SafeSpeed wrote:
3) It sounds like a valid objection to suggest that we shouldn't trust crap drivers to drive safely (and frequently, in particular, to set safe and appropriate speeds). But trust them we must - there is simply no alternative.
OK, heres the rub. Personally I
think that the two elements of this point do not make comfortable bedfellows. But hey, it's
your website and campaign, and if you are happy with it as a construct then fine, it's your parts in the grinder after all
Can I just make another comment, about the SS site as a whole (stupid to pose it as a qustion because I'm going to anyway
).
Take the 12mph argument as an example. I had to read the whole thing through no fewer than 3 times, deconstructing each segment on a seperate sheet of paper as I went, before I finally got the point! The same is true of much of the other content, it gives the
impression of a 'smoke and mirrors' argument. Is it possible to distil the salient points into a few lines with a link to the full text of the argument perhaps? Dunno, just thinking aloud here.
Yours
Jeff 'rigpig' Davis