botach wrote:
Could this again be down to misuse of stats - only a speculation , but as HGV are on the roads a lot more than cars - has some person decided to look at accident figures and thought that a hgv was involved in a high percentage of each, because the "figures " tell them so ( like the speed mantra) and decided (like the speed lobby) that since the accidents have HGV as common factor, the drivers need retraining every x years - like some trades have to pass a rules test every so many years - surely the fact that these people drive x millions of accident free miles a year is enough .
Again - this will only ( or will it????) target UK drivers ---if so who regulates the standards of the foreigners ??( or the hours etc of the ones who change tractor units and tachos at say Dover)
it is common knowledge that foreigners are pretty much untouchable although i believe there is new legislation coming out as we speak to combat this. our police force cant get details from foreign forces about drivers (they can get ours though

) so they do what they like on our roads knowing that there is no punishment for it
as for tachos, the chart goes with you no matter how many times you change vehicle so your full days work is all on one chart
surely the more miles you do, the safer you should be? i tried that one on an insurance company who preferred someone with more experience than myself when insuring high performance cars. i promptly pointed out that having a licence for 20 years does not necessarity mean they have more experience than me. they could cover 5000 miles a year whereas my count is more like 50000+