH. It wasn't to protect the newly laid surface.

Ta for the answers anyway.

_________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 04:23 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4813
Location: Essex
Quote:
Surface dressing generally calls for a very low speeds for an hour or two until the bedding has taken place. This is usually managed using convoy vehicles.

Is this another "cut back" - and work that used to be done in a more controlled manner witrh a steamroller?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:24 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 17:25
Posts: 94
Roger wrote:
Quote:
Surface dressing generally calls for a very low speeds for an hour or two until the bedding has taken place. This is usually managed using convoy vehicles.

Is this another "cut back" - and work that used to be done in a more controlled manner witrh a steamroller?


No, and rollers are rarely steam-powered any more :lol:

Seriously, there's only so much a roller can do. Over-rolling can result in the stone being crushed or pressed too far into the tar resulting in lower grip on the surface. Much better to allow car tyres to do some of the compaction at low speed. It gets the road open quicker since:

Quote:
3 Is no consideration given to the flow of local traffic?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:55 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4813
Location: Essex
millsee wrote:
Roger wrote:
Quote:
Surface dressing generally calls for a very low speeds for an hour or two until the bedding has taken place. This is usually managed using convoy vehicles.

Is this another "cut back" - and work that used to be done in a more controlled manner witrh a steamroller?


No, and rollers are rarely steam-powered any more :lol:

Seriously, there's only so much a roller can do. Over-rolling can result in the stone being crushed or pressed too far into the tar resulting in lower grip on the surface. Much better to allow car tyres to do some of the compaction at low speed. It gets the road open quicker since:

Quote:
3 Is no consideration given to the flow of local traffic?


That makes sense - Thanks.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 19:49 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
Shouldn't that have been TAR for the answers?

And shouldn't we get a contribution towards the costs of providing this bedding in service - like a free wash to get the tar spots off the paintwork? :roll:

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 20:09 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4813
Location: Essex
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Shouldn't that have been TAR for the answers?

And shouldn't we get a contribution towards the costs of providing this bedding in service - like a free wash to get the tar spots off the paintwork? :roll:


:-) Get you, sailor :lol:

Car wash - no the TARif is too high ;-)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:31 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
please direct all your road surfacing queries in my direction

(i know a man who knows something about it)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:44 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
I am told that half of the problem with this is due to the hassle of going through the bureaucracy of getting the temporary speed limit issued in the first place. It can take weeks and is lots of paperwork, and you are not allowed to deviate from the original plan, therefore.

If a roadworks is planned to be 4 weeks of night-time only, then a couple of days where 24/7 work is needed, you need to apply for 4 weeks of 24/7 temporary speed limit

If the roadworks is working on a 4 mile stretch for 8 weeks, with the work divided into sections of half a mile, each taking a week to complete, then moving up to the next one, you need to apply for a 4-mile long temporary speed limit for 8 weeks.


On this topic, can anyone please explain why if you drive at 3AM, you will randomly find about 1/4 mile of the outside lane coned off, no work going on, no people, no speed limit, just a bit of coned off lane. I did a 200 mile trip at this sort of time, and encountered 5 or 6 of these on the motorway network. Best explanation I can come up with is the Cone Fairy.. if you leave an uncongested bit of motorway under your pillow, she will come and leave you 50 cones.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 13:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 17:25
Posts: 94
Lum wrote:
I am told that half of the problem with this


Not so far off.

The other half of the problem is continually putting out and pulling in cones. If you ever think about setting up a business, you could do worse than establish a TM business!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 13:33 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
millsee wrote:
Lum wrote:
I am told that half of the problem with this


Not so far off.

The other half of the problem is continually putting out and pulling in cones. If you ever think about setting up a business, you could do worse than establish a TM business!


What's a TM in this context?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 13:37 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 08:57
Posts: 90
Location: South East England
Lum wrote:
millsee wrote:
Lum wrote:
I am told that half of the problem with this


Not so far off.

The other half of the problem is continually putting out and pulling in cones. If you ever think about setting up a business, you could do worse than establish a TM business!


What's a TM in this context?


Traffic Management?

_________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 14:04 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 17:25
Posts: 94
Lum wrote:

What's a TM in this context?


Sorry. Yep, traffic management. Licence to print money IMO.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 17:17 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
Theres no doubt that its a lucrative line of work.

can't remember what the rates are but do some sums around this

50p per cone per week...signs vary according to size etc.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.019s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]